MCPS covid cases

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

No omicron death and no reinfection after omicron. So omicron could be good news.

What are you talking about? There have been deaths and we don't know reinfection as its so new.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

"Health authorities said the individuals infected were so far displaying mild symptoms, with none hospitalised." I'd say that's working.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

"Health authorities said the individuals infected were so far displaying mild symptoms, with none hospitalised." I'd say that's working.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

"Health authorities said the individuals infected were so far displaying mild symptoms, with none hospitalised." I'd say that's working.

+1

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

"Health authorities said the individuals infected were so far displaying mild symptoms, with none hospitalised." I'd say that's working.

+1

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

What's "success" in your book? Since the earliest days of "flatten the curve" it's been about not overwhelming the medical systems. Infection with only mild symptoms is a success.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

"Health authorities said the individuals infected were so far displaying mild symptoms, with none hospitalised." I'd say that's working.

+1

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

What's "success" in your book? Since the earliest days of "flatten the curve" it's been about not overwhelming the medical systems. Infection with only mild symptoms is a success.

Great. Let’s have more successes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

How would "mild symptoms" NOT be great news?????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

How would "mild symptoms" NOT be great news?????

How are all of you so wrong? It's astounding. Spoiler: Omicron is not great news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

"Health authorities said the individuals infected were so far displaying mild symptoms, with none hospitalised." I'd say that's working.

+1

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

Yes because they’re barely sick. Did you really think there would be a day when covid wasn’t around in some form? The goal is to make it mild

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

"Health authorities said the individuals infected were so far displaying mild symptoms, with none hospitalised." I'd say that's working.

+1

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

What's "success" in your book? Since the earliest days of "flatten the curve" it's been about not overwhelming the medical systems. Infection with only mild symptoms is a success.

Flattening the curve was only a part of getting this under control. And we certainly aren't even doing that now that Omicron is here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

"Health authorities said the individuals infected were so far displaying mild symptoms, with none hospitalised." I'd say that's working.

+1

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

Yes because they’re barely sick. Did you really think there would be a day when covid wasn’t around in some form? The goal is to make it mild

The fact that you think that we can make it mild is amusing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:question for the virology experts: if omicron turns out to be not virulent at all is it a good idea to get infected? One will get some immunity from the infection but not the sickness, right? Or is it even possible to neutralize the virulent part of its RNA to turn it into some kind of live vaccine?

It would be funny if it works that way. All the anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers will get vaccinated by breathing.

And vaccinated will get it too.

This trope again?! You never quit; I'll give you that.

We don't have enough evidence of how the vaxxes work for omicron. The vaxxes work really for all previous variants.

You again. Did you miss the super spreader party that everyone was vaccinated? Read the news.

"Health authorities said the individuals infected were so far displaying mild symptoms, with none hospitalised." I'd say that's working.

+1

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

Yes because they’re barely sick. Did you really think there would be a day when covid wasn’t around in some form? The goal is to make it mild

The fact that you think that we can make it mild is amusing.

There is no selection pressure for covid to be virulent or more virulent. So eventually it will make itself mild by mutation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

How would "mild symptoms" NOT be great news?????

How are all of you so wrong? It's astounding. Spoiler: Omicron is not great news.

People are having mild symptoms, and you think that's BAD news? Huh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The threshold for success has gone so low. Outbreaks in Oslo, Denmark and Somerset, England with attack rates between 30 and 80% and we are acting like it's great news.

How would "mild symptoms" NOT be great news?????

How are all of you so wrong? It's astounding. Spoiler: Omicron is not great news.

People are having mild symptoms, and you think that's BAD news? Huh.

Some may still develop long covid with mild symptoms. No one really knows the long term consequences of covid infection (severe or mild). For that mattet we do not know if there are any long term consequences of covid vaccines either.