Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No surprise here. Dems are changing the language they are using based on what is polling best in battleground states.....



Rachael Bade
@rachaelmbade
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?

https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1195166773450092545


Good. The country is deeply stupid. They need to spell it out.

Exactly. I had no idea how incredibly ignorant and gullible so many people in our country are. Now we know. These people will never understand the concept of quid pro quo; they’ll just think it’s an effete way for ‘the libs’ to try to get over on them. Bribery is clearly enunciated as an impeachable offense in the Constitution. Now people need to understand that what Trump did was bribery. But it’s going to take a lot to overcome the obfuscation of the Republican Party. They depend on the ignorance of their constituents, and it rarely fails themp.


Prediction: These people you are calling “deeply stupid” will not take kindly to this effort to overturn their votes in 2016.

You completely missed the point. This is not about your ego or mine. No one is trying to ‘overturn your vote’. We are trying to open your eyes to the fact that that Donald Trump is, at best, deeply compromised and, more realistically, a traitor to our country. Even under the best scenario, he is horrifically incompetent. This is so blindingly obvious to at least half of the country that it is impossible for us not to see you as either willfully ignorant or complicit in this behavior. This is a five alarm fire and you are deliberately letting our country burn to the ground in order to salvage your ego and a cheap lying conman.


Oh please. If a horrifically incompetent president represented a problem, we would never have made it through four years of Jimmy Carter. I am guessing we will survive through November 2020, less than a year from now.

And, once again, you missed the point - deliberately. I was not a fan of Jimmy Carter, but he at least had integrity. You seem to prefer a malignant narcissistic wannabe dictator who is betraying our country to the highest bidder. And you wonder why we think you’re stupid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Enough. It was “their votes” that got us into this mess and only a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS will get us out, whether it be impeachment or the next election. Unless the Republicans cheat successfully. Again.


You know, when your side loses an election, it’s not necessarily due to cheating by the other side. Sometimes the voters prefer somebody you don’t like.

Here is some free advice for your side: stop calling average Americans ignorant, gullible, or whatever other insults you can come up with. We don’t vote for people who offer us nothing but contempt.



Look, it’s not about insults. It’s important to understand how dumb much of the public is for messaging. Trump is a con man for sure, and he understands what makes the ignorant tick. If there is any hope for the democrats to peel off another 2-3 points in the polls, they need to start messaging to the lowest common denominator. They need to keep it simple.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Enough. It was “their votes” that got us into this mess and only a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS will get us out, whether it be impeachment or the next election. Unless the Republicans cheat successfully. Again.


You know, when your side loses an election, it’s not necessarily due to cheating by the other side. Sometimes the voters prefer somebody you don’t like.

Here is some free advice for your side: stop calling average Americans ignorant, gullible, or whatever other insults you can come up with. We don’t vote for people who offer us nothing but contempt.



Look, it’s not about insults. It’s important to understand how dumb much of the public is for messaging. Trump is a con man for sure, and he understands what makes the ignorant tick. If there is any hope for the democrats to peel off another 2-3 points in the polls, they need to start messaging to the lowest common denominator. They need to keep it simple.


Yes, disparaging voters who you need to "peel off another 2-3 points", is a sure fire formula for success!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Enough. It was “their votes” that got us into this mess and only a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS will get us out, whether it be impeachment or the next election. Unless the Republicans cheat successfully. Again.


You know, when your side loses an election, it’s not necessarily due to cheating by the other side. Sometimes the voters prefer somebody you don’t like.

Here is some free advice for your side: stop calling average Americans ignorant, gullible, or whatever other insults you can come up with. We don’t vote for people who offer us nothing but contempt.



Look, it’s not about insults. It’s important to understand how dumb much of the public is for messaging. Trump is a con man for sure, and he understands what makes the ignorant tick. If there is any hope for the democrats to peel off another 2-3 points in the polls, they need to start messaging to the lowest common denominator. They need to keep it simple.


Yes, disparaging voters who you need to "peel off another 2-3 points", is a sure fire formula for success!

Buddy, I don’t “need” anyone. I’m one of the few people the tax cuts actually help. I just don’t care it’s see our democracy get flushed down the toilet. Why don’t you give patriotism a try... ya dummy!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No surprise here. Dems are changing the language they are using based on what is polling best in battleground states.....



Rachael Bade
@rachaelmbade
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?

https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1195166773450092545


Good. The country is deeply stupid. They need to spell it out.

Exactly. I had no idea how incredibly ignorant and gullible so many people in our country are. Now we know. These people will never understand the concept of quid pro quo; they’ll just think it’s an effete way for ‘the libs’ to try to get over on them. Bribery is clearly enunciated as an impeachable offense in the Constitution. Now people need to understand that what Trump did was bribery. But it’s going to take a lot to overcome the obfuscation of the Republican Party. They depend on the ignorance of their constituents, and it rarely fails themp.


Prediction: These people you are calling “deeply stupid” will not take kindly to this effort to overturn their votes in 2016.


You make the point. A constitutional guardrail - impeachement - is not "overturning their votes" but sure, go on banging that drum.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Enough. It was “their votes” that got us into this mess and only a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS will get us out, whether it be impeachment or the next election. Unless the Republicans cheat successfully. Again.


You know, when your side loses an election, it’s not necessarily due to cheating by the other side. Sometimes the voters prefer somebody you don’t like.

Here is some free advice for your side: stop calling average Americans ignorant, gullible, or whatever other insults you can come up with. We don’t vote for people who offer us nothing but contempt.


At one time, voters in another country preferred Hitler. Are you fine with that?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Enough. It was “their votes” that got us into this mess and only a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS will get us out, whether it be impeachment or the next election. Unless the Republicans cheat successfully. Again.


You know, when your side loses an election, it’s not necessarily due to cheating by the other side. Sometimes the voters prefer somebody you don’t like.

Here is some free advice for your side: stop calling average Americans ignorant, gullible, or whatever other insults you can come up with. We don’t vote for people who offer us nothing but contempt.
Everytime trump lies he is showing contempt for every citizen of this country including those who voted for him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Enough. It was “their votes” that got us into this mess and only a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS will get us out, whether it be impeachment or the next election. Unless the Republicans cheat successfully. Again.


You know, when your side loses an election, it’s not necessarily due to cheating by the other side. Sometimes the voters prefer somebody you don’t like.

Here is some free advice for your side: stop calling average Americans ignorant, gullible, or whatever other insults you can come up with. We don’t vote for people who offer us nothing but contempt.


At one time, voters in another country preferred Hitler. Are you fine with that?


Just stop the Hitler references and implied analogies. It makes you look weak.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No surprise here. Dems are changing the language they are using based on what is polling best in battleground states.....



Rachael Bade
@rachaelmbade
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?

https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1195166773450092545


Good. The country is deeply stupid. They need to spell it out.

Exactly. I had no idea how incredibly ignorant and gullible so many people in our country are. Now we know. These people will never understand the concept of quid pro quo; they’ll just think it’s an effete way for ‘the libs’ to try to get over on them. Bribery is clearly enunciated as an impeachable offense in the Constitution. Now people need to understand that what Trump did was bribery. But it’s going to take a lot to overcome the obfuscation of the Republican Party. They depend on the ignorance of their constituents, and it rarely fails themp.


Prediction: These people you are calling “deeply stupid” will not take kindly to this effort to overturn their votes in 2016.

You completely missed the point. This is not about your ego or mine. No one is trying to ‘overturn your vote’. We are trying to open your eyes to the fact that that Donald Trump is, at best, deeply compromised and, more realistically, a traitor to our country. Even under the best scenario, he is horrifically incompetent. This is so blindingly obvious to at least half of the country that it is impossible for us not to see you as either willfully ignorant or complicit in this behavior. This is a five alarm fire and you are deliberately letting our country burn to the ground in order to salvage your ego and a cheap lying conman.


Oh please. If a horrifically incompetent president represented a problem, we would never have made it through four years of Jimmy Carter. I am guessing we will survive through November 2020, less than a year from now.


Are you even kidding me? The man who’s still out there building g**da** houses for the poor at 100 years of age is “incompetent,” but his successor who had dementia for most of his tenure, and allowed the Iran Contra ish wasn’t? Yeah right!

You really are the worst among us, holding up liars and cheats as winners and denigrating a man who devoted his entire humble life to service. Some kind of morality you’ve got there. If JC we’re alive today, you’d be out in the streets spitting on him as he walked to his own crucifixion.
Anonymous
Fox News and Facebook with their propaganda, has sure done a number on this country.
Anonymous


If you look at what happened in the 2018 election and what just happened in Virginia and Kentucky (of all places), the trend is not going in Trump's favor. This is not going to suddenly turn around unless the Rs have something really damning. Trump was trying hard with the Bidens and Ukraine (total desperation to ask them to investigate), but it is backfiring bigly. I haven't heard any big bombshell from that side. Meanwhile, bombshells drop every day with Trump and the lies just keep piling up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Enough. It was “their votes” that got us into this mess and only a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS will get us out, whether it be impeachment or the next election. Unless the Republicans cheat successfully. Again.


You know, when your side loses an election, it’s not necessarily due to cheating by the other side. Sometimes the voters prefer somebody you don’t like.

Here is some free advice for your side: stop calling average Americans ignorant, gullible, or whatever other insults you can come up with. We don’t vote for people who offer us nothing but contempt.


At one time, voters in another country preferred Hitler. Are you fine with that?


Just stop the Hitler references and implied analogies. It makes you look weak.


NP: If you don't like Hitler, pick another despot. The phenomenon we're watching is a slide into authoritarianism. Trump has personalized politics so that what is paramount is him rather than the rule of law. Loyalty must be to Team Trump, not to the US. It's actually rather frightening to see how vulnerable our country is to bad faith actors who are unwilling to abide by established norms and laws (with the norms being as important as the laws).
Anonymous
Stop distracting folks! Get ready for the next episode in 30 minutes. Amb. Yovanovich will testify.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?466135-1/impeachment-hearing-ukraine-ambassador-marie-yovanovitch&live
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Fox News and Facebook with their propaganda, has sure done a number on this country.


People need to drop FB. Period.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No surprise here. Dems are changing the language they are using based on what is polling best in battleground states.....



Rachael Bade
@rachaelmbade
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?

https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1195166773450092545


Good. The country is deeply stupid. They need to spell it out.

Exactly. I had no idea how incredibly ignorant and gullible so many people in our country are. Now we know. These people will never understand the concept of quid pro quo; they’ll just think it’s an effete way for ‘the libs’ to try to get over on them. Bribery is clearly enunciated as an impeachable offense in the Constitution. Now people need to understand that what Trump did was bribery. But it’s going to take a lot to overcome the obfuscation of the Republican Party. They depend on the ignorance of their constituents, and it rarely fails themp.


Prediction: These people you are calling “deeply stupid” will not take kindly to this effort to overturn their votes in 2016.

You completely missed the point. This is not about your ego or mine. No one is trying to ‘overturn your vote’. We are trying to open your eyes to the fact that that Donald Trump is, at best, deeply compromised and, more realistically, a traitor to our country. Even under the best scenario, he is horrifically incompetent. This is so blindingly obvious to at least half of the country that it is impossible for us not to see you as either willfully ignorant or complicit in this behavior. This is a five alarm fire and you are deliberately letting our country burn to the ground in order to salvage your ego and a cheap lying conman.


Oh please. If a horrifically incompetent president represented a problem, we would never have made it through four years of Jimmy Carter. I am guessing we will survive through November 2020, less than a year from now.


Are you even kidding me? The man who’s still out there building g**da** houses for the poor at 100 years of age is “incompetent,” but his successor who had dementia for most of his tenure, and allowed the Iran Contra ish wasn’t? Yeah right!

You really are the worst among us, holding up liars and cheats as winners and denigrating a man who devoted his entire humble life to service. Some kind of morality you’ve got there. If JC we’re alive today, you’d be out in the streets spitting on him as he walked to his own crucifixion.


Carter might have been incompetent but in a very different t way. Same w Ronnie. But both had decent people surrounding g them. Bush 2 - not so much - he had Darth Vader 1 & 2 advising him.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: