Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Decades old recollections of this type of issue can vary greatly.

I tend to believe she and Kavanaugh both think they are telling the truth.

The only other witness supports kavanaugh’s version.

Without being disrespectful - at least not intentionally to the alleged victim, it’s hard to do anything with this scenario other than to ignore it.

And yet, here you are...

Here I am what? Sorry, the weight of the evidence supports him. I grant her the credit hat I think she is sincere- what more can you give her in these circumstances? There are no other allegations against the guy. A hard core rapist would have a bunch of victims. What else can you do with this?

+100
Thank you for your sanity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 52 year old man who chose to deny the event ever happened. For that lie, he should be held accountable.

You clearly believe the accuser. I do not.

Of course you don’t. Women are never to be believed by GOPers.

False , I believe kellyanne and Sarah Huckabe Sanders. I believed Paula Jones and still believe Juanita Broadderick. You?

Are we only allowed to believe women who accuse Democrats or blindly defend Trump?

It’s 100% partisan for the GOP. And I actually doubt pp when he says he believes Paula Jones and Juanita Brodderick. I think PP, like many men in the GOP, don’t believe it’s rape if the woman did anything “wrong.” Unless it was a stranger abducting a modestly dressed, church going virgin going home from her respectable job at a decent hour, they literally believe it’s the woman’s fault and it doesn’t count unless it was violent and she did everything she could fight them off to preserve her modesty.

They can pretend otherwise, but their words betray them.

I find it very curious that you're assuming the PPP is a man. You do realize most posters here are women, right? And many women disagree with you. Is that something you can wrap your mind around?

Of course not. Many women have so deeply internalized the message of misogyny and their second class citizenship that they get just giddy when they get to shame a victim. Evidently you are one of these women.

[Anonymous]

At this point, it’s still a “he said she said.” The only possible witness was a self-admitted blackout drunk who says he doesn’t remember anything. Unless other women make similar claims, I wouldn’t be surprised if the GOP still pushes him through and accepts more bloodletting at the midterms in response. They really really really want another conversative on the bench. They don’t want to wait until the dems gain seats in the Senate and force them to nominate a moderate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would be happy to see Kavanaugh’s nomination fall apart because of this so long as we charge every underage black girl caught for shoplifting as an adult, along with every black and Hispanic minor who assaults a white person.

This is easy. If people come forward with accusations that are substantiated with evidence, then I say they should be heard. I wouldn't want a thief or an assailant on the supreme court either. Republicans are so lame. You really don't have a problem with what he did, huh?

I don’t believe that what he is alleged, not proven, to have done as a minor over 35 years ago should be dredged up now as a basis to oppose his confirmation.

But, again, if you want black and Hispanic boys routinely treated as adults for all the crimes they commit as juveniles, let’s have a go at it. Personally, I always thought there was good reason to treat juveniles differently than adults, but if you want to nail Kavanaugh because of some alleged indiscretion when he was in high school I guess I can accept the electric chair for the next 16-year-old black kid who actually murders someone.

Your analogy doesn't work. He's not being prosecuted. His character is being assessed to see whether he is worthy of becoming one of the nine most important people in the entire United States. It's an exceptionally high bar. Gorsuch didn't seem to run into any trouble during his confirmation; find another one like him. Being a sexual assault denier is a bad look but you seem not to be too troubled by it. I think that says a lot about you.

DP. You know what says a lot about you? Believing the one and only accusation against someone, with zero proof. I really do hope no one ever accuses your loved ones, with no evidence whatsoever - just the power of their accusation. That would really suck for you and your entire family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her.

No way he should be confirmed.

She has nothing to gain by coming forward. Nothing. Kudos to her for being brave.

Oh please. She's lying or grossly exaggerating. Dig through her life and I'm sure you'll find that she's not to be trusted.

And people wonder why victims don’t come forward.

So we should just blindly believe her? And not try to determine whether she is credible?

Determining whether she is credible is not the same as the slandering of her that is happening in this thread.

That is laughable! And HE'S not being slandered??? Are you this dense? Apparently so.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And the next person nominated? Me too. And the next? Me too. And the next? Me too.

See the pattern here?

Keep destroying your credibility liberals.

Interesting that you assume every potential nominee has a history of sexual misconduct.

PP didn't assume that at all. PP pointed out that no matter who Trump nominates, it's a given that there will be a convenient MeToo accusation to prevent a confirmation. Which only (further) destroys liberal "credibility." Get it?

Yes, just like Gorsuch had a MeToo allegation. Oh wait, he didn't and was confirmed, with some Democratic support.

[Anonymous]

Corker and Flake have both asked for the committee vote to be postponed until more information can be gathered.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/406945-corker-says-kavanaugh-accuser-should-be-heard-out-before-committee-votes?__twitter_impression=true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man. She is very credible.

Have you ever known or been a high school girl? Here's a little secret: a story like this would have been shared contemporaneously. NOT saved for years. Had she been raped, she might not have shared, but this is the kind of story a girl would share. Hiding in the bathroom, etc.

She doesn't remember what year it was?
She doesn't remember how she left the house?

If it had happened and was that traumatic, she would have remembered.

I am her same age and had a very similar experience. I told no one at the time and I only told my husband a few years ago when we were discussing our experiences with high school parties (our oldest was starting to go out in high school).

I am her age and had the same experience and ever told anybody.

I did, too. I would never in a million years, however, decide to dredge something like this up from my high school years and expect to be taken seriously. Ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go read Judge’s book. (I did a few years ago).
What I want to know is if Kavanaugh is currently a drinker.

Maybe he is and he’s wearing poorly chosen makeup to hide the blotches. It would explain his sweaty, pallid exterior.

It doesn’t explain his perjuring mind, though.

I heard he has practically taken up residence at the Chevy Chase Lounge. A right regular bar fly.

Stop spreading (more) rumors. If you have credible links, post them. Otherwise, you really should be ashamed.

[Anonymous]

http://www.latimes.com/local/abcarian/la-me-abcarian-kavanaugh-20180916-story.html

It’s 1991 again in America. Has anything really changed?

Twenty-seven years ago, Oklahoma law professor Anita Hill reluctantly stepped into an unforgiving public spotlight to accuse U.S. Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. He was confirmed anyway.

This time, California psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford has come forward reluctantly to accuse U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault.

Her act of courage raises so many questions:

Will Republicans in the Senate do the right thing and postpone their vote on this man, who has had credibility problems throughout the entire hearing process?

Will the citizens of this country stand back and allow the Senate to confirm a man to the highest court in the land with what amounts to an accusation of attempted rape hanging over his head?

Have we learned nothing from the tribulations and aftermath of the Thomas/Hill debacle, when then-Judiciary Committee Chairman Joe Biden refused to allow three other women to corroborate Hill’s allegations under oath? (And has since apologized for his terrible judgment?)

Has the #MeToo Movement not proved that women hold onto painful secrets of sexual harassment and assault for years and years and years because they know they will be disbelieved, mocked, humiliated and/or denied work if they step forward to accuse powerful men?

And does anyone really find it hard to believe that the culture of male privilege responsible for producing the perversions of men as varied as President Trump, Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Garrison Keillor, Leslie Moonves, Al Franken, Louis CK, Bill O’Reilly, Roger Ailes, Brett Ratner, Russell Simmons — could also produce a drunken prep school senior who assaulted a 15-year-old girl at a party?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

And it goes without saying (or should) that you have no idea if this accusation is true. No one does.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And the next person nominated? Me too. And the next? Me too. And the next? Me too.

See the pattern here?

Keep destroying your credibility liberals.

Interesting that you assume every potential nominee has a history of sexual misconduct.

PP didn't assume that at all. PP pointed out that no matter who Trump nominates, it's a given that there will be a convenient MeToo accusation to prevent a confirmation. Which only (further) destroys liberal "credibility." Get it?

Yes, just like Gorsuch had a MeToo allegation. Oh wait, he didn't and was confirmed, with some Democratic support.

Gorsuch sailed through confirmation. Kavanaugh is having troubles with perjury, gambling rumors and sexual assault accusations because he's a shady, amoral creature.

[Anonymous]

For whomever was asking whether the stuff about Judge’s YouTube channel is real, here’s a screenshot from before it was deleted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man. She is very credible.

Have you ever known or been a high school girl? Here's a little secret: a story like this would have been shared contemporaneously. NOT saved for years. Had she been raped, she might not have shared, but this is the kind of story a girl would share. Hiding in the bathroom, etc.

She doesn't remember what year it was?
She doesn't remember how she left the house?

If it had happened and was that traumatic, she would have remembered.

I am her same age and had a very similar experience. I told no one at the time and I only told my husband a few years ago when we were discussing our experiences with high school parties (our oldest was starting to go out in high school).

I am her age and had the same experience and ever told anybody.

I did, too. I would never in a million years, however, decide to dredge something like this up from my high school years and expect to be taken seriously. Ever.

Really? Why?

I think nearly everyone at my all-girls Catholic HS heard about the girl who was pinned down and raped by two guys from an area Catholic school. If another woman came forward today and said those guys or any of their buddies did something similar, I imagine everyone from those two schools would believe her. Girls were constantly harassed at a local catholic school during school hours, and staff did nothing about it. Heck, there was a local priest at the school who partied with the students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Your personal level of surety really has no bearing here. What you just described is simply your uninformed opinion, which is contrary to volumes of research on this subject.

Not the PP, but you really don't see the irony in your statement, do you??