Who is right? Son accidentally took item - disagreement results

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take is that swimsuit mom was already mad at OP (for not coming to the party, it seems like? Something else?) and the accidental swimsuit swap was adding insult to injury. Swimsuit Mom could have made the drive herself if it was really important, or borrowed a swimsuit from a local friend/relative, or bought a new swimsuit locally that evening or on the way to the beach (yes there are old navys and targets and various other strip mall stores between here and NJ), or had the kid wear athletic shorts, or a million other things. I think her pre-existing annoyance at OP led her to demand that OP drive the swimsuit back that night with a baby in tow - otherwise she would have said "Oh next week is fine" and utilized one of the many other options.

OP, why do you think swimsuit mom was so angry at you BEFORE the mix-up?

Really? Who cares why someone is completely irrational.

Why would swimsuit mom care if OP didn't go to someone else's party?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think you are being ridiculous. Your kid screwed up, and you should have made it right. Your entire message screams "me! Me! Me!" I don't want to drive 50 minutes. I don't want to wake the baby.

People like you are why this site has "I hate living here" threads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

[Anonymous]

I would have told the bitch to go eff herself and if she wanted her cheap mass produced trunks from China she can come by and get them. This whole thread is so absurd. WTF is wrong with people???

[Anonymous]

[b]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think you are being ridiculous. Your kid screwed up, and you should have made it right. Your entire message screams "me! Me! Me!" I don't want to drive 50 minutes. I don't want to wake the baby.

People like you are why this site has "I hate living here" threads.

Plus infinity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

You can read the thread for the update, but for tuna lady:

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/547143.page

I kind of think that Jeff should start another sticky linking classic threads for newcomers, but it's probably more fun for people to learn over time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

You can read the thread for the update, but for tuna lady:

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/547143.page

I kind of think that Jeff should start another sticky linking classic threads for newcomers, but it's probably more fun for people to learn over time.

I'd like an update too. How did the swimsuit "trutherism" pan out? I'm too lazy to go back and read through it. Nor do I particularly want to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

You can read the thread for the update, but for tuna lady:

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/547143.page

I kind of think that Jeff should start another sticky linking classic threads for newcomers, but it's probably mo

re fun for people to learn over time.

Look at previous page (44) someone quoted it calling troll.
I'd like an update too. How did the swimsuit "trutherism" pan out? I'm too lazy to go back and read through it. Nor do I particularly want to.

[Anonymous]

Update was around page 30.

And my 6 yo only has one suit. He wears it, we wash it, he wears it the next day or whenever he needs it. We can afford another suit, but he's going to outgrow it by next summer so why bother? (That said, if it got accidentally taken or whatever, that would be my cue to go get another...)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Update was around page 30.

And my 6 yo only has one suit. He wears it, we wash it, he wears it the next day or whenever he needs it. We can afford another suit, but he's going to outgrow it by next summer so why bother? (That said, if it got accidentally taken or whatever, that would be my cue to go get another...)

DHs swimsuit got stolen at the Y. Both of us were pissed. We can obviously afford another suit, but there is just something about someone taking something that isn't there's. Plus the inconvenience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can Jeff tell us if OP was a troll, please?

How would Jeff know if this event actually happened or not? Do you think he was at the pool party or was hanging out with OP helping her move patio furniture? LOL

Plot twist

Jeff's wife is swimsuit mom!?

Jeff is out of town dad. Better plot twist.

my

I believe Jeff is the dog-walking dad who stopped to gossip that evening with the patio furniture mover.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

Exactly....and at one point, I did copy and paste the update so one didn't have to dig that far for it.

Seriously, because a thread is so many pages doesn't mean it takes forever to read. Do you read 500 page books? Do you read them in one day? I bet some people on this site do. Same principle applies here.

[Anonymous]

Update is quoted near the bottom of page 44.

I believe it! It's so out there, that I think it's true!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone actually believe this story after the update?

I don't.

What was the update? I can't search thru 44 pages for it. And who is tuna lady??

Why should we enable your laziness?

Read the God damn thread if you really want to know.

damn why the anger? Just don't respond if you don't want to answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Update is quoted near the bottom of page 44.

I believe it! It's so out there, that I think it's true!

thanks - I don't think that troll post had been posted when I last checked last night.