Hunter Biden indicted on nine tax charges, adding to gun charges in special counsel probe

[Anonymous]

According to the tin-foil hat brigade, President Biden rigged the trial in order to distract from the American people from seeing that he's politicizing the justice system.

https://twitter.com/MattGertz/status/1800578711592341664

[Anonymous]

Love it.
Let’s go after everyone who lied on this form.
Prison and confiscation for everyone .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the thing that MAGA just doesn’t get:

Hunter won’t be pardoned.
No one will threaten the judge or jury.
There is no connection to Joe Biden. None.

Was it a political prosecution? Maybe, but no one is threatening to burn down the judiciary because Hunter was tried and convicted by a jury.

Correct. There is no connection to Joe Biden for the drug related offenses.

Now, for the tax evasion, Burisma and money laundering, there is.

No, there isn't. Comer and Jordan have been chasing that mirage for years and have NOTHNG to show for it. It's great theater though, which is really its only purpose.

Even Politico is covering it now.

Biden insists he’s not involved in his family’s business dealings. But his aides are a different story.

The overlapping roles are under scrutiny as the president distances himself from his family’s dealings.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/08/joe-biden-aides-family-business-dealings-00161476

"Even Politico".

Yes, because they're so far left of center and even they are covering it now.

NP. Hahahahaha. Oh wow, you guys really do live in an alternate reality

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the thing that MAGA just doesn’t get:

Hunter won’t be pardoned.
No one will threaten the judge or jury.
There is no connection to Joe Biden. None.

Was it a political prosecution? Maybe, but no one is threatening to burn down the judiciary because Hunter was tried and convicted by a jury.

Correct. There is no connection to Joe Biden for the drug related offenses.

Now, for the tax evasion, Burisma and money laundering, there is.

No, there isn't. Comer and Jordan have been chasing that mirage for years and have NOTHNG to show for it. It's great theater though, which is really its only purpose.

There is no direct link but it’s hard not to read something like this and have your eyebrows raised.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/08/joe-biden-aides-family-business-dealings-00161476

"Ten percent for the big guy"

If there ever was a 10% for the big guy, it pales in comparison to the 2 billion presidential advisor Jared Kushner got from the Saudis.

All you are doing is normalizing blatant, unabashed corruption that corrodes any trust in the institution of the presidency.

How dare the son in law of a former president open an investment fund.

He should have been making paintings with his coke straw.

An investment fund with $2 billion in cash from the Saudis. Yeah, I'm sure that was on the up-and-up.

And why is no one talking about this?:
In May, Kushner secured a massive $500 million contract with the state of Serbia to build a hotel on the memorialized ruins of a former military base in Belgrade, sparking protests in Belgrade against the deal. The contract is being bankrolled by Kushner's Saudi-backed investment company, Affinity Partners.

Basically, as part of the deal, Kushner will be funding a memorial to those killed by NATO bombings. It would be like him funding a memorial to WWII German soldiers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to the tin-foil hat brigade, President Biden rigged the trial in order to distract from the American people from seeing that he's politicizing the justice system.

https://twitter.com/MattGertz/status/1800578711592341664

I mean, the pure shamelessness of how these goal posts are moved to protect one person. Who only cares about himself and has stated so explicitly just recently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.

And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.

And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.

Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."

Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.

Likely because they knew the specific photos and texts that the prosecution was submitting into evidence were real. But that doesn't mean everything else is authentic. When the WaPo analyzed a version of the laptop floating around found that some items could be verified, the vast majority could not, and that some items were in fact added after the fact. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

Likely is just your guess, which is meaningless. You don’t have a scrap of proof that the laptop was tampered with.

The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states:

A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple.

https://abc3340.com/amp/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi


Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Hunter Biden filed a countersuit in a federal court on Friday against the owner of a Delaware computer repair shop, claiming its owner had no legal right to distribute his private information.


https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Yet Hunter can’t have the laptop analyzed and provide any evidence it was tampered with.

That would be the first thing he would do if that was the truth.

A bunch of adults simping for a crackhead who has spent a significant portion of his life buying prostitutes. How novel.

The WaPo article documents an analysis by experts showing that in fact many folders were added well after it was out of Hunter's possession. So yes, there is a ton of evidence that it was tampered with.

1. Hunter’s legal team had an opportunity to submit evidence the laptop was tampered with and did not.

2. The laptop information was confirmed with the information the DOJ received from Apple.

Why would Hunter's legal team analyze the public version of the drive, which is the one with all the files added to it?

[Anonymous]

I sentence Hunter Biden to one year and one day in the Club Fed resort: no fences, a beach, a bowling alley, several swimming pools, Ferris wheel and rides, happy ending massage parlor, a helluva surround sound theater, a chef and a bar tender.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.

And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.

And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.

Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."

Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.

Likely because they knew the specific photos and texts that the prosecution was submitting into evidence were real. But that doesn't mean everything else is authentic. When the WaPo analyzed a version of the laptop floating around found that some items could be verified, the vast majority could not, and that some items were in fact added after the fact. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

Likely is just your guess, which is meaningless. You don’t have a scrap of proof that the laptop was tampered with.

The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states:

A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple.

https://abc3340.com/amp/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi


Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Hunter Biden filed a countersuit in a federal court on Friday against the owner of a Delaware computer repair shop, claiming its owner had no legal right to distribute his private information.


https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Yet Hunter can’t have the laptop analyzed and provide any evidence it was tampered with.

That would be the first thing he would do if that was the truth.

A bunch of adults simping for a crackhead who has spent a significant portion of his life buying prostitutes. How novel.

Adding three new folders to the public version of the drive named “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents" months after the FBI seized the original laptop seems a lot like tampering to me.

"Many questions about the drive remained impossible to answer definitively. That includes what happened during a nearly year-long period of apparent inactivity from September 2019 — about five months after Hunter Biden reportedly dropped off the laptop at the repair shop — until August 2020, when the presidential campaign involving his father was entering its final months.

Soon after that period of inactivity — and months after the laptop itself had been taken into FBI custody — three new folders were created on the drive. Dated Sept. 1 and 2, 2020, they bore the names “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents.”

Williams also found records on the drive that indicated someone may have accessed the drive from a West Coast location in October 2020, little more than a week after the first New York Post stories on Hunter Biden’s laptop appeared.
Over the next few days, somebody created three additional folders on the drive, titled, “Mail,” “Salacious Pics Package” and “Big Guy File” — an apparent reference to Joe Biden."

https://web.archive.org/web/20220331011754/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

Apple confirmed the laptop matched the information they had. Give up, it’s embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clearly this is a Potemkin village verdict. The real crime of the Biden kickback and FARA violations will never be tried due to the expired statute of limitation... Biden Inc will never be exposed

Because Biden Inc doesn't exist except in your imagination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.

And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.

And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.

Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."

Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.

Likely because they knew the specific photos and texts that the prosecution was submitting into evidence were real. But that doesn't mean everything else is authentic. When the WaPo analyzed a version of the laptop floating around found that some items could be verified, the vast majority could not, and that some items were in fact added after the fact. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

Likely is just your guess, which is meaningless. You don’t have a scrap of proof that the laptop was tampered with.

The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states:

A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple.

https://abc3340.com/amp/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi


Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Hunter Biden filed a countersuit in a federal court on Friday against the owner of a Delaware computer repair shop, claiming its owner had no legal right to distribute his private information.


https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Yet Hunter can’t have the laptop analyzed and provide any evidence it was tampered with.

That would be the first thing he would do if that was the truth.

A bunch of adults simping for a crackhead who has spent a significant portion of his life buying prostitutes. How novel.

Adding three new folders to the public version of the drive named “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents" months after the FBI seized the original laptop seems a lot like tampering to me.

"Many questions about the drive remained impossible to answer definitively. That includes what happened during a nearly year-long period of apparent inactivity from September 2019 — about five months after Hunter Biden reportedly dropped off the laptop at the repair shop — until August 2020, when the presidential campaign involving his father was entering its final months.

Soon after that period of inactivity — and months after the laptop itself had been taken into FBI custody — three new folders were created on the drive. Dated Sept. 1 and 2, 2020, they bore the names “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents.”

Williams also found records on the drive that indicated someone may have accessed the drive from a West Coast location in October 2020, little more than a week after the first New York Post stories on Hunter Biden’s laptop appeared.
Over the next few days, somebody created three additional folders on the drive, titled, “Mail,” “Salacious Pics Package” and “Big Guy File” — an apparent reference to Joe Biden."

https://web.archive.org/web/20220331011754/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

Apple confirmed the laptop matched the information they had. Give up, it’s embarrassing.

Absolutely nothing in the trial concerned the versions of the laptop that are floating around in public. The WAPO did analyze one of those versions. Can you dispute those findings?

[Anonymous]

Waiting for Biden's statement about the rigged and very unfair trial and insulting the judge and the jury! When can we expect that?

[Anonymous]

SO GLAD THAT REPUBLICANS NOW SUPPORT GUN CONTROL!!!!

Let's go after all gun owners who lie on their forms and who use drugs while owning a gun. Can I get an AMEN?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.

And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.

And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.

Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."

Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.

Likely because they knew the specific photos and texts that the prosecution was submitting into evidence were real. But that doesn't mean everything else is authentic. When the WaPo analyzed a version of the laptop floating around found that some items could be verified, the vast majority could not, and that some items were in fact added after the fact. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

Likely is just your guess, which is meaningless. You don’t have a scrap of proof that the laptop was tampered with.

The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states:

A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple.

https://abc3340.com/amp/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi


Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Hunter Biden filed a countersuit in a federal court on Friday against the owner of a Delaware computer repair shop, claiming its owner had no legal right to distribute his private information.


https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Yet Hunter can’t have the laptop analyzed and provide any evidence it was tampered with.

That would be the first thing he would do if that was the truth.

A bunch of adults simping for a crackhead who has spent a significant portion of his life buying prostitutes. How novel.

Adding three new folders to the public version of the drive named “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents" months after the FBI seized the original laptop seems a lot like tampering to me.

"Many questions about the drive remained impossible to answer definitively. That includes what happened during a nearly year-long period of apparent inactivity from September 2019 — about five months after Hunter Biden reportedly dropped off the laptop at the repair shop — until August 2020, when the presidential campaign involving his father was entering its final months.

Soon after that period of inactivity — and months after the laptop itself had been taken into FBI custody — three new folders were created on the drive. Dated Sept. 1 and 2, 2020, they bore the names “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents.”

Williams also found records on the drive that indicated someone may have accessed the drive from a West Coast location in October 2020, little more than a week after the first New York Post stories on Hunter Biden’s laptop appeared.
Over the next few days, somebody created three additional folders on the drive, titled, “Mail,” “Salacious Pics Package” and “Big Guy File” — an apparent reference to Joe Biden."

https://web.archive.org/web/20220331011754/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

Apple confirmed the laptop matched the information they had. Give up, it’s embarrassing.

Absolutely nothing in the trial concerned the versions of the laptop that are floating around in public. The WAPO did analyze one of those versions. Can you dispute those findings?

Federal prosecutors further acknowledged in court documents filed Tuesday that the laptop Hunter Biden dropped off at a computer store is in fact real, adding that the contents on the laptop matched what had previously been obtained through a search warrant on the president’s son’s Apple iCloud.

In the court documents, the Department of Justice said the IRS and FBI obtained a search warrant for tax violations in August 2019 and were able to get access to Hunter’s Apple iCloud account.

By September 2021, Apple produced backups of data from various electronic devices Hunter backed up to his iCloud account.


For the first time, the Justice Department confirmed taking possession of a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden from a computer shop.

A DOJ filing tracks the story told by Delaware-based John Paul Mac Isaac, who owned a computer repair shop and claimed Hunter Biden left behind a laptop. Weiss wrote that in September 2019 Apple provided digital backups of Hunter's data in response to a search warrant and the laptop was "largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple investigators."

https://www.ncja.org/crimeandjusticenews/doj-confirms-taking-possession-of-hunter-biden-s-laptop

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SO GLAD THAT REPUBLICANS NOW SUPPORT GUN CONTROL!!!!

Let's go after all gun owners who lie on their forms and who use drugs while owning a gun. Can I get an AMEN?

Would love to see Biden announce that he's setting up a task force to specifically go after people who lie on their gun purchase forms. I'm sure all of the GOP would support that, right guys?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So she didn’t know what exactly happened to it before the FBI got it.

And she also did no analysis to try to figure it out.

And Hunter’s legal team didn’t do any analysis to show any evidence the laptop was tampered with.

You know why? Because they would have spent a boatload of cash on a useless analysis because Hunter told his attorneys that was his laptop.

Great, glad you've now conceded that the FBI agent did not in fact testify to the authenticity of everything on "the laptop."

Why didn’t Hunter’s legal team have the laptop analyzed and submit the evidence and proof to the court?

If they had done that it could have bolstered his case greatly.

Likely because they knew the specific photos and texts that the prosecution was submitting into evidence were real. But that doesn't mean everything else is authentic. When the WaPo analyzed a version of the laptop floating around found that some items could be verified, the vast majority could not, and that some items were in fact added after the fact. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

Likely is just your guess, which is meaningless. You don’t have a scrap of proof that the laptop was tampered with.

The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states:

A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple.

https://abc3340.com/amp/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi


Hunter Biden sues laptop repair shop owner, alleging invasion of privacy

https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Hunter Biden filed a countersuit in a federal court on Friday against the owner of a Delaware computer repair shop, claiming its owner had no legal right to distribute his private information.


https://www.axios.com/2023/03/17/hunter-biden-laptop-repair-store-counter-lawsuit

Yet Hunter can’t have the laptop analyzed and provide any evidence it was tampered with.

That would be the first thing he would do if that was the truth.

A bunch of adults simping for a crackhead who has spent a significant portion of his life buying prostitutes. How novel.

Adding three new folders to the public version of the drive named “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents" months after the FBI seized the original laptop seems a lot like tampering to me.

"Many questions about the drive remained impossible to answer definitively. That includes what happened during a nearly year-long period of apparent inactivity from September 2019 — about five months after Hunter Biden reportedly dropped off the laptop at the repair shop — until August 2020, when the presidential campaign involving his father was entering its final months.

Soon after that period of inactivity — and months after the laptop itself had been taken into FBI custody — three new folders were created on the drive. Dated Sept. 1 and 2, 2020, they bore the names “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents.”

Williams also found records on the drive that indicated someone may have accessed the drive from a West Coast location in October 2020, little more than a week after the first New York Post stories on Hunter Biden’s laptop appeared.
Over the next few days, somebody created three additional folders on the drive, titled, “Mail,” “Salacious Pics Package” and “Big Guy File” — an apparent reference to Joe Biden."

https://web.archive.org/web/20220331011754/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

Apple confirmed the laptop matched the information they had. Give up, it’s embarrassing.

Absolutely nothing in the trial concerned the versions of the laptop that are floating around in public. The WAPO did analyze one of those versions. Can you dispute those findings?

Federal prosecutors further acknowledged in court documents filed Tuesday that the laptop Hunter Biden dropped off at a computer store is in fact real, adding that the contents on the laptop matched what had previously been obtained through a search warrant on the president’s son’s Apple iCloud.

In the court documents, the Department of Justice said the IRS and FBI obtained a search warrant for tax violations in August 2019 and were able to get access to Hunter’s Apple iCloud account.

By September 2021, Apple produced backups of data from various electronic devices Hunter backed up to his iCloud account.


For the first time, the Justice Department confirmed taking possession of a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden from a computer shop.

A DOJ filing tracks the story told by Delaware-based John Paul Mac Isaac, who owned a computer repair shop and claimed Hunter Biden left behind a laptop. Weiss wrote that in September 2019 Apple provided digital backups of Hunter's data in response to a search warrant and the laptop was "largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple investigators."

https://www.ncja.org/crimeandjusticenews/doj-confirms-taking-possession-of-hunter-biden-s-laptop

And?