Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff will lock this in a second. It's clear now that this was a hit on a cis white R man by the trans left community.

The shooter was not trans. He was a cis White man. These are known facts that have been publicized all day. Is there any reason that you are struggling with them?

Splitting hairs as a defense? He was gay. He was having sex with a bio male. End of. This wasn't the right. The left is being unemployed and canceled for the celebration.

Are you so far backed into a corner where you deny that?

In your world, there aren't gay republicans? Have you heard of the Log cabin republicans? I mean, this is a serious question.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff will lock this in a second. It's clear now that this was a hit on a cis white R man by the trans left community.

The shooter was not trans. He was a cis White man. These are known facts that have been publicized all day. Is there any reason that you are struggling with them?

+1

[Anonymous]

Charlie Kirk went from making $27,000 in 2016 to over $400,000 in 2021. He had an estimated net worth of $12
million at the time of his death.
He also accumulated a real estate portfolio worth millions. All done through his inflammatory speeches and propaganda. If Kirk's life represented anything it's the notion that racism and bigotry sells.

Con man nothing more but a maga church guy conning his parishioners

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff will lock this in a second. It's clear now that this was a hit on a cis white R man by the trans left community.

The shooter was not trans. He was a cis White man. These are known facts that have been publicized all day. Is there any reason that you are struggling with them?

+1

Publicized by who? He had a trans partner. Does that make him CIS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff will lock this in a second. It's clear now that this was a hit on a cis white R man by the trans left community.

The shooter was not trans. He was a cis White man. These are known facts that have been publicized all day. Is there any reason that you are struggling with them?

Splitting hairs as a defense? He was gay. He was having sex with a bio male. End of. This wasn't the right. The left is being unemployed and canceled for the celebration.

Are you so far backed into a corner where you deny that?

In your world, there aren't gay republicans? Have you heard of the Log cabin republicans? I mean, this is a serious question.

Seriously. If you eliminated all of the powerful out or closeted gay Republicans or MAGA politicians / politicos, you'd be getting rid of (arguably) most of them.

Linday Graham,
Andrew Sullivan
All the people in this article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/26/style/gay-men-trump-administration-republicans.html

Among many, many others.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff will lock this in a second. It's clear now that this was a hit on a cis white R man by the trans left community.

The shooter was not trans. He was a cis White man. These are known facts that have been publicized all day. Is there any reason that you are struggling with them?

+1

Publicized by who? He had a trans partner. Does that make him CIS?

Have you been living in a cave? It's all over the news. Do you know what a trans person is? It is a person whose gender does not match the sex with which they were identified at birth. The shooter was identified at birth as a male. His gender today is male. He does not identify as anything other than male. So, yes, that makes him cis.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff will lock this in a second. It's clear now that this was a hit on a cis white R man by the trans left community.

The shooter was not trans. He was a cis White man. These are known facts that have been publicized all day. Is there any reason that you are struggling with them?

Being cis and White doesn't make you a Republican.

[Anonymous]

How many loops will you go through to sidestep that Kirk was killed by a left wing gay dude? Do you plan on keeping up this comical defense when speking with your colleagues? Family?

Do you think you will keep your job. I'm 100% sincere in theese questions. You are just bald face lying at this point.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff will lock this in a second. It's clear now that this was a hit on a cis white R man by the trans left community.

The shooter was not trans. He was a cis White man. These are known facts that have been publicized all day. Is there any reason that you are struggling with them?

Being cis and White doesn't make you a Republican.

Nowhere did I say he was Republican. It is unlikely that he identifies with any major party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff will lock this in a second. It's clear now that this was a hit on a cis white R man by the trans left community.

The shooter was not trans. He was a cis White man. These are known facts that have been publicized all day. Is there any reason that you are struggling with them?

Being cis and White doesn't make you a Republican.

It also doesn't make you liberal or a Democrat.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:How many loops will you go through to sidestep that Kirk was killed by a left wing gay dude? Do you plan on keeping up this comical defense when speking with your colleagues? Family?

Do you think you will keep your job. I'm 100% sincere in theese questions. You are just bald face lying at this point.

If you are talking to me, I can assure you that I will keep my job. I have not told one lie. You, on the other hand, claimed that the shooter is a member of the trans community. He is not.

I am not sure that any of us can comment on his sexual orientation. He is romantically involved with someone who apparently identifies as a woman. To my knowledge, there has been no authoritative publicly-released information about his sexual orientation.

The Governor of Utah said that the shooter was influenced by left wing ideology. So, you can hang your hat on the fact that a CIS White male influenced by leftist ideology killed Kirk. Then you can continue your attempts to suppress the speech of folks like me. Does that satisfy you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How long before the shooter is found dead in his cell?

Not long. And the "roommate" will simply fade out of public view and knowledge as well.

I don't trust the story we are being sold - AT ALL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many loops will you go through to sidestep that Kirk was killed by a left wing gay dude? Do you plan on keeping up this comical defense when speking with your colleagues? Family?

Do you think you will keep your job. I'm 100% sincere in theese questions. You are just bald face lying at this point.

Proof he’s left wing? This isn’t some religious chant - you can’t keep saying it over and over again to make it true to you. Kaitlyn Jenner isn’t left wing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

Correct
Leftist and liked D.

Yes. He was in a romantic relationship with him roommate who was in the process of transitioning from male to female.

At the end of the day, I don’t care about his politics. He is a deeply evil human being.

What I care about is that Charlie’s wife is now a widow and his two children have to grow up without a father. I care that they were in attendance and saw the murder of their husband/father.

It’s been so amazing to see how much Charlie Kirk inspired the world. There have been vigils all around the world in many different countries. I know Charlie would be so humbled by this.

Make no mistake, Charlie was assassinated because he was getting through to the younger generation. His influence was huge. He is a martyr. He is gone but his name and influence will live on forever.

I don’t condone his murder, but he’s not a martyr. Merely a sad fleeting moment. His wife will try her best, as is evident in her Instagram post, sobbing on his open casket body, kissing his hands while someone records. Views for the masses. Indoctrination ensues.

EK: “They should all know this…if you thought that my husband’s mission was powerful before, you have no idea…you have no idea what you have unleashed across this entire country. In this world, you have no idea.

You have no idea of the fire you have ignited in this wife. The cries of this widow’s echo around the world like a battle cry. The movement my husband built will not die. It won’t. I refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband’s name. I will make sure of it.

So to all of the young people who feel inspired by my husband’s faith and hard work, all of you know what Charlie would want you to do…you know (hushed and smirk)

Go find your Turning Point USA chapter. Join it. Stay involved. He wants you to make a difference. The movement’s not going anywhere. It will only get stronger when you join. Sign up on TPUSA to find your chapter.

If you’re a parent, I highly recommend you come to Americafest in December (bring the kids)😳 I’ll be there. Charlie will be there (in spirit).

If you are not a church member, I highly recommend you join one…a Bible believing church (hushed smirk).

I had to stop note taking for the obvious reasons.

She made clear she will be 100x more dangerous that her late husband…

She doesn’t want the money to stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff will lock this in a second. It's clear now that this was a hit on a cis white R man by the trans left community.

The shooter was not trans. He was a cis White man. These are known facts that have been publicized all day. Is there any reason that you are struggling with them?

+1

Publicized by who? He had a trans partner. Does that make him CIS?

Can we move on from discussing his alleged sexuality?