Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
It’s because you’re in Austin. Snoop Dogg was all over the Olympics and was discussed on a football game this weekend because of his youth football league in Souther California that some player benefitted from. I don’t live in SoCal but see and hear about Snoop all the time. |
So dcum's search function sucks but here's just a few recent one's I could remember: A thread about how tennis will (or should) eclipse football as the great American pastime: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1225749.page Thread about how the NFL is "worthless": https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1111390.page#24306119 A whole thread about why Snoop Dogg was so prevalent and involved with the Olympics: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1218787.page One thing that's different about these threads is that they die faster because peopel who are fans of the NFL or Snoop or whatever do not rush in and post a ton to these threads in defense. The Snoop thread got longer specifically because more people came in to defend him and the criticism sort of died out but the tone of it was just more mellow than the average Taylor thread. It was like "I think he's funny whatever" but no one is that upset that people don't like him. Other threads barely make it a few pages because there is no back and forth. NFL fans do not care if other people like the NFL. It's enormously popular and therefore not going anywhere so if you don't like it oh well. Tom Brady gets a TON of criticism on this website and elsewhere (he's truly reviled by many people even as he's widely regarded as one of the best if not the best QB of all time) but people don't work that hard to defend him because it's like "whatever he has 5 SB rings". This is the normal reaction of fans of people or products that are enormously popular -- they don't really have to defend them because who cares if some minority of people disagree. These debates get no traction as a result. People who don't like these things say their peace and there's almost no response and then everyone moves on because whatever everyone is entitled to an opinion even if I think it sucks. Swift threads regularly go on for 100s of pages specifically because Swift fans are extremely defensive of her and come out in force to try and refute every single argument against her. Both the plainly ridiculous ("she's ugly" or "she's talentless") or the obviously true ("she's overexposed" or "a lot of her popularity is the result of smart marketing"). Swifties won't yield and inch. And that only makes the people who dislike her happy because it creates something to argue against and ridicule. It locks everyone into this constant back and forth where no one can just say "agree to disgree I guess" even though that's the obvious solution. If swifties just ignored or viewed themselves as above debates over whether or not others like Swift or not then these conversations would die pretty fast. But y'all take a scorched earth approach to criticism of her even though uh she's a billionaire and was named Person of the Year last year -- I think she's fine. I think actually enjoy feeling like the persecuted underdog even though actually you are just big fans of the single most famous musical act in the world right now -- it's not hard! I think it's funny and participate in these threads even though I do not hate Swift and think she's talented and earned her success because I enjoy the back and forth and because some of the arguments I see on here defending Swift are so deranged I can't not engage. I suspect there are many like me on here -- we enjoy the fight. I'll post both in favor of and against Taylor depending on the issue. She's currently the most famous person in the world so there's lots of fodder for debate. It's a testament to her relevancy (but not actually evidence that her music is not bland -- I do think it is). |
Ok cool. Hook ‘em. |
| Comparing an entire genre (sports) to one person is a weird comparison. That is more like comparing music to sports or Taylor to one specific athlete. I don't think there is an athlete where they are talked about daily in every sphere. |
Travis Kelce is trying real hard. He’s hitching is wagon to the Taylor machine to try to get the same success. Seems to be working. |
Why don’t you understand why swift fans would be on this thread? The title is asking Gen Xers if they find Taylor Swift music to be bland. And clearly there are a lot of Gen Xers, whose answered to that is no. Why would they not participate in this thread? |
And she’s trying to have fun and be happy Seems to be working |
Her multitude of sad songs suggest otherwise. |
Why said Swift fans can't or shouldn't participate in the thread? The comment was about getting defensive and engaging in back and forth debate over something that is inherently subjective instead of just accepting that people think what they think and letting it go. A lot of Swift fans can do the latter but some cannot and that's what drives all the traffic to these threads -- the need to "win" the argument about Swift which is unwinnable because we will never have true consensus on whether a music artist or celebrity is "good" or "the best" or not. People will always disagree. Nature of the beast. |
Uh- This is one where I can’t even understand Orr agree with the lyrics. No one’s job as a parent is to protect someone from future pain. Your job is to give them the tools to deal with life. And curtailing a kids curiosity is like child abuse as far as I’m concerned. |
The whole song sounds like she's being anesthetized for dental work. Even the music struggles to slow down and then bounce along and then drag out alongside her clunky lyrics. Pacing is random. |
My theory is that she will just repeat the same Note over and over until she get she words out she has written. So rhythmically and melodically her songs will follow whatever the lyrics dictate.So in essence there is little melody or rhythm so she can fit the lyrics in |
It’s a song about a kid dying of cancer. It’s about an actual kid who died of cancer at the age of 6. |
Well then that is an example of not so great lyrics. If you have to know all the background they aren’t writing in the song in order to make it understood, that is not great storytelling. You have to know that in order to appreciate it, and it isn’t in the lyrics. Then n people like the PP who wrote it made them remember their kids childhood will be confused and confuse listeners like me who think it sounds horrible. Poor kid and family though. |
They spent 6 months acting like he wasn’t dying of cancer so he could have 6 months more of childhood. It’s nobody’s business except the family and TS what the lyrics mean and how closely they mimic exactly what the family saw and did. It’s not about you. That must drive you crazy. |