The Karen meme silences White women

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Nope. Read the thread from the beginning. Check out the multiple ways people are defining Karen. You don’t have a monopoly on definitions, and trying to impose one on the rest of us sounds like what you’re calling a Karen.

Nice rule you just made up, that you can post multiple times, but when anybody else does you call it “sock puppeting.” Sounds like what you’re calling a Karen. Also, there are multiple people arguing with you.

What’s really hilarious is that you’ve pushed back for 3 pages now on people calling you a Karen. You don’t like it, do you? You don’t think it applies to you, do you? Sounds just like what you’re calling a Karen.

Care to explain why your panties are in a twist over being called a Karen? We’ll wait.

It’s very clear there is no “we,” it’s just you. You aren’t clever. You are very clearly sock puppeting.

Never said I had a monopoly on definitions. The media’s definition, along with provided examples, are proof enough. You want to twist definitions to fit your narrative go right ahead.

Once again, not people, just you. And like I said previously, I don’t care if you try to use Karen as an insult to me; even though you claim no one should be using the term. You’re a hypocrite, that much is very clear. Karen doesn’t hurt me, even if you want it to. It does seem to hurt you, even though I never called you one.

Seems like your panties are so twisted you are seething with rage. Care to explain why you are constantly using the very term you claim to be fighting against? We’ll wait.

LOL no, I'm not "seething with rage," although according to your definitions, that's a very Karen thing of you to say.

If you think there's just one of us, you haven't been following the thread. And when you claim there's a "media" definition that aligns with your definition, you haven't been following the thread.

Still waiting to hear why you don't like being called a Karen yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would I like to be called a Karen ? No.
Do I consider others before speaking? Generally yes.
If I was inconsiderate and/or exerting my privilege in a crappy way would I like to ge called out? Yes, even if it was difficult in the moment. To me, “Karen” is a short cut to shutting down that white nonsense. It stings, because it should.

You’re making Karen a race thing. That’s not how most people use it. Go back to the beginning of the thread where people are calling OP a Karen because, they say, she shouldn’t even criticize dangerous (COVID risk) services. That’s the problem.

Also, making it about women is misogynistic. Men are racists too, but we don’t have names for them (besides “Trump” and “Miller”).

Call a racist a racist.

Umm...Karen is used to describe privileged, angry, white women talking down to people. Where have you been?

Umm, it's used to describe any middle-aged white woman who complains, no matter how reasonably, about service. OP is a case in point, and she didn't even complain, she just thought about doing it. Where have you been?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Well let’s see, here you are yet again, screaming bc someone isn’t agreeing with you. Here you are screaming bc you are being called out for your hypocrisy. No, I called out you, only you. And I have no problem saying that (even though you think I do).

You definitely tried to make a definition for Karen and you’re very clearly pissed not everyone agrees with your definition. You continually use Karen as an insult after trying so hard to fight against using it. You continually sock puppet and think you are clever. You have used more insults in your comments then anyone else. Carry on trolling though. It’s a pandemic, not much to do now anyway.

Nope. Read the thread from the beginning. Check out the multiple ways people are defining Karen. You don’t have a monopoly on definitions, and trying to impose one on the rest of us sounds like what you’re calling a Karen.

Nice rule you just made up, that you can post multiple times, but when anybody else does you call it “sock puppeting.” Sounds like what you’re calling a Karen. Also, there are multiple people arguing with you.

What’s really hilarious is that you’ve pushed back for 3 pages now on people calling you a Karen. You don’t like it, do you? You don’t think it applies to you, do you? Sounds just like what you’re calling a Karen.

Care to explain why your panties are in a twist over being called a Karen? We’ll wait.

It’s very clear there is no “we,” it’s just you. You aren’t clever. You are very clearly sock puppeting.

Never said I had a monopoly on definitions. The media’s definition, along with provided examples, are proof enough. You want to twist definitions to fit your narrative go right ahead.

Once again, not people, just you. And like I said previously, I don’t care if you try to use Karen as an insult to me; even though you claim no one should be using the term. You’re a hypocrite, that much is very clear. Karen doesn’t hurt me, even if you want it to. It does seem to hurt you, even though I never called you one.

Seems like your panties are so twisted you are seething with rage. Care to explain why you are constantly using the very term you claim to be fighting against? We’ll wait.

Dear pp: responding to your posts isn't "sock puppetting."

[Anonymous]

For a group of people “being silenced”, 46 pages of thread seems to suggest otherwise.

Drama queens.

[Anonymous]

Well, anyway I’ll be a Karen for social justice and I encourage you to join me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would I like to be called a Karen ? No.
Do I consider others before speaking? Generally yes.
If I was inconsiderate and/or exerting my privilege in a crappy way would I like to ge called out? Yes, even if it was difficult in the moment. To me, “Karen” is a short cut to shutting down that white nonsense. It stings, because it should.

You’re making Karen a race thing. That’s not how most people use it. Go back to the beginning of the thread where people are calling OP a Karen because, they say, she shouldn’t even criticize dangerous (COVID risk) services. That’s the problem.

Also, making it about women is misogynistic. Men are racists too, but we don’t have names for them (besides “Trump” and “Miller”).

Call a racist a racist.

Umm...Karen is used to describe privileged, angry, white women talking down to people. Where have you been?

Umm, it's used to describe any middle-aged white woman who complains, no matter how reasonably, about service. OP is a case in point, and she didn't even complain, she just thought about doing it. Where have you been?

That’s your definition. That isn’t the definition anywhere else other than DCUM. Nice try though.

[Anonymous]

Whatever.

Use the word 'Karen' as described above in a conversation and I don't take you seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Nope. Read the thread from the beginning. Check out the multiple ways people are defining Karen. You don’t have a monopoly on definitions, and trying to impose one on the rest of us sounds like what you’re calling a Karen.

Nice rule you just made up, that you can post multiple times, but when anybody else does you call it “sock puppeting.” Sounds like what you’re calling a Karen. Also, there are multiple people arguing with you.

What’s really hilarious is that you’ve pushed back for 3 pages now on people calling you a Karen. You don’t like it, do you? You don’t think it applies to you, do you? Sounds just like what you’re calling a Karen.

Care to explain why your panties are in a twist over being called a Karen? We’ll wait.

It’s very clear there is no “we,” it’s just you. You aren’t clever. You are very clearly sock puppeting.

Never said I had a monopoly on definitions. The media’s definition, along with provided examples, are proof enough. You want to twist definitions to fit your narrative go right ahead.

Once again, not people, just you. And like I said previously, I don’t care if you try to use Karen as an insult to me; even though you claim no one should be using the term. You’re a hypocrite, that much is very clear. Karen doesn’t hurt me, even if you want it to. It does seem to hurt you, even though I never called you one.

Seems like your panties are so twisted you are seething with rage. Care to explain why you are constantly using the very term you claim to be fighting against? We’ll wait.

LOL no, I'm not "seething with rage," although according to your definitions, that's a very Karen thing of you to say.

If you think there's just one of us, you haven't been following the thread. And when you claim there's a "media" definition that aligns with your definition, you haven't been following the thread.

Still waiting to hear why you don't like being called a Karen yourself.

Been following the thread and you popped up screaming very loudly. You even took it over to the other thread with the video examples. You really aren’t clever. Your writing and is consistent. Along with your hypocrisy (which you continually gloss over when called out).

You also cannot seem to read. So I’ll say it yet again, I don’t care if you try to use Karen as an insult to me; even though you claim no one should be using the term. You’re a hypocrite, that much is very clear. Karen doesn’t hurt me, even if you want it to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whatever.

Use the word 'Karen' as described above in a conversation and I don't take you seriously.

Like you taking someone seriously is important on a DCUM thread. 😂😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL no, I'm not "seething with rage," although according to your definitions, that's a very Karen thing of you to say.

If you think there's just one of us, you haven't been following the thread. And when you claim there's a "media" definition that aligns with your definition, you haven't been following the thread.

Still waiting to hear why you don't like being called a Karen yourself.

Been following the thread and you popped up screaming very loudly. You even took it over to the other thread with the video examples. You really aren’t clever. Your writing and is consistent. Along with your hypocrisy (which you continually gloss over when called out).

You also cannot seem to read. So I’ll say it yet again, I don’t care if you try to use Karen as an insult to me; even though you claim no one should be using the term. You’re a hypocrite, that much is very clear. Karen doesn’t hurt me, even if you want it to.

Nope. You're the dog with a bone who can't let go. You're apparently butthurt that you're being called a Karen. The fact that you're butthurt is obvious from the fact that you can't stop responding, even though you claim you don't care.

How many times have you posted on this thread so far? Yet you're calling others sock puppets. If you weren't sockpuppetting, excuse me, posting so much yourself, nobody would suspect you actually cared about being called a Karen.

Still waiting to hear why you can't stand being called something you want to apply to others....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For a group of people “being silenced”, 46 pages of thread seems to suggest otherwise.

Drama queens.

LOL.

Social justice is more fun when it’s someone else being raked over the coals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Ohhh, now I get it. Conservative pp who loves "Karen" labels doesn't want to call her conservative president a racist or a jerk. To her, Trump is just a little "extra"; Trump is a "Karen."

Which proves the point that "Karen" is being used very broadly, from simply complainers ... to those who are "extra" ... to those who are straight-up racists or jerks.

Conservative pp is calling people idiots for not accepting her broad definition. Which makes her a Karen, I guess.

So, Conservative Karen, how do you like being lumped in with the racist Karens? Judging by how you're desperately denying you're a Karen, I'd guess you don't like it very much.

You will just as desperately deny been labeled a pedophile because you are not.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Umm, it's used to describe any middle-aged white woman who complains, no matter how reasonably, about service. OP is a case in point, and she didn't even complain, she just thought about doing it. Where have you been?

That’s your definition. That isn’t the definition anywhere else other than DCUM. Nice try though.

Did you miss the tweet with Trump in Karen hair? Did you miss the reaction to OP? That wasn't coming out of nowhere. Nice try though.

You conservatives just love calling people Karens. Yet you want to limit the definition to something that works for you. Sorry, it doesn't work that way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ohhh, now I get it. Conservative pp who loves "Karen" labels doesn't want to call her conservative president a racist or a jerk. To her, Trump is just a little "extra"; Trump is a "Karen."

Which proves the point that "Karen" is being used very broadly, from simply complainers ... to those who are "extra" ... to those who are straight-up racists or jerks.

Conservative pp is calling people idiots for not accepting her broad definition. Which makes her a Karen, I guess.

So, Conservative Karen, how do you like being lumped in with the racist Karens? Judging by how you're desperately denying you're a Karen, I'd guess you don't like it very much.

You will just as desperately deny been labeled a pedophile because you are not.
DP

Which is the problem in a nutshell. Conservative pp desperately denies being a Karen because she thinks she's not. Even though her definition keeps changing: now it's a white woman, now it's Trump.

Even though she herself is apparently a white woman telling others how to define a "Karen", which is the most basic definition of a Karen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For a group of people “being silenced”, 46 pages of thread seems to suggest otherwise.

Drama queens.

DCUM's conservatives just don't know when to quit. They want to call other people "Karens" while using a selective definition that excludes themselves. And post about their god-given right to do so again.and.again.and.again.and.again.