Who is right? Son accidentally took item - disagreement results

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

damn why the anger? Just don't respond if you don't want to answer.

Not the person your are responding to, however if you can't be bothered to read the thread yourself why bother clicking on it. And do you REALLY trust other people's reading comprehension skills to give you an accurate update that isn't missing info or swapping info - which happened numerous times in this thread. It's just kind of lazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

damn why the anger? Just don't respond if you don't want to answer.

Not the person your are responding to, however if you can't be bothered to read the thread yourself why bother clicking on it. And do you REALLY trust other people's reading comprehension skills to give you an accurate update that isn't missing info or swapping info - which happened numerous times in this thread. It's just kind of lazy.

'

eh 44 pages - not reading thru the whole thing no. if you can't be bothered to help (which others did by pointing out the page with the update) then don't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

damn why the anger? Just don't respond if you don't want to answer.

Not the person your are responding to, however if you can't be bothered to read the thread yourself why bother clicking on it. And do you REALLY trust other people's reading comprehension skills to give you an accurate update that isn't missing info or swapping info - which happened numerous times in this thread. It's just kind of lazy.

'

eh 44 pages - not reading thru the whole thing no. if you can't be bothered to help (which others did by pointing out the page with the update) then don't.

How is it "helping"? Helping is walking an old lady across the street. Your idea of "help" is weird. It's more like entitled someone to be lazy and entitled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

damn why the anger? Just don't respond if you don't want to answer.

Not the person your are responding to, however if you can't be bothered to read the thread yourself why bother clicking on it. And do you REALLY trust other people's reading comprehension skills to give you an accurate update that isn't missing info or swapping info - which happened numerous times in this thread. It's just kind of lazy.

'

eh 44 pages - not reading thru the whole thing no. if you can't be bothered to help (which others did by pointing out the page with the update) then don't.

How is it "helping"? Helping is walking an old lady across the street. Your idea of "help" is weird. It's more like entitled someone to be lazy and entitled.

ok I'm lazy and entitled - sorry to offend you so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

damn why the anger? Just don't respond if you don't want to answer.

Not the person your are responding to, however if you can't be bothered to read the thread yourself why bother clicking on it. And do you REALLY trust other people's reading comprehension skills to give you an accurate update that isn't missing info or swapping info - which happened numerous times in this thread. It's just kind of lazy.

'

eh 44 pages - not reading thru the whole thing no. if you can't be bothered to help (which others did by pointing out the page with the update) then don't.

Based on your laziness and wanting others to do the work for you, I'm guessing you're Team OP.

[Anonymous]

Hold up. Are people still talking about a kid's bathing suit??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hold up. Are people still talking about a kid's bathing suit??

no they are arguing about whether I should've asked someone what the update was from OP. Only on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hold up. Are people still talking about a kid's bathing suit??

This was never about a bathing suit. It's about doing what's right vs doing what's convenient. I'm not surprised by the outcome of the divide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold up. Are people still talking about a kid's bathing suit??

This was never about a bathing suit. It's about doing what's right vs doing what's convenient. I'm not surprised by the outcome of the divide.

SURE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold up. Are people still talking about a kid's bathing suit??

This was never about a bathing suit. It's about doing what's right vs doing what's convenient. I'm not surprised by the outcome of the divide.

Sometimes things aren't that black and white. Sorry it's so hard for you to see that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold up. Are people still talking about a kid's bathing suit??

This was never about a bathing suit. It's about doing what's right vs doing what's convenient. I'm not surprised by the outcome of the divide.

You views about "right" are interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You should have driven it to them. Your son took it, his mistake. It sucks but that is what you should have done.

This. Your post is all about your woes. But your son did this. Find a store where they are going and email her a $25 gift card. $30 if you got it so they can get a splash toy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hold up. Are people still talking about a kid's bathing suit??

This was never about a bathing suit. It's about doing what's right vs doing what's convenient. I'm not surprised by the outcome of the divide.

Sometimes things aren't that black and white. Sorry it's so hard for you to see that.

Actually, it is. But, people will say anything to justify being assholes.

[Anonymous]

This thread is like free therapy. It's bringing out dormant issues in people. Air it out fellas

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

damn why the anger? Just don't respond if you don't want to answer.

Not the person your are responding to, however if you can't be bothered to read the thread yourself why bother clicking on it. And do you REALLY trust other people's reading comprehension skills to give you an accurate update that isn't missing info or swapping info - which happened numerous times in this thread. It's just kind of lazy.

'

eh 44 pages - not reading thru the whole thing no. if you can't be bothered to help (which others did by pointing out the page with the update) then don't.

How is it "helping"? Helping is walking an old lady across the street. Your idea of "help" is weird. It's more like entitled someone to be lazy and entitled.

New poster - are you seriously calling someone 'entitled' because they're asking for info you know? So if someone said, "hey, what was that book about?" would you say JUST READ IT YOURSELF!! rather than giving a quick summary?

IT'S A WEB THREAD ABOUT A KID'S BATHING SUIT. GET OVER YOURSELF!!