Harris Walz interview w CNN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t say the interview was a disaster but it didn’t inspire confidence about the debate and it is concerning CNN won’t release the unedited version.

I wonder just how many edits they had to make. I also wonder if she had an earpiece on or if she was reading because she kept looking down.

It’s concerning that CNN allows a lady to moderate a presidential debate if her husband tried to discredit damming evidence of one of the participants that was 100% true.

+1

You MAGAs are so uninformed. Dana Bash and Jeremy Bash divorced in 2007. Why do you keep bringing up this dumb point? At least check your facts first.

Why does she use Jeremy Bash’s last name and not King? She had kids with John king? I guess the Bash name goes further in Washington.

It’s not PP’s fault they assumed she was still with Bash. She’s called Dana Bash

She had a child with King and he converted to Judaism for her and the child is being raised in the Jewish faith. Dana dumped King after a few years.

Can't stay in a relationship?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She didn’t do a great job with the interview anyhow. She should’ve asked Kamala the first obvious question “why was Walz there?”

Because every first interview is the two of them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Walz was not needed and actually a distraction.

He had the biggest gaffe of the whole interview with the grammar comment immediately headlined by CNN.

She needs more confidence if she wants to be POTUS. She should’ve handled that interview alone

Joint interviews for a new ticket are common.

Are you aware of this?

After the Presidential candidate has done some solo interviews first....

Can you explain really what Walz added to the interview - and why he was deemed absolutely necessary to be there?

Harris' team could have explained Walz' presence much better before the interview. For example, Harris could have said that because there is so little time before the election, it was crucial for America to get to know Walz, etc... In other words, Harris should have sent the clear message that she didn't need Walz there, but thought that America could benefit more in hearing from both of them - a 2-for-1 interview. Instead, Harris let conservative media characterize Walz as her "emotional comfort governor".

Who says it was "absolutely necessary"? He was there bc he/they wanted to be? They can do whatever interview type they feel like.

Whose perferences should they have followed w respect to interview style, place, network, interviewer, questions covered etc? Yours? A random internet person? Mine? Where are you getting this standard they were supposed to adhere to? Stop watching Fox and use your brain

And they pay whatever price that decision carries. Right now, Walz's preference is a question mark at the very least, but many people perceive his presence as indicating Harris couldn't handle the interview alone.

He also looked more presidential than Harris in the interview. The staging was poor.

Cuz he’s a man and you’re sexist.

No. Given the camera angle, she looked small, hunched over leaning on the table, not confident, and her clothes blended into the gray of the background. He sat straight up, look large and dominant given the angle, and wore colors that stood out. Your eye went to him, not her. Nothing to do with gender. Shrink Walz, have him slouch over the table, and wear all gray and it would be the same verdict.

+1. The optics were poor and the substance wasn’t much better. Huge fail after a 40 day delay. Polls are beginning to soften. Americans just saw this movie with Biden where his staff protected him and said he was sharp as a tack. Swing voters need some proof that Kamila is up to the job. Of course the hard core Ds think it was fine, but it really wasn’t.

And what we get with Trump is a staff that tries to protect him but can't. He is a disaster and only the cultists don't see it. And, he is being totally protected by the corporate media.

[Anonymous]

She is the worst.

[Anonymous]

I don’t care how bad Harris and Walz might be, they have enough brains to let others help them and muddle through

I would be happier with Trump’s tax policies, but willing to pay more in taxes to get him back to Florida with all the other loonies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care how bad Harris and Walz might be, they have enough brains to let others help them and muddle through

I would be happier with Trump’s tax policies, but willing to pay more in taxes to get him back to Florida with all the other loonies.

Thanks for your honesty. Anyone but Trump, even if doing so is against your own interests (and millions of other Americans).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is the worst.

Lay off JD. He’s trying his best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care how bad Harris and Walz might be, they have enough brains to let others help them and muddle through

I would be happier with Trump’s tax policies, but willing to pay more in taxes to get him back to Florida with all the other loonies.

Thanks for your honesty. Anyone but Trump, even if doing so is against your own interests (and millions of other Americans).

Millions of elites aren't more important than hundreds of millions of ordinary people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care how bad Harris and Walz might be, they have enough brains to let others help them and muddle through

I would be happier with Trump’s tax policies, but willing to pay more in taxes to get him back to Florida with all the other loonies.

Thanks for your honesty. Anyone but Trump, even if doing so is against your own interests (and millions of other Americans).

How is not voting for Trump the rapist and convicted felon against my own interests?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She fit this interview in while in Georgia campaigning. She is speaking in Savannah as I am typing this and this was the 4th or 5th stop on this run.

Savannah

They bused in the crowd from Atlanta.

Sure they did dummy, just a four-and-a-half-hour drive away!

They did.

The local news reported widely on this.

Was it the lamestream media? Fake news! MAGA!

No it was the local news station. WJCL.

they interviewed people on the busses.

That defeats the purpose. I thought they were trying to get the Savannah voters

She's got the Savannah voters in my family.

Mine as well. And they are a retired military family.

Please be careful here. Savannah is a term used in the American south to categorize an African American’s skin tone- a lighter tone like Kamala. I am sure you didn’t mean it that way but what you said is triggering to African Americans from the south.

WTF are you talking about? I grew up in South Georgia and I have never heard this in my life.

+1 my husband also grew up in South Georgia. PP is full of it. Or talking about Georgia the Country.