Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:2025 did well this weekend (4-1) in the A division. But they scored few goals against two good teams, indicating their attack remains weak, for all that they clobbered three terrible teams.
2027 went 0-5 in the AA division - should have put them in A as well. Also very weak on attack.
Have you watched these teams? I don't have a kid on them, but a lack of scoring doesn't mean the attack stinks. It very well might. But it might also mean they struggle to get the ball to their attack.
Your comment would be more insightful if it was based on observation and not guessing based on seeing scores.
Yes. 2025 has an outstanding FOGO. They usually win the F/O. But their attack still can’t put points on the board against a competent D. Way too many dropped passes for their age and experience level.
2027 has many more problems. They don’t win F/O and their stick skills are abysmal especially weak-hand passing and catching.
Seems like a you're a parent - can you share your player's position since you're comfortable w/ critiquing MS and ES kids? 2027s have some promising kids with lots of good coaching - is your kid a new edition ? Find another team.. oh that's right... taking anonymous potshots at kids is easier.
Is it going to make it suddenly untrue that these teams have weak attack if you know my name, DOB, SSN, and cell number? Will that add 5 points to every game they played in the last two tournaments?
No. These facts speak for themselves. Everyone who watches these teams knows it's true.
If I am a parent then I
want these teams to have good attack. I sincerely hope these kids get better.