Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So that post about 2 dominant GA teams defecting was really total garbage. [/quote] they were. hopefully the reasons why they stayed for another year come out. I ain't spilling the beans. but a lot of pressure came down on them, one of many things. [/quote] Spill it[/quote] There's nothing to spill... There was a troll post by an ECNL person/parent who for whatever reason is obsessed with GA [/quote] cool story. if that makes you feel better, good for you. 2 teams informed ga they were leaving. ga bent the knee to keep them in. it is what it is. we will see if they stay after next season. [/quote] More than that. Rumor is the Ga waived all their entrance fees and showcase fees for both teams. Top Hat and LF were on their way out. Boys would have had to go ECNL.[/quote] Not LF, they're not giving up MLSN for ECNL. Maybe Top Hat, but that's said every year [/quote] and this is why you don't know what you are talking about. LF would not have had to give up MLSN to move the girls to ECNL. but go on. tophat boys are already in the ECNL[/quote] Maybe they would if MLSN told them that if you leave GA, you'll have to take your Boys with you. Maybe they were willing to do to them what ECNL has done to clubs for years to prevent them from leaving for MLSN. and yes everyone already knows that Top Hat Boys are in ECNL. [/quote] Why would MLSN care? Better precedent for them would be breaking ECNL’s commitment to requiring both sides.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics