Trump wanted to release immigration detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So did Trump think this was a “punishment” or not?

It’s irrelevant. The sanctuary cities seem to think it will be. Even if Trump thinks it is, show him he’s wrong.

Of course, it’s relevant.

Did Trump think it’s a punishment? Why did he think it’s a punishment?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we are to believe that this is a 36 page thread because some are mad that Trump was mean?

What is the difference between this topic and literally every other day?

The issue is that you dont want your schools and neighborhoods going to the crapper. Its okay to admit.

You are projecting, MAGA trash!!

And, phew! Finally! It took 36 pages for you to realize that we are outraged by Trump’s vindictiveness, not the immigrants. Not the brightest bunch, are you?

Riiiiight. If the idea of sending these immigrants to sanctuary cities had come from the Democrats, you’d be falling all over yourselves to show your approval. The only reason you’re outraged (as usual) is because your favorite person to hate suggested it. Get real. We see straight through your faux outrage.
-DP

Why do you think Trump wants to send them?

Because there’s no more room at the border and because Democrats have made it clear they will happily take them. Win-win. Right?

This is exactly it. The detention centers are full - and apparently dangerous, based on what we've read, correct? So it's best to process them quickly and get them settled somewhere.

California is the best option, as it's large enough to absorb more people. Add to that its liberal outlook, and it is indeed a win-win.

The "flyover states," as they're called on these threads, aren't as hospitable. Isn't that the thinking? That's Trump country, right? So why would they be sent there? Granted there's probably more space for them there, but since they're not as "urban" as the coasts, there are not enough social programs to assist them.

But this has ALWAYS been the case. People go where there are jobs, a strong tax base, and social welfare programs.

Do you know anything about immigrants? The Midwest is where many find jobs. I bet the farmers are getting buses ready for a pick up.

illegally
under the radar
with no benefits

This is what happened with the Mexican Revolution. slave labor

So those jobs are there, but they're not "friendly." The coastal cities will provide them with schooling, healthcare, and housing.

Which is it? Do you want free slave labor or would you prefer for them to enter areas that are welcoming?

The Rs want immigrants in the MidWest for cheap labor.
The Ds want immigrants in sanctuary cities to protect them.

And that is why we don’t have stricter border security.

This thread is about illegals.

We are discussing immigrants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
When my oldest (who is turning 30 this month) entered MoCo public schools in the 90's, their national ranking was in the top 10%. When my youngest graduate high school next year, the ranking will be substantially lower. Want to know why?



Wrong thread, Gramps.


Its exactly the right thread as an explanation for why no one wants these people dumped in their towns.

Don't worry about your youngest. There are AAP programs, AP courses, IB programs, etc. Your precious child is getting just as good of an education as was available in the 90's. Maybe even better. Yes, the rankings are not as high, but that does not affect your sweet child. The rankings are bunk because second language learning does not mean low IQ. It means the kid needs to learn English before he/she can take the tests, but the federal and state mandates for testing make them take the tests before they can understand them. The rankings mean nothing. Nada.

I am totally fine with the blue areas getting the benefits of immigrants. The benefits far outweigh. The public schools did a great job with immigrants years back (1920's had a huge wave) and we continue to do well educating them today. They work hard and will continue to bring incredible benefits to our economy. Look at who is building our homes, paving our roads, driving our trucks, cooking in our restaurants, cleaning our offices, picking our produce, and on and on. And Trump is not going to bus illegals to blue areas. If they are illegal, they will be sent back at the border (as happens every day). The people being sent may be asking for asylum. Those people are not "illegal". They are allowed to stay here pending their court dates. The fact that he doesn't put more judges on the border is interesting. I can only surmise that these people benefit us (which they do).

I'm fine with more coming to my blue area. We are very good at dealing with immigrants. The red areas freak out I guess. I don't understand the people who say the blue areas don't want them. I work with them every single day and live next to them. No big deal.

[Anonymous]

Trump has succeeded in getting liberals to admit that illegal immigration is harming American citizens in sanctuary cities.


Cher
?
Verified account

@cher
Follow Follow @cher
More
I Understand Helping struggling Immigrants,but MY CITY (Los Angeles) ISNT TAKING CARE OF ITS OWN.WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+??Citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS.PPL WHO LIVE BELOW POVERTY LINE,& HUNGRY? If My State Can’t Take Care of Its Own(Many Are VETS)How Can it Take Care Of More

https://twitter.com/cher/status/1117491420934365185

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So did Trump think this was a “punishment” or not?

It’s irrelevant. The sanctuary cities seem to think it will be. Even if Trump thinks it is, show him he’s wrong.

Of course, it’s relevant.

Did Trump think it’s a punishment? Why did he think it’s a punishment?

Why does it matter if he thinks it’s a punishment? What do YOU think? Do you think it’s a punishment?

He can think the sky is green, doesn’t change what I think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump has succeeded in getting liberals to admit that illegal immigration is harming American citizens in sanctuary cities.


Cher
?
Verified account

@cher
Follow Follow @cher
More
I Understand Helping struggling Immigrants,but MY CITY (Los Angeles) ISNT TAKING CARE OF ITS OWN.WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+??Citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS.PPL WHO LIVE BELOW POVERTY LINE,& HUNGRY? If My State Can’t Take Care of Its Own(Many Are VETS)How Can it Take Care Of More

https://twitter.com/cher/status/1117491420934365185

This is gold. You need to go read the replies. Trump is making liberals see and admit the truth. Americans first!

[Anonymous]

Trump has succeeded in getting liberals to admit that illegal immigration is harming American citizens in sanctuary cities.


Cher
?
Verified account

@cher
Follow Follow @cher
More
I Understand Helping struggling Immigrants,but MY CITY (Los Angeles) ISNT TAKING CARE OF ITS OWN.WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+??Citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS.PPL WHO LIVE BELOW POVERTY LINE,& HUNGRY? If My State Can’t Take Care of Its Own(Many Are VETS)How Can it Take Care Of More

https://twitter.com/cher/status/1117491420934365185

The people on the streets begging are NOT the immigrants. The immigrants are the ones working and contributing. Yes, the people on the streets are a problem. But will they go out and work like the immigrants? Somebody has to work. We are not getting our garbage picked up and cleaning done because they cannot find employees. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Cher is 72. Maybe she has Alzheimer's or she has started watching FOX TV?

[Anonymous]

Trump turned NIMBY Libs into MAGA footsoldiers merely by suggesting making sanctuary cities into sanctuaries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So did Trump think this was a “punishment” or not?

What if he does? Your point?

[Anonymous]

Trump turned NIMBY Libs into MAGA footsoldiers merely by suggesting making sanctuary cities into sanctuaries.

Most Libs think much of what Trump says is meaningless actually. I think it would take a lot more than this to turn them into MAGA anything. You have a lot of wishful thinking.

[Anonymous]

Trump turned NIMBY Libs into MAGA footsoldiers merely by suggesting making sanctuary cities into sanctuaries.


Most Libs think much of what Trump says is meaningless actually. I think it would take a lot more than this to turn them into MAGA anything. You have a lot of wishful thinking.
[Report Post]

Cher does not speak for liberals as far as I know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[q



The Rs want immigrants in the MidWest for cheap labor.
The Ds want immigrants in sanctuary cities to protect them.

And that is why we don’t have stricter border security.

How wonderful: Republican President wants exactly the same as Democrats! Let it be!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So did Trump think this was a “punishment” or not?

It’s irrelevant. The sanctuary cities seem to think it will be. Even if Trump thinks it is, show him he’s wrong.

Of course, it’s relevant.

Did Trump think it’s a punishment? Why did he think it’s a punishment?

Why does it matter if he thinks it’s a punishment? What do YOU think? Do you think it’s a punishment?

He can think the sky is green, doesn’t change what I think.

I know what I think and I’ve shared multiple times.

Trump is unfortunately the POTUS so his opinion matters. Right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[q



The Rs want immigrants in the MidWest for cheap labor.
The Ds want immigrants in sanctuary cities to protect them.

And that is why we don’t have stricter border security.

How wonderful: Republican President wants exactly the same as Democrats! Let it be!

Sounds good. -D