Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any of the DC crowd here tied into this Georgetown Prep school set? In the reporting, it seems like everyone knows everyone. Kind of incestuous.

Plenty of us knew Chrissy Blasey growing up. Good for her for having the courage to tell what happened.

+1

They can’t even pronounce her name correctly on the TV news - channels 5 and 7 at least.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So "traumatized" that she didn't make an accusation until 35 years later, right before he is about to be confirmed to SCOTUS. Give me a break. How dumb are we?

Most of us are smart and understand why she never said anything. You, on the other hand, are stupid.

It's not exactly "smart" to wait 35 years to report an alleged incident and hope to be taken seriously. Sounds like you're the stupid one for not acknowledging this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her.

No way he should be confirmed.

She has nothing to gain by coming forward. Nothing. Kudos to her for being brave.

Oh please. She's lying or grossly exaggerating. Dig through her life and I'm sure you'll find that she's not to be trusted.

And people wonder why victims don’t come forward.

So we should just blindly believe her? And not try to determine whether she is credible?

Determining whether she is credible is not the same as the slandering of her that is happening in this thread.

That is laughable! And HE'S not being slandered??? Are you this dense? Apparently so.
-DP

Glad you find the shaming of a sexual assault victim so funny, I guess. How is Kavanaugh being slandered? The allegations against him are credible. There are historical accounts describing them. Take a deep breath and remove your partisan goggles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her.

No way he should be confirmed.

She has nothing to gain by coming forward. Nothing. Kudos to her for being brave.

Oh please. She's lying or grossly exaggerating. Dig through her life and I'm sure you'll find that she's not to be trusted.

And people wonder why victims don’t come forward.

So we should just blindly believe her? And not try to determine whether she is credible?

Determining whether she is credible is not the same as the slandering of her that is happening in this thread.

That is laughable! And HE'S not being slandered??? Are you this dense? Apparently so.
-DP

He can bring a suit for libel, but he would have to prove that what she said is not truthful. Good luck with that. Highly doubt you’ve even read her statement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

+1M

I do not care about what he did as a minor.

+2M

He is a middle age man still unwilling to admit what he did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And the next person nominated? Me too. And the next? Me too. And the next? Me too.

See the pattern here?

Keep destroying your credibility liberals.

Interesting that you assume every potential nominee has a history of sexual misconduct.

PP didn't assume that at all. PP pointed out that no matter who Trump nominates, it's a given that there will be a convenient MeToo accusation to prevent a confirmation. Which only (further) destroys liberal "credibility." Get it?

Yes, just like Gorsuch had a MeToo allegation. Oh wait, he didn't and was confirmed, with some Democratic support.

Gorsuch sailed through confirmation. Kavanaugh is having troubles with perjury, gambling rumors and sexual assault accusations because he's a shady, amoral creature.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She feared for her life based on that? She actually thought they would kill her at a high school party with lots of people in attendance? She sounds a little nutty and hysterical.

She believes she endured a sexual assault. I feel for her. But I don’t believe her version of events is true.

Unlike her, I actually was raped by an acquaintance at a party. And I was scared shitless, but I never thought for a second that the guy was going to kill me. I do understand that their are situations in which one would justiably fear for their life (like if one were being raped at gun point). But in her set of facts, I don’t see how a rational person would fear for her life. She sounds a bit delusional.

So, any woman who has a different experience and reaction than yours is delusional. She reported that he had his hands over her mouth - that seems terrifiyimg to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Your personal level of surety really has no bearing here. What you just described is simply your uninformed opinion, which is contrary to volumes of research on this subject.

Not the PP, but you really don't see the irony in your statement, do you??

*I* didn’t claim that the accusation was true or false, whereas PP stated s/he “knows” it is false. Patterns in research on sexual assault suggest her account is credible. It doesn’t mean I know that it is true, the same way PP can’t “know” it is false.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Her doctors notes aren’t proof that the story is true.

God you guys are pathetic. So your take is that she went back in time and named her accuser in 2012, knowing that someday he’d be nominated to the Supreme Court by one of the foulest creatures to walk the halls of the White House?

Now tell us about the pizza place with a sex trafficking ring in the basement!

You miss the point. Entirely.

No, I don’t. You do. You think in 2012 she named Kavanaugh as the man who sexually assaulted her? Oh, Lordy. I hope his other victims come out. As his drunken friend Judge says, “he never did anything crazy.” So if Judge was present for this attempted rape and doesn’t think anyone did anything crazy, how routine was this?

"His other victims"?? You only wish. You sound completely unhinged and exhausting.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Very interesting how there is pro-Kavanaugh sock puppeting around this time whenever there is a new development. Oh look, it just happens to be early morning in Russia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go read Judge’s book. (I did a few years ago).
What I want to know is if Kavanaugh is currently a drinker.

Maybe he is and he’s wearing poorly chosen makeup to hide the blotches. It would explain his sweaty, pallid exterior.

It doesn’t explain his perjuring mind, though.

I heard he has practically taken up residence at the Chevy Chase Lounge. A right regular bar fly.

Stop spreading (more) rumors. If you have credible links, post them. Otherwise, you really should be ashamed.

I’m not pp, but if was reported in the Post. The bartender commented on knowing him. Said he was a Democrat, but politics never came up. Google it yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Her doctors notes aren’t proof that the story is true.

God you guys are pathetic. So your take is that she went back in time and named her accuser in 2012, knowing that someday he’d be nominated to the Supreme Court by one of the foulest creatures to walk the halls of the White House?

Now tell us about the pizza place with a sex trafficking ring in the basement!

You miss the point. Entirely.

No, I don’t. You do. You think in 2012 she named Kavanaugh as the man who sexually assaulted her? Oh, Lordy. I hope his other victims come out. As his drunken friend Judge says, “he never did anything crazy.” So if Judge was present for this attempted rape and doesn’t think anyone did anything crazy, how routine was this?

"His other victims"?? You only wish. You sound completely unhinged and exhausting.
-DP

DP, where there is one, there are usually more. We shall see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man. She is very credible.

Have you ever known or been a high school girl? Here's a little secret: a story like this would have been shared contemporaneously. NOT saved for years. Had she been raped, she might not have shared, but this is the kind of story a girl would share. Hiding in the bathroom, etc.

She doesn't remember what year it was?
She doesn't remember how she left the house?

If it had happened and was that traumatic, she would have remembered.

https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/1041386165809627136

It is worth pondering that if this doesn't make a difference—and good money says it won't—2 of the 9 justices of the US Supreme Court will have been credibly accused of serious sexual misconduct and confirmed anyway. That is quite a statement to the women of this county.

Two of the six male judges/

Who? Kavanaugh? Credibly accused? I think you mean accused. It’s certainly not credible.

It's credible because the accuser is credible.

The accused is also credible. But probably not to you, since he's a Republican.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting how there is pro-Kavanaugh sock puppeting around this time whenever there is a new development. Oh look, it just happens to be early morning in Russia.

They can sock puppet til the cows come home. But for the next few days, Kavanaugh's not going to get a vote because Corker and Flake won't approve it until they delve further into these accusations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does Kavanaugh really want to put his family through this?

His family has *already* been put through this. That's what happens when you make accusations. No matter which direction this goes, his entire reputation has been ruined because of one ALLEGED incident when he was in high school.