Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
I support masking. My kids will mask. Let your kids get it. I’m fine with your kids getting it, just not mine. |
Well, to be fair, they have met one of the off-ramp metrics from MSDE. And considering the mandate was created by the MSDE (and not the dept of health), you could argue that it never should have been there in the first place |
NP, but honestly, you're not being very clear. You say you support masking but in the prior post you say that one-way masking doesnt work and KN95s aren't reliable. So what is that you want? Everyone in scuba gear? |
Now you are saying that masks protect your child, but not anyone else who might be vulnerable and wearing a high-quality mask? |
Yeah, this person is all over the place. In one breathe they say: one-way masking doesn't work! then moments later they say: fine, don't put a mask on your kid. mine will be masked and won't get sick. they are just spun up into a tizzy. |
This is exactly the way it should be. Thank you. I'll let my kids "get it," (except they already had it, so there's that lol). |
We had all of those positives with two way masking. By your logic, two way masking doesn’t work either. |
This is a serious question, what cover ups do you think have happened? Some one is suppressing case counts? That’s a new one for me. Obviously case rate data is imperfect since many people are asymptomatic and/or test at home. There are multiple models to account for these known sources of error, some of which are better than others in terms of thoroughness. But in height think trends hold up fairly well. As do hospitalization rates and measures of hospital capacity, both of which I would argue are far more important than a perfect case count. I’d be happy with a metric based on hospitalization rates or hospital capacity for that matter. But the idea we can’t even talk about getting masks off our kids with our name calling (despite under 6s never masking in most of the world and under 12s never masking in many countries with very little differences in outcomes) is …well it’s not encouraging. |
We are not talking hospitalizations we are talking transmission. I don’t care about hospitalizations, I care transmissions and positives. I care your family doesn’t care and will give it to my family. Do you not get that it can be a big deal for other families and their lives don’t just revolve around your wants and entitlement. |
It’s not funny your kids got Covid. What kind of parent are you? |
| MoCo indoor mask mandate is to expire on 2/21 and will not be renewed. For those who believe that the decision re masking should be in the hands of the local health department, here’s your answer. They say no more masks. |
| Lots of schools across the country don’t mask. Surely there’s research somewhere about whether it does any good? |
My family does care and we are all fully vaccinated and have cheerfully worn our masks for nearly two years now to protect those at risk before they were protected by vaccination. But we can still ask reasonable questions about the purpose and duration of these restrictions. I am concerned that people who are vaguely concerned with the concept of transmission, unlinked to the actual severity of disease, who are unwilling to discuss any metrics that could be acceptable because of “cover ups” are essentially expecting our children to wear masks for another two years or more. That it will never be the right time and the cases will never be low “enough” and they can just insult people for suggesting otherwise. |
The CDC is too busy reformatting all the papers submitted to them to A. publish research and/or B. act on it |
Agreed! Double mask your kids, too. Outside, in your home. Alone on your front porch. In the car with you. We are fine with you passing on your inability to intelligently assess risk to your kids. Just not ours. Thanks. |