Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. Are people saying the shooter was really a leftist and it was over trans rights? Is this accurate??

Sorry I’m just catching up

He was radicalized and wanted to kill someone he never met but didn’t like. Apparently hated him because of what he said and how he was a right wing political activist on debate tours.

Or it could have been because Charlie Kirk was too far to the left. We don't really know yet. Or, it might not have been about politics but about some online weirdo club the shooter was in. We don't quite know about the roommate. The roommate turned him in and may be his boyfriend. But, regardless, he might not have been part of the same online small group thing.

The roommate didn’t “turn him in.” His father and their pastor did. The roommate did not contact authorities, but offered up messages to authorities at some point afterward when questioned by police.

This is all false. Yes, someone turned him in yet he is not the killer. He was a friend or ally of Kirk.

[Anonymous]

Someone who was defending this long standing issue potentially involving our administration and foreign administrations realized what Tyler and Lance were, CIA agents, contacted them somehow pretending to be affiliated with Kirk or pretending to be Kirk. Planned to meet up with Tyler at Kirk’s speech, somehow Tyler ended up on the roof, maybe to meet the person up there? Not sure. But this is how he was framed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. Are people saying the shooter was really a leftist and it was over trans rights? Is this accurate??

Sorry I’m just catching up

He was radicalized and wanted to kill someone he never met but didn’t like. Apparently hated him because of what he said and how he was a right wing political activist on debate tours.

Or it could have been because Charlie Kirk was too far to the left. We don't really know yet. Or, it might not have been about politics but about some online weirdo club the shooter was in. We don't quite know about the roommate. The roommate turned him in and may be his boyfriend. But, regardless, he might not have been part of the same online small group thing.

The roommate didn’t “turn him in.” His father and their pastor did. The roommate did not contact authorities, but offered up messages to authorities at some point afterward when questioned by police.

This is all false. Yes, someone turned him in yet he is not the killer. He was a friend or ally of Kirk.

He confessed to father, father called pastor who called US Marshalls and they came to get him. Investigators contacted the roommate where he shared the messages, the roommate didn’t call them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. Are people saying the shooter was really a leftist and it was over trans rights? Is this accurate??

Sorry I’m just catching up

He was radicalized and wanted to kill someone he never met but didn’t like. Apparently hated him because of what he said and how he was a right wing political activist on debate tours.

Or it could have been because Charlie Kirk was too far to the left. We don't really know yet. Or, it might not have been about politics but about some online weirdo club the shooter was in. We don't quite know about the roommate. The roommate turned him in and may be his boyfriend. But, regardless, he might not have been part of the same online small group thing.

The roommate didn’t “turn him in.” His father and their pastor did. The roommate did not contact authorities, but offered up messages to authorities at some point afterward when questioned by police.

This is all false. Yes, someone turned him in yet he is not the killer. He was a friend or ally of Kirk.

He confessed to father, father called pastor who called US Marshalls and they came to get him. Investigators contacted the roommate where he shared the messages, the roommate didn’t call them.

The father identified Tyler in the video but may not have even been aware of what his job even really was. Tyler explained everything, the truth, but still had to turn himself in. The roommate/colleague, Lance had no idea what went down. He thought Tyler was going to exchange info with Kirk or Kirk’s assistants. Tyler could have been carrying a laptop with him.

[Anonymous]

Someone told Tyler to meet on the roof for a payment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone who was defending this long standing issue potentially involving our administration and foreign administrations realized what Tyler and Lance were, CIA agents, contacted them somehow pretending to be affiliated with Kirk or pretending to be Kirk. Planned to meet up with Tyler at Kirk’s speech, somehow Tyler ended up on the roof, maybe to meet the person up there? Not sure. But this is how he was framed.

Lay off the meth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t understand this at all. Why are they celebrating someone who probably hated them for the color of their skin?

Because they know the truth. He didn't hate anyone. He considered all of us God's children.
Sorry you have been so brainwashed with lies.

Sure, he didn't hate anyone. He just thought black women had less brain capacity than other God's children. That's not hate at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone who was defending this long standing issue potentially involving our administration and foreign administrations realized what Tyler and Lance were, CIA agents, contacted them somehow pretending to be affiliated with Kirk or pretending to be Kirk. Planned to meet up with Tyler at Kirk’s speech, somehow Tyler ended up on the roof, maybe to meet the person up there? Not sure. But this is how he was framed.

Lay off the meth.

It’s my natural brilliance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the Governor of Utah says the suspect is not cooperating, I think that means tbe suspect is not going along with the government's preconceiived storyline.

Exactly.

+1

I fear for his life. Dead men tell no tales.

Right on cue

[Anonymous]

This case won’t close until Patel, the FBI, and Utah police firmly blame liberals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the Governor of Utah says the suspect is not cooperating, I think that means tbe suspect is not going along with the government's preconceiived storyline.

Exactly.

+1

I fear for his life. Dead men tell no tales.

Right on cue

This is pretty common though for new, high profile inmates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t understand this at all. Why are they celebrating someone who probably hated them for the color of their skin?

Because they know the truth. He didn't hate anyone. He considered all of us God's children.
Sorry you have been so brainwashed with lies.

Sure, he didn't hate anyone. He just thought black women had less brain capacity than other God's children. That's not hate at all.

Candace and Charlie were good friends dummy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mass shootings and school shootings were not a thing until our politicians let the assault weapons ban expire instead of renewing it. We reap what they sowed.

In 1966 a man went to the top of an observation tower on the campus of UT Austin with a semiautomatic rifle, a bolt action rifle, a shotgun and several pistols. He shot and killed 15 people and injured 31 others.

The Wiles-Barre shootings happened in 1982. The hooter used a semiautomatic rifle to kill 13 people and wound one other.

The San Ysidro McDonald’s massacre happened in 1984. It was perpetrated with a semiautomatic rifle, shotgun and pistol. There were 22 people killed and 19 injured.

In 1990 a shooter in Jacksonville, FL killed 11 and wounded 6 with a semiautomatic rifle and a pistol.

These are just the major semiautomatic rifle mass shootings prior to the AWB. School shootings and Mass shootings were “a thing” decades before the end of the ban.

Another mass shooting with an AK-47 happened in 2000, during the AWB, in Massachusetts. A guy killed 7 people at his office.

Guns have been around for literally hundreds of years. I actually find it no coincidence that these mass shootings only began around the time they started phasing out insane asylums.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. Are people saying the shooter was really a leftist and it was over trans rights? Is this accurate??

Sorry I’m just catching up

He was radicalized and wanted to kill someone he never met but didn’t like. Apparently hated him because of what he said and how he was a right wing political activist on debate tours.

Or it could have been because Charlie Kirk was too far to the left. We don't really know yet. Or, it might not have been about politics but about some online weirdo club the shooter was in. We don't quite know about the roommate. The roommate turned him in and may be his boyfriend. But, regardless, he might not have been part of the same online small group thing.

The roommate didn’t “turn him in.” His father and their pastor did. The roommate did not contact authorities, but offered up messages to authorities at some point afterward when questioned by police.

This is all false. Yes, someone turned him in yet he is not the killer. He was a friend or ally of Kirk.

He confessed to father, father called pastor who called US Marshalls and they came to get him. Investigators contacted the roommate where he shared the messages, the roommate didn’t call them.

The father identified Tyler in the video but may not have even been aware of what his job even really was. Tyler explained everything, the truth, but still had to turn himself in. The roommate/colleague, Lance had no idea what went down. He thought Tyler was going to exchange info with Kirk or Kirk’s assistants. Tyler could have been carrying a laptop with him.

You’re so far down Crazy Lane I guess there’s no turning back.