Hunter Biden indicted on nine tax charges, adding to gun charges in special counsel probe

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.


And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.


And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.


Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."


Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.


He was charged with having a gun while using drugs. The drug use is in his memoir. What does the laptop have to do with anything?


The laptop contained pictures of Hunter doing drugs, emails and messages about buying and using drugs, at least one video of him weighing cocaine in a hotel room on a scale, etc.

The laptop’s information helped prosecutors prove their case. If Hunter’s legal team could have shown anything was added to or tampered with his laptop, I don’t think it could have been used as evidence.

Because Hunter’s legal team didn’t even attempt to show the laptop was tampered with, they absolutely knew it was futile.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s the thing that MAGA just doesn’t get:

Hunter won’t be pardoned.
No one will threaten the judge or jury.
There is no connection to Joe Biden. None.

Was it a political prosecution? Maybe, but no one is threatening to burn down the judiciary because Hunter was tried and convicted by a jury.


Correct. There is no connection to Joe Biden for the drug related offenses.

Now, for the tax evasion, Burisma and money laundering, there is.

No, there isn't. Comer and Jordan have been chasing that mirage for years and have NOTHNG to show for it. It's great theater though, which is really its only purpose.

There is no direct link but it’s hard not to read something like this and have your eyebrows raised.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/08/joe-biden-aides-family-business-dealings-00161476


"Ten percent for the big guy"


If there ever was a 10% for the big guy, it pales in comparison to the 2 billion presidential advisor Jared Kushner got from the Saudis.


All you are doing is normalizing blatant, unabashed corruption that corrodes any trust in the institution of the presidency.


How dare the son in law of a former president open an investment fund.

He should have been making paintings with his coke straw.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s the thing that MAGA just doesn’t get:

Hunter won’t be pardoned.
No one will threaten the judge or jury.
There is no connection to Joe Biden. None.

Was it a political prosecution? Maybe, but no one is threatening to burn down the judiciary because Hunter was tried and convicted by a jury.


Correct. There is no connection to Joe Biden for the drug related offenses.

Now, for the tax evasion, Burisma and money laundering, there is.

No, there isn't. Comer and Jordan have been chasing that mirage for years and have NOTHNG to show for it. It's great theater though, which is really its only purpose.

There is no direct link but it’s hard not to read something like this and have your eyebrows raised.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/08/joe-biden-aides-family-business-dealings-00161476


"Ten percent for the big guy"


If there ever was a 10% for the big guy, it pales in comparison to the 2 billion presidential advisor Jared Kushner got from the Saudis.


Document this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The only thing remarkable about this case to me is that it’s apparently the first time in his life Hunter Biden has faced any real legal consequences living his life the way he lived it.


Agree.

Total liberal and I sort of feel sorry for him (loss of his mom/sister as a kid, followed by living in the shadow of the golden child) but he is pretty clearly getting what he deserves.


I don't feel sorry for Hunter, but I do feel sorry for the people who love him, especially his dad, to whom this will be a big blow given all his personal losses. I'm sure MAGA will revel in that pain.


Why do you feel bad for his dad? He is clearly the product of an upbringing where bad behavior gets indulged and no limits or consequences are ever enforced.

Except his first son was perfect, so….?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s the thing that MAGA just doesn’t get:

Hunter won’t be pardoned.
No one will threaten the judge or jury.
There is no connection to Joe Biden. None.

Was it a political prosecution? Maybe, but no one is threatening to burn down the judiciary because Hunter was tried and convicted by a jury.


Correct. There is no connection to Joe Biden for the drug related offenses.

Now, for the tax evasion, Burisma and money laundering, there is.

No, there isn't. Comer and Jordan have been chasing that mirage for years and have NOTHNG to show for it. It's great theater though, which is really its only purpose.


Even Politico is covering it now.

Biden insists he’s not involved in his family’s business dealings. But his aides are a different story.

The overlapping roles are under scrutiny as the president distances himself from his family’s dealings.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/08/joe-biden-aides-family-business-dealings-00161476


"Even Politico".
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.


And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.


And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.


Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."


Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.


Likely because they knew the specific photos and texts that the prosecution was submitting into evidence were real. But that doesn't mean everything else is authentic. When the WaPo analyzed a version of the laptop floating around found that some items could be verified, the vast majority could not, and that some items were in fact added after the fact. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/


Likely is just your guess, which is meaningless. You don’t have a scrap of proof that the laptop was tampered with.

The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states:

A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple.

https://abc3340.com/amp/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi


Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Hunter Biden filed a countersuit in a federal court on Friday against the owner of a Delaware computer repair shop, claiming its owner had no legal right to distribute his private information.


https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Yet Hunter can’t have the laptop analyzed and provide any evidence it was tampered with.

That would be the first thing he would do if that was the truth.

A bunch of adults simping for a crackhead who has spent a significant portion of his life buying prostitutes. How novel.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.


And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.


And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.


Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."


Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.


Likely because they knew the specific photos and texts that the prosecution was submitting into evidence were real. But that doesn't mean everything else is authentic. When the WaPo analyzed a version of the laptop floating around found that some items could be verified, the vast majority could not, and that some items were in fact added after the fact. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/


Likely is just your guess, which is meaningless. You don’t have a scrap of proof that the laptop was tampered with.

The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states:

A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple.

https://abc3340.com/amp/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi


Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Hunter Biden filed a countersuit in a federal court on Friday against the owner of a Delaware computer repair shop, claiming its owner had no legal right to distribute his private information.


https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Yet Hunter can’t have the laptop analyzed and provide any evidence it was tampered with.

That would be the first thing he would do if that was the truth.

A bunch of adults simping for a crackhead who has spent a significant portion of his life buying prostitutes. How novel.


The WaPo article documents an analysis by experts showing that in fact many folders were added well after it was out of Hunter's possession. So yes, there is a ton of evidence that it was tampered with.
Anonymous
For the first time, the Justice Department has confirmed that they took possession of a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden from a computer shop.

Why it matters: The new filing by special counsel David Weiss, which includes several embarrassing revelations, is the latest example of the increasingly antagonistic relationship between Hunter's team and his father's Justice Department in the months after a proposed plea deal unraveled last summer.
When some of the contents of the laptop's hard drive made it to The New York Post in the fall of 2020, President Biden and his supporters argued that the contents had the makings of a Russian disinformation campaign, and large social media companies suppressed or blocked access to the Post's article about it.

In the filing, Weiss wrote that in September 2019 Apple provided digital backups of Hunter's data in response to a search warrant and the laptop was "largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple investigators had already."

Spokespeople for the Justice Department and Hunter's lawyer Abbe Lowell did not respond to a request for comment.

https://www.axios.com/2024/01/17/hunter-biden-laptop-justice-department

So DOJ had Hunter’s information from Apple and the laptop confirmed it. And the laptop was confirmed by Apple.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s the thing that MAGA just doesn’t get:

Hunter won’t be pardoned.
No one will threaten the judge or jury.
There is no connection to Joe Biden. None.

Was it a political prosecution? Maybe, but no one is threatening to burn down the judiciary because Hunter was tried and convicted by a jury.


Correct. There is no connection to Joe Biden for the drug related offenses.

Now, for the tax evasion, Burisma and money laundering, there is.

No, there isn't. Comer and Jordan have been chasing that mirage for years and have NOTHNG to show for it. It's great theater though, which is really its only purpose.


Even Politico is covering it now.

Biden insists he’s not involved in his family’s business dealings. But his aides are a different story.

The overlapping roles are under scrutiny as the president distances himself from his family’s dealings.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/08/joe-biden-aides-family-business-dealings-00161476


"Even Politico".


Yes, because they're so far left of center and even they are covering it now.
Anonymous
Anonymous
The irony, huh?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s the thing that MAGA just doesn’t get:

Hunter won’t be pardoned.
No one will threaten the judge or jury.
There is no connection to Joe Biden. None.

Was it a political prosecution? Maybe, but no one is threatening to burn down the judiciary because Hunter was tried and convicted by a jury.


Correct. There is no connection to Joe Biden for the drug related offenses.

Now, for the tax evasion, Burisma and money laundering, there is.

No, there isn't. Comer and Jordan have been chasing that mirage for years and have NOTHNG to show for it. It's great theater though, which is really its only purpose.

There is no direct link but it’s hard not to read something like this and have your eyebrows raised.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/08/joe-biden-aides-family-business-dealings-00161476


"Ten percent for the big guy"


If there ever was a 10% for the big guy, it pales in comparison to the 2 billion presidential advisor Jared Kushner got from the Saudis.


All you are doing is normalizing blatant, unabashed corruption that corrodes any trust in the institution of the presidency.


How dare the son in law of a former president open an investment fund.

He should have been making paintings with his coke straw.


An investment fund with $2 billion in cash from the Saudis. Yeah, I'm sure that was on the up-and-up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.


And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.


And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.


Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."


Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.


Likely because they knew the specific photos and texts that the prosecution was submitting into evidence were real. But that doesn't mean everything else is authentic. When the WaPo analyzed a version of the laptop floating around found that some items could be verified, the vast majority could not, and that some items were in fact added after the fact. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/


Likely is just your guess, which is meaningless. You don’t have a scrap of proof that the laptop was tampered with.

The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states:

A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple.

https://abc3340.com/amp/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi


Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Hunter Biden filed a countersuit in a federal court on Friday against the owner of a Delaware computer repair shop, claiming its owner had no legal right to distribute his private information.


https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Yet Hunter can’t have the laptop analyzed and provide any evidence it was tampered with.

That would be the first thing he would do if that was the truth.

A bunch of adults simping for a crackhead who has spent a significant portion of his life buying prostitutes. How novel.


Adding three new folders to the public version of the drive named “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents" months after the FBI seized the original laptop seems a lot like tampering to me.

"Many questions about the drive remained impossible to answer definitively. That includes what happened during a nearly year-long period of apparent inactivity from September 2019 — about five months after Hunter Biden reportedly dropped off the laptop at the repair shop — until August 2020, when the presidential campaign involving his father was entering its final months.

Soon after that period of inactivity — and months after the laptop itself had been taken into FBI custody — three new folders were created on the drive. Dated Sept. 1 and 2, 2020, they bore the names “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents.”

Williams also found records on the drive that indicated someone may have accessed the drive from a West Coast location in October 2020, little more than a week after the first New York Post stories on Hunter Biden’s laptop appeared.
Over the next few days, somebody created three additional folders on the drive, titled, “Mail,” “Salacious Pics Package” and “Big Guy File” — an apparent reference to Joe Biden."

https://web.archive.org/web/20220331011754/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.


And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.


And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.


Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."


Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.


Likely because they knew the specific photos and texts that the prosecution was submitting into evidence were real. But that doesn't mean everything else is authentic. When the WaPo analyzed a version of the laptop floating around found that some items could be verified, the vast majority could not, and that some items were in fact added after the fact. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/


Likely is just your guess, which is meaningless. You don’t have a scrap of proof that the laptop was tampered with.

The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states:

A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple.

https://abc3340.com/amp/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi


Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Hunter Biden filed a countersuit in a federal court on Friday against the owner of a Delaware computer repair shop, claiming its owner had no legal right to distribute his private information.


https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Yet Hunter can’t have the laptop analyzed and provide any evidence it was tampered with.

That would be the first thing he would do if that was the truth.

A bunch of adults simping for a crackhead who has spent a significant portion of his life buying prostitutes. How novel.


The WaPo article documents an analysis by experts showing that in fact many folders were added well after it was out of Hunter's possession. So yes, there is a ton of evidence that it was tampered with.


1. Hunter’s legal team had an opportunity to submit evidence the laptop was tampered with and did not.

2. The laptop information was confirmed with the information the DOJ received from Apple.

Anonymous
Clearly this is a Potemkin village verdict. The real crime of the Biden kickback and FARA violations will never be tried due to the expired statute of limitation... Biden Inc will never be exposed
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: