Harris Walz interview w CNN

[Anonymous]

Hey MAGAs, care to explain Donny boy’s flip flops on abortion?

[Anonymous]

Crickets from MAGAs on Trump’s abortion flip
flops.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

+1 funny how he embellished his military service but was much more modest about his DUI. I mean, 96 MPH while wasted is nothing to shake a stick at.

A 96 mph DUI is not as big of a crime as paying a porn star her bill of service and filing it as hush money under a business account. That’s worth life in prison. Now that’s really awful.

The public was really at risk with that one.

Huh? Walz was lucky to not have killed people. That's much worse than paying a hooker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

+1 funny how he embellished his military service but was much more modest about his DUI. I mean, 96 MPH while wasted is nothing to shake a stick at.

A 96 mph DUI is not as big of a crime as paying a porn star her bill of service and filing it as hush money under a business account. That’s worth life in prison. Now that’s really awful.

The public was really at risk with that one.

Well the 13,000 people injured or killed each year by drunk drivers might disagree with you, if they could.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Crickets from MAGAs on Trump’s abortion flip
flops.

Pretty sure the right is OK with the guy that got rid of Roe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris answers softball interview questions the way a child tries to summarize a book he was supposed to read but clearly didn’t.

Tom Sawyer: He was Tom. Tom Sawyer. He was a boy. A boy named Tom who did all the things young boys do. The book’s author, who wrote Tom Sawyer, told a wonderful tale about the boy and his adventures. He laughed and he loved and he loved to laugh. And we can all learn a lot about what this boy Tom Sawyer experienced in this book.

You have that backwards. She answers the questions the way you summarize an issue to a third grader. As a prosecutor she was trained to keep her questions simple and her responses simpler. You explain your position on a third grade level, so that everyone on your jury understands the connections. It's in her training.

So… what you’re saying is she going after the stupid vote

DP... When I pointed out Trump's Flesch-Kinkaid score from his speech transcripts comes up as 5th grade, I was told by you MAGAs that it was all part of Trump's brilliant master plan "to appeal to a wide base." So in short Trump's already been going after the stupid vote since before 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

+1 funny how he embellished his military service but was much more modest about his DUI. I mean, 96 MPH while wasted is nothing to shake a stick at.

A 96 mph DUI is not as big of a crime as paying a porn star her bill of service and filing it as hush money under a business account. That’s worth life in prison. Now that’s really awful.

The public was really at risk with that one.

Huh? Walz was lucky to not have killed people. That's much worse than paying a hooker.

Walz could have defused the DUI conviction during his rise to power by volunteering or raising money for MADD. He could then apologize, say that he learned his lesson, and point to MADD for some credibility. He didn't. He assumed the media wouldn't make a big deal of it, and the media hasn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris answers softball interview questions the way a child tries to summarize a book he was supposed to read but clearly didn’t.

Tom Sawyer: He was Tom. Tom Sawyer. He was a boy. A boy named Tom who did all the things young boys do. The book’s author, who wrote Tom Sawyer, told a wonderful tale about the boy and his adventures. He laughed and he loved and he loved to laugh. And we can all learn a lot about what this boy Tom Sawyer experienced in this book.

You have that backwards. She answers the questions the way you summarize an issue to a third grader. As a prosecutor she was trained to keep her questions simple and her responses simpler. You explain your position on a third grade level, so that everyone on your jury understands the connections. It's in her training.

So… what you’re saying is she going after the stupid vote

DP... When I pointed out Trump's Flesch-Kinkaid score from his speech transcripts comes up as 5th grade, I was told by you MAGAs that it was all part of Trump's brilliant master plan "to appeal to a wide base." So in short Trump's already been going after the stupid vote since before 2016.

"I love the poorly educated" -Donald Trump

[Anonymous]

Is she on the Sunday shows tomorrow?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris answers softball interview questions the way a child tries to summarize a book he was supposed to read but clearly didn’t.

Tom Sawyer: He was Tom. Tom Sawyer. He was a boy. A boy named Tom who did all the things young boys do. The book’s author, who wrote Tom Sawyer, told a wonderful tale about the boy and his adventures. He laughed and he loved and he loved to laugh. And we can all learn a lot about what this boy Tom Sawyer experienced in this book.

You have that backwards. She answers the questions the way you summarize an issue to a third grader. As a prosecutor she was trained to keep her questions simple and her responses simpler. You explain your position on a third grade level, so that everyone on your jury understands the connections. It's in her training.

So… what you’re saying is she going after the stupid vote

DP... When I pointed out Trump's Flesch-Kinkaid score from his speech transcripts comes up as 5th grade, I was told by you MAGAs that it was all part of Trump's brilliant master plan "to appeal to a wide base." So in short Trump's already been going after the stupid vote since before 2016.

Would be curious what Trump’s score is now. His speech has unraveled significantly since 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris answers softball interview questions the way a child tries to summarize a book he was supposed to read but clearly didn’t.

Tom Sawyer: He was Tom. Tom Sawyer. He was a boy. A boy named Tom who did all the things young boys do. The book’s author, who wrote Tom Sawyer, told a wonderful tale about the boy and his adventures. He laughed and he loved and he loved to laugh. And we can all learn a lot about what this boy Tom Sawyer experienced in this book.

You have that backwards. She answers the questions the way you summarize an issue to a third grader. As a prosecutor she was trained to keep her questions simple and her responses simpler. You explain your position on a third grade level, so that everyone on your jury understands the connections. It's in her training.

So… what you’re saying is she going after the stupid vote

DP... When I pointed out Trump's Flesch-Kinkaid score from his speech transcripts comes up as 5th grade, I was told by you MAGAs that it was all part of Trump's brilliant master plan "to appeal to a wide base." So in short Trump's already been going after the stupid vote since before 2016.

Would be curious what Trump’s score is now. His speech has unraveled significantly since 2016.

Most TV shows and news broadcasts are written for a certain education level to ensure that they reach most of the target audience.

Politicians would do well to speak plainly so that they're clearly understood. What's wrong with this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris answers softball interview questions the way a child tries to summarize a book he was supposed to read but clearly didn’t.

Tom Sawyer: He was Tom. Tom Sawyer. He was a boy. A boy named Tom who did all the things young boys do. The book’s author, who wrote Tom Sawyer, told a wonderful tale about the boy and his adventures. He laughed and he loved and he loved to laugh. And we can all learn a lot about what this boy Tom Sawyer experienced in this book.

You have that backwards. She answers the questions the way you summarize an issue to a third grader. As a prosecutor she was trained to keep her questions simple and her responses simpler. You explain your position on a third grade level, so that everyone on your jury understands the connections. It's in her training.

So… what you’re saying is she going after the stupid vote

DP... When I pointed out Trump's Flesch-Kinkaid score from his speech transcripts comes up as 5th grade, I was told by you MAGAs that it was all part of Trump's brilliant master plan "to appeal to a wide base." So in short Trump's already been going after the stupid vote since before 2016.

Would be curious what Trump’s score is now. His speech has unraveled significantly since 2016.

Most TV shows and news broadcasts are written for a certain education level to ensure that they reach most of the target audience.

Politicians would do well to speak plainly so that they're clearly understood. What's wrong with this?

You think Trump speaks clearly??

[Anonymous]

Harris and Walz did such a good job and the reason we all now that they did is because the corporate owned media didn’t get their gotcha moment despite the questions being asked by a festering right winger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris answers softball interview questions the way a child tries to summarize a book he was supposed to read but clearly didn’t.

Tom Sawyer: He was Tom. Tom Sawyer. He was a boy. A boy named Tom who did all the things young boys do. The book’s author, who wrote Tom Sawyer, told a wonderful tale about the boy and his adventures. He laughed and he loved and he loved to laugh. And we can all learn a lot about what this boy Tom Sawyer experienced in this book.

You have that backwards. She answers the questions the way you summarize an issue to a third grader. As a prosecutor she was trained to keep her questions simple and her responses simpler. You explain your position on a third grade level, so that everyone on your jury understands the connections. It's in her training.

So… what you’re saying is she going after the stupid vote

DP... When I pointed out Trump's Flesch-Kinkaid score from his speech transcripts comes up as 5th grade, I was told by you MAGAs that it was all part of Trump's brilliant master plan "to appeal to a wide base." So in short Trump's already been going after the stupid vote since before 2016.

"I love the poorly educated" -Donald Trump

Y’all cain’t take away mah freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris and Walz did such a good job and the reason we all now that they did is because the corporate owned media didn’t get their gotcha moment despite the questions being asked by a festering right winger.

They didn't hurt themselves, so I guess that's a win? Both did make unfortunate comments that will still be used in Trump battle ground state ads. They should have come up with better lines than my values haven't changed and I used poor grammar. PPs have explained how they could have handled things better, which means they need better media consultants.