Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Unfortunately, I think they’re succeeding in creating reasonable doubt. Let’s see how the cross goes

[Anonymous]

Yeah, I assume those stories are true. He was too careful. I wouldn't be surprised if he asked his friends to throw him the party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, that really makes zero zero chance. The chance that a nanny would come home early with the kid because they forgot something or the kid was fussy or the nanny realized it was all an insane plan to leave for the national zoo early in the morning in the middle of rush hour traffic with a cranky preschooler is very high. Or what if the little kid had been slow getting ready and they had left for the zoo yet when sexy man shows up? This is just totally unbelievable that a mom would plan this for any 7:30 morning but especially so when she was gojng to have the NEXT morning totally free of kids!

Okay I’m having the same thought after Brendan’s testimony. His timeline is so insane.

He says: the kid woke up and got in bed with Christine. He was downstairs and heard the kid running down the hall. Also during the morning he said something about being in the basement on his laptop (he was VERY busy this morning, to say the least). He’s going to work “early” at 7:00 because he has a 9:30 meeting but also lurking around McDonald’s making sure he saves like $1 in the app, eating in his car, and using the bathroom at McDonalds. Anyway, these are all things I totally do when I’m trying to get to work early with like 2 hours until an important meeting I need to prepare for.

But back to what he says about Christine. She was still in bed with the kid, he said maybe on her phone or the kid and her are sleeping, I don’t 100% remember that point just that he said the kid is sleepy when he picked her up and Christine was on the phone when they talked and she wished him luck on his meeting. But here we are with less than one hour to go and she’s chilling in bed with the kid. Not waking her up. Not bringing her down to Brendan or Juliana, but Brendan goes and gets the kid. Then they get her ready and (poorly) pack for the day in this tight timeline with no input from Christine at all?

Not sure any of this is the best evidence in the case, but it definitely does not add up.

I should probably know after the excruciating defense presentation, but does anyone know for sure if those last telegram messages on the 24th come from the phone or laptop?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, that really makes zero zero chance. The chance that a nanny would come home early with the kid because they forgot something or the kid was fussy or the nanny realized it was all an insane plan to leave for the national zoo early in the morning in the middle of rush hour traffic with a cranky preschooler is very high. Or what if the little kid had been slow getting ready and they had left for the zoo yet when sexy man shows up? This is just totally unbelievable that a mom would plan this for any 7:30 morning but especially so when she was gojng to have the NEXT morning totally free of kids!

Okay I’m having the same thought after Brendan’s testimony. His timeline is so insane.

He says: the kid woke up and got in bed with Christine. He was downstairs and heard the kid running down the hall. Also during the morning he said something about being in the basement on his laptop (he was VERY busy this morning, to say the least). He’s going to work “early” at 7:00 because he has a 9:30 meeting but also lurking around McDonald’s making sure he saves like $1 in the app, eating in his car, and using the bathroom at McDonalds. Anyway, these are all things I totally do when I’m trying to get to work early with like 2 hours until an important meeting I need to prepare for.

But back to what he says about Christine. She was still in bed with the kid, he said maybe on her phone or the kid and her are sleeping, I don’t 100% remember that point just that he said the kid is sleepy when he picked her up and Christine was on the phone when they talked and she wished him luck on his meeting. But here we are with less than one hour to go and she’s chilling in bed with the kid. Not waking her up. Not bringing her down to Brendan or Juliana, but Brendan goes and gets the kid. Then they get her ready and (poorly) pack for the day in this tight timeline with no input from Christine at all?

Not sure any of this is the best evidence in the case, but it definitely does not add up.

I should probably know after the excruciating defense presentation, but does anyone know for sure if those last telegram messages on the 24th come from the phone or laptop?

He just said that she “seemed awake” that morning at 6:30 before he went to the shower and then the next question he like had a whole entire conversation with her and she was sitting up and wishing him good luck on his day. What a lying POS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else find it weird that he said his friends in NY were throwing him a birthday party and he was going to drive to NY the night of the killings with his daughter? 1- thats not a short drive 2- this wasn't a milestone birthday and 3- why wouldn't they have held a party for him when his wife (who they've all known since they were 18) could also go?

Yes! Also 4- he had his daughter with him. So a kid friendly 38th birthday party thrown for you several states away from where you live? Where you leave your wife behind? Weird.

Also if CB’s family was going to be gone all weekend, do you really think she’d be getting her freak on at 7:30 AM while they’re still in town? No! She would’ve waited until they left town.

Yeah, that really makes zero zero chance. The chance that a nanny would come home early with the kid because they forgot something or the kid was fussy or the nanny realized it was all an insane plan to leave for the national zoo early in the morning in the middle of rush hour traffic with a cranky preschooler is very high. Or what if the little kid had been slow getting ready and they had left for the zoo yet when sexy man shows up? This is just totally unbelievable that a mom would plan this for any 7:30 morning but especially so when she was gojng to have the NEXT morning totally free of kids!

Speaking of the nanny coming back home...does the kid have allergies or something? I don't see returning home just because I forgot my kid's lunch. Just buy something at the zoo.

Very forced seeming aspect of the story to me, too.

I agree except that some moms are very particular about what the kid eats and what the nanny spends so I can imagine an au pair feeling more stressed about “oh the mom told me to bring this sandwich so she’ll be irritated if I buy her chicken nuggets for $15 st the zoo…”. It’s not th most unbelievable part of this story. Dragging a kid out at 7:30 to fight rush hour traffic to get to the zoo before it opens is more weird.

And remember it was in the 30s/40s that day. It was not a nice spring day!

[Anonymous]

Regarding McDonald's, I think he thinks sharing all those mundane details makes it more believable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, I think they’re succeeding in creating reasonable doubt. Let’s see how the cross goes

Keep dreaming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Regarding McDonald's, I think he thinks sharing all those mundane details makes it more believable.

The more details the bigger the lie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Regarding McDonald's, I think he thinks sharing all those mundane details makes it more believable.

Do people at that income level really eat at McDonalds? And even regularly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:what was the point of BB's story about going to NY for bday party the night of the murders? Why would he kill his wife if he had such a great shindig to go to?

There has to be truth to this because he can't bo so stupid as to make up this story.

Same with IRS meeting. Too easy to disapprove. But we will see.

I think he would want some kind of, not exactly an alibi but some sort of sense that he had been making normal plans (without the au pair) after the murders. Not sure if he initiated it or they did, but either way. He wouldn’t want to look like he was evasively clearing his schedule for that day and the days after, and planning to hunker down with Juliana.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regarding McDonald's, I think he thinks sharing all those mundane details makes it more believable.

Do people at that income level really eat at McDonalds? And even regularly?

Have you been to McDonalds lately? It like $10-12 a meal, Only time I go there is when I am lazy I rather eat Chinese food.

[Anonymous]

OK, but seems not to be a great point.

The best point of the day someone made is that there is ZERO chance CB would have have this fetish encounter at 730 am and risk her young daughter coming home (sick, fussy or whatever), not have her phone on her in case the daughter was coming home early, AND do it the day before she was about to be alone for a couple days.

Per the texts with Joe, this was going to be quite the thing, there is NO way she would risk someone coming home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regarding McDonald's, I think he thinks sharing all those mundane details makes it more believable.

Do people at that income level really eat at McDonalds? And even regularly?

Please don’t be stupid

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regarding McDonald's, I think he thinks sharing all those mundane details makes it more believable.

The more details the bigger the lie

I find it interesting that he waited for the app to work. The app is slows at times, but If I have something to do later on the day like go to work I would just be F **. Then he said he also had a $8 cookie...

[Anonymous]

When he went to McDonald’s and used the app, he didn’t get a Happy Meal for his four-year-old daughter, something that would have absolutely made her day.