Whistleblower accuses Biden of criminal conduct

Anonymous
Anonymous
The mueller investigation cost 32 million

But it made 48 million.


So….
Anonymous
This exactly. They have nothing credible so they want to unearth and whitewash the BS as if it is. As posted earlier, any idiot crackpot can accuse someone of something and an agent will write up and file a 1023.
Anonymous
Nailed it

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Nailed it



Nope, you don't have it right.
Anonymous






Anonymous
So it’s obviously nothing if the FBI that got Trump elected has had this since 2017.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Nailed it



As much as the chocolate ripple cake on the show of the same name.

IOW, no, not nailed.
Anonymous
So the supposedly reliable source said there was a “foreign national who claimed to have bribed Biden.”

Was the foreign national also reliable? Or was he an idiot crackpot who made a false claim?

Bill Barr’s DOJ said it was the latter. Now three years later the House GOP wants to publicize a foreign national’s claim despite it having been investigated and cleared.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Nailed it



+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:







Their story isn't even internally consistent. They complain the FBI closed the investigation in 2020 (which they complain was too short), but also claim there is still an ongoing investigation about the allegation. And that's putting aside the same people who say the FBI should never investigate the president's political opponent during an election, and especially not based on a hearsay allegation.
Anonymous
Which is worse - using fake information to tank a duly elected president or claiming information was fully vetted while the FBI says otherwise?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:







Their story isn't even internally consistent. They complain the FBI closed the investigation in 2020 (which they complain was too short), but also claim there is still an ongoing investigation about the allegation. And that's putting aside the same people who say the FBI should never investigate the president's political opponent during an election, and especially not based on a hearsay allegation.


The deep state never sleeps!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - using fake information to tank a duly elected president or claiming information was fully vetted while the FBI says otherwise?


The FBI director announcing an investigation of one nominee based on no new evidence a few days before the election, thereby gifting the election to the other nominee who also was under investigation but that one was not disclosed.
Anonymous

Another round of garbage where the right wing lawmakers push the crazy for their own ends without believing in it, but moron MAGAs swallow it whole and maybe one of them ends up doing something drastic.

Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: