New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that post about 2 dominant GA teams defecting was really total garbage.

they were. hopefully the reasons why they stayed for another year come out. I ain't spilling the beans. but a lot of pressure came down on them, one of many things.

Spill it

There's nothing to spill... There was a troll post by an ECNL person/parent who for whatever reason is obsessed with GA

cool story. if that makes you feel better, good for you. 2 teams informed ga they were leaving. ga bent the knee to keep them in. it is what it is. we will see if they stay after next season.

More than that. Rumor is the Ga waived all their entrance fees and showcase fees for both teams.

Top Hat and LF were on their way out.
Boys would have had to go ECNL.

Not LF, they're not giving up MLSN for ECNL. Maybe Top Hat, but that's said every year

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that post about 2 dominant GA teams defecting was really total garbage.

they were. hopefully the reasons why they stayed for another year come out. I ain't spilling the beans. but a lot of pressure came down on them, one of many things.

Spill it

There's nothing to spill... There was a troll post by an ECNL person/parent who for whatever reason is obsessed with GA

cool story. if that makes you feel better, good for you. 2 teams informed ga they were leaving. ga bent the knee to keep them in. it is what it is. we will see if they stay after next season.

More than that. Rumor is the Ga waived all their entrance fees and showcase fees for both teams.

Top Hat and LF were on their way out.
Boys would have had to go ECNL.

tophat boys already in the ECNL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that post about 2 dominant GA teams defecting was really total garbage.

they were. hopefully the reasons why they stayed for another year come out. I ain't spilling the beans. but a lot of pressure came down on them, one of many things.

Spill it

There's nothing to spill... There was a troll post by an ECNL person/parent who for whatever reason is obsessed with GA

cool story. if that makes you feel better, good for you. 2 teams informed ga they were leaving. ga bent the knee to keep them in. it is what it is. we will see if they stay after next season.

More than that. Rumor is the Ga waived all their entrance fees and showcase fees for both teams.

Top Hat and LF were on their way out.
Boys would have had to go ECNL.

Not LF, they're not giving up MLSN for ECNL. Maybe Top Hat, but that's said every year

and this is why you don't know what you are talking about. LF would not have had to give up MLSN to move the girls to ECNL. but go on. tophat boys are already in the ECNL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that post about 2 dominant GA teams defecting was really total garbage.

they were. hopefully the reasons why they stayed for another year come out. I ain't spilling the beans. but a lot of pressure came down on them, one of many things.

Spill it

There's nothing to spill... There was a troll post by an ECNL person/parent who for whatever reason is obsessed with GA

cool story. if that makes you feel better, good for you. 2 teams informed ga they were leaving. ga bent the knee to keep them in. it is what it is. we will see if they stay after next season.

More than that. Rumor is the Ga waived all their entrance fees and showcase fees for both teams.

Top Hat and LF were on their way out.
Boys would have had to go ECNL.

Not LF, they're not giving up MLSN for ECNL. Maybe Top Hat, but that's said every year

and this is why you don't know what you are talking about. LF would not have had to give up MLSN to move the girls to ECNL. but go on. tophat boys are already in the ECNL

Maybe they would if MLSN told them that if you leave GA, you'll have to take your Boys with you. Maybe they were willing to do to them what ECNL has done to clubs for years to prevent them from leaving for MLSN.

and yes everyone already knows that Top Hat Boys are in ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that post about 2 dominant GA teams defecting was really total garbage.

they were. hopefully the reasons why they stayed for another year come out. I ain't spilling the beans. but a lot of pressure came down on them, one of many things.

Spill it

There's nothing to spill... There was a troll post by an ECNL person/parent who for whatever reason is obsessed with GA

cool story. if that makes you feel better, good for you. 2 teams informed ga they were leaving. ga bent the knee to keep them in. it is what it is. we will see if they stay after next season.

More than that. Rumor is the Ga waived all their entrance fees and showcase fees for both teams.

Top Hat and LF were on their way out.
Boys would have had to go ECNL.

Not LF, they're not giving up MLSN for ECNL. Maybe Top Hat, but that's said every year

and this is why you don't know what you are talking about. LF would not have had to give up MLSN to move the girls to ECNL. but go on. tophat boys are already in the ECNL

Maybe they would if MLSN told them that if you leave GA, you'll have to take your Boys with you. Maybe they were willing to do to them what ECNL has done to clubs for years to prevent them from leaving for MLSN.

and yes everyone already knows that Top Hat Boys are in ECNL.

Why would MLSN care? Better precedent for them would be breaking ECNL’s commitment to requiring both sides.

[Anonymous]

I’d always heard it was ECNL that had the stance that if you wanted in the pyramid for girls, you couldn’t have boys in MLSNext. Are there any cases where MLSNext has threatened to drop a club for leaving GA?

[Anonymous]

TH not paying fees to the GA for 2 years. That’s the rumor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d always heard it was ECNL that had the stance that if you wanted in the pyramid for girls, you couldn’t have boys in MLSNext. Are there any cases where MLSNext has threatened to drop a club for leaving GA?

Do you mean MLSN telling a club to drop RL/ECNL for GA? I’ve never heard of that but MLSN/GA “partnership” really doesn’t mean as much as people think. ECNL own its product outright which is why they throw their weight around as far as making clubs fall in line or risk getting kicked out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that post about 2 dominant GA teams defecting was really total garbage.

they were. hopefully the reasons why they stayed for another year come out. I ain't spilling the beans. but a lot of pressure came down on them, one of many things.

Spill it

There's nothing to spill... There was a troll post by an ECNL person/parent who for whatever reason is obsessed with GA

cool story. if that makes you feel better, good for you. 2 teams informed ga they were leaving. ga bent the knee to keep them in. it is what it is. we will see if they stay after next season.

More than that. Rumor is the Ga waived all their entrance fees and showcase fees for both teams.

Top Hat and LF were on their way out.
Boys would have had to go ECNL.

Not LF, they're not giving up MLSN for ECNL. Maybe Top Hat, but that's said every year

and this is why you don't know what you are talking about. LF would not have had to give up MLSN to move the girls to ECNL. but go on. tophat boys are already in the ECNL

Maybe they would if MLSN told them that if you leave GA, you'll have to take your Boys with you. Maybe they were willing to do to them what ECNL has done to clubs for years to prevent them from leaving for MLSN.

and yes everyone already knows that Top Hat Boys are in ECNL.

your assumption that MLSN and GA are synced liked that is the biggest disinformation campaign since their announced partnership. it ain't that deep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So that post about 2 dominant GA teams defecting was really total garbage.

they were. hopefully the reasons why they stayed for another year come out. I ain't spilling the beans. but a lot of pressure came down on them, one of many things.

Spill it

There's nothing to spill... There was a troll post by an ECNL person/parent who for whatever reason is obsessed with GA

cool story. if that makes you feel better, good for you. 2 teams informed ga they were leaving. ga bent the knee to keep them in. it is what it is. we will see if they stay after next season.

More than that. Rumor is the Ga waived all their entrance fees and showcase fees for both teams.

Top Hat and LF were on their way out.
Boys would have had to go ECNL.

Not LF, they're not giving up MLSN for ECNL. Maybe Top Hat, but that's said every year

and this is why you don't know what you are talking about. LF would not have had to give up MLSN to move the girls to ECNL. but go on. tophat boys are already in the ECNL

Maybe they would if MLSN told them that if you leave GA, you'll have to take your Boys with you. Maybe they were willing to do to them what ECNL has done to clubs for years to prevent them from leaving for MLSN.

and yes everyone already knows that Top Hat Boys are in ECNL.

Why would MLSN care? Better precedent for them would be breaking ECNL’s commitment to requiring both sides.

they don't. people have this false assumption that GA and MLSN are now joined at the hip as 1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d always heard it was ECNL that had the stance that if you wanted in the pyramid for girls, you couldn’t have boys in MLSNext. Are there any cases where MLSNext has threatened to drop a club for leaving GA?

Do you mean MLSN telling a club to drop RL/ECNL for GA? I’ve never heard of that but MLSN/GA “partnership” really doesn’t mean as much as people think. ECNL own its product outright which is why they throw their weight around as far as making clubs fall in line or risk getting kicked out.

Exactly. People act like it works both ways but that is just ECNL blackmailing clubs into pulling away from MLSNext if they want their girls in. MLSNext really does not care what a club does on the girls side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:TH not paying fees to the GA for 2 years. That’s the rumor.

As a parent of a GA kid, this may be the most disgusting thing I have heard. So the club was going to switch to what it believed was a better league for its girls and decided to pull the plug on it for what, 100k ish over two years? Any realistic GA parent will tell you ECNL is the better platform in this particular moment, it may change down the road but for now if you have a kid that wants to play college ECNL is a better, but not the only path.

It is absolutely disgusting, TH essentially sold out the girls for some money. TH should be called Top Hos and GA should be called the Prostitute Academy.

[Anonymous]

I’m sure GA would appreciate the help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d always heard it was ECNL that had the stance that if you wanted in the pyramid for girls, you couldn’t have boys in MLSNext. Are there any cases where MLSNext has threatened to drop a club for leaving GA?

Do you mean MLSN telling a club to drop RL/ECNL for GA? I’ve never heard of that but MLSN/GA “partnership” really doesn’t mean as much as people think. ECNL own its product outright which is why they throw their weight around as far as making clubs fall in line or risk getting kicked out.

Exactly. People act like it works both ways but that is just ECNL blackmailing clubs into pulling away from MLSNext if they want their girls in. MLSNext really does not care what a club does on the girls side.

That’s because MLSN is a boys only platform. ECNL is for boys and girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TH not paying fees to the GA for 2 years. That’s the rumor.

As a parent of a GA kid, this may be the most disgusting thing I have heard. So the club was going to switch to what it believed was a better league for its girls and decided to pull the plug on it for what, 100k ish over two years? Any realistic GA parent will tell you ECNL is the better platform in this particular moment, it may change down the road but for now if you have a kid that wants to play college ECNL is a better, but not the only path.

It is absolutely disgusting, TH essentially sold out the girls for some money. TH should be called Top Hos and GA should be called the Prostitute Academy.

You need to stop taking things personal and realize this is all just a business. TH is doing well in the GA and now they potentially are not paying fees to governing body for both teams. That’s a great business deal which if true makes perfect sense to stay in GA.

Going GA to ECNL is about what allows clubs to make the most money. This is why a lot of GA clubs stay GA so their boys can play MLSN because that’s what makes the club money.