Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 4

[Anonymous]

He knows something. I don't know if its about something the Sussexs will announce or the Windsors (could be Yorks, Cambridges, or Wales). We'll see.

[Anonymous]

It's been 8 months since Meghan Markle won her lawsuit against the DailyFail too. They are required to itemize every dime they made off her over a two year period and give her the majority of proceeds. I hope we find out exactly how many millions that is soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow Rota admitting they were wrong. Shocking. Seriously.

Wow, what an about face. Although the damage is already done; they've spent the last 4 years enflaming their audience against Meghan, and from the looks of it, they aren't taking kindly to his tweet.

[Anonymous]

And now the crazed Meghan haters are comparing them to Hitler because - surprise! - he was Time's Person of the Year once upon a time. Truly erratic behavior from that camp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And now the crazed Meghan haters are comparing them to Hitler because - surprise! - he was Time's Person of the Year once upon a time. Truly erratic behavior from that camp.

Unlucky for them, and I've said this all along, their frenzied hate influences no one out of that increasingly isolated island. Good luck to Britain - you'll need it. Glad the sussexs are out of there. You can't blame them for your mess (and you know they would).

[Anonymous]

They must have paid Time magazine handsomely for that mention! I’m surprised to see them when there are other more worthy people to mention in this world. They don’t influence me or anyone else around us at all. They are just a nuisance. And have yet to apologize for their appalling behavior, lies, and narcissistic attitude. All they are doing is milking the system for $$$ and for fame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And now the crazed Meghan haters are comparing them to Hitler because - surprise! - he was Time's Person of the Year once upon a time. Truly erratic behavior from that camp.

What are you babbling about. Literally no one on this thread he said that. The only crazed people on here I see are the slavishly obsessed fangirls who run here to post every. Little. Whiff. Of news about these two. Looking at you crazy picture and re-tweet screenshot poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now the crazed Meghan haters are comparing them to Hitler because - surprise! - he was Time's Person of the Year once upon a time. Truly erratic behavior from that camp.

What are you babbling about. Literally no one on this thread he said that. The only crazed people on here I see are the slavishly obsessed fangirls who run here to post every. Little. Whiff. Of news about these two. Looking at you crazy picture and re-tweet screenshot poster.

They’re clearly talking about on social media. Just like that crazy person who posts anything Murky says.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now the crazed Meghan haters are comparing them to Hitler because - surprise! - he was Time's Person of the Year once upon a time. Truly erratic behavior from that camp.

What are you babbling about. Literally no one on this thread he said that. The only crazed people on here I see are the slavishly obsessed fangirls who run here to post every. Little. Whiff. Of news about these two. Looking at you crazy picture and re-tweet screenshot poster.

DP. I think PP was referring to the Twitter responses to FitzWilliams' tweet, not this DCUM thread.

[Anonymous]

She seems to have gained a lot of weight in her legs and waist. I struggle with weight myself so I am not taking it against her in any way but it’s hard not to notice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is such a horrible, unflattering picture. How do you make this slender woman look so boxy and disproportionate? Her pants take up the entire cover. You can't avoid them. Yikes.

It looks like the pants are actually quite large. I thought it was one photo but if you look at all the photos you see that she is not that slender at the moment. Totally understandable but it’s difficult to understand what’s going on with the “pants taking up half the screen” if you don’t acknowledge the underlying reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is such a horrible, unflattering picture. How do you make this slender woman look so boxy and disproportionate? Her pants take up the entire cover. You can't avoid them. Yikes.

It looks like the pants are actually quite large. I thought it was one photo but if you look at all the photos you see that she is not that slender at the moment. Totally understandable but it’s difficult to understand what’s going on with the “pants taking up half the screen” if you don’t acknowledge the underlying reality.

The pleats are not doing her any favors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She seems to have gained a lot of weight in her legs and waist. I struggle with weight myself so I am not taking it against her in any way but it’s hard not to notice.

She JUST had a baby!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They must have paid Time magazine handsomely for that mention! I’m surprised to see them when there are other more worthy people to mention in this world. They don’t influence me or anyone else around us at all. They are just a nuisance. And have yet to apologize for their appalling behavior, lies, and narcissistic attitude. All they are doing is milking the system for $$$ and for fame.

Yet your personal, repugnant opinions really don’t influence very much at all. Eh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She seems to have gained a lot of weight in her legs and waist. I struggle with weight myself so I am not taking it against her in any way but it’s hard not to notice.

She JUST had a baby!

it was 3 months ago. I am not fatshaming her - I am fat myself. She can weigh 250 lbs as far as I am concerned. I am just saying - pants are looking big and weird because she gained significant weight. Like 20 pounds maybe?