new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
You will not be rewarded in heaven for your tireless efforts to smear the reputation of a good person based on vague, decades old allegations from high school, Karen. You should be ashamed, but clearly you’re incapable of feeling shame. |
Anonymous
Praise be |
Anonymous
Please stop talking if you don't know WTF you're blathering on about. Background investigations are NOT the same. Anyone in a government position will tell you that. |
Anonymous
|
Excellent piece in the WSJ today on the idiocy of these allegations:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/pin-the-asterisk-on-kavanaugh-11568673826 |
Anonymous
+1 PP keeps self owning. |
Anonymous
|
And here’s an editorial from the WSJ. Very grateful there is still one news source with journalistic integrity.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/the-assault-on-the-supreme-court-11568674522 |
Anonymous
Which pp? Kavanaugh's Becky or me, the Handmaid's Tale alluder? |
Anonymous
The Becky. Your allusions are funny and sad and on point. |
Anonymous
|
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/09/the-architect-of-the-latest-kavanaugh-smear-just-gave-a-self-damning-radio-interview/ Pogrebin then impugns the woman by saying she was so drunk that her memory can’t be trusted. She also says that “everyone” at the party was massively drunk and that their memories are therefore unreliable. Does she hear herself talking? If this is true, it means Max Stier was also drunk and his memories also can’t be trusted. (Someone should ask Pogrebin whether she was present at this party about which she knows so much.) By what journalistic standard does a reporter discount what is said by the person with the most direct and relevant experience of a matter — the woman in question at the Yale party — in favor of a drunken bystander? Moreover, if Stier saw this behavior at a party at which others were present, why is no one else backing him up? After a year of reporting, involving members of her own college class, Pogrebin has failed to locate any others to corroborate what Stier is saying. Of the woman at the party, she says, “Remember that she was incredibly drunk at that party as was everyone. And so I think we’re talking about memory here as really kind of a questionable issue. There are plenty of things that are conceivable that could happen when people are too drunk to remember them.” So the standard here is not whether something is true, it’s whether it’s “conceivable.” |
Anonymous
|
The latest kavanaugh smear is a revolting piece of partisan trash.
Wtf NYT. Seriously, WTF? https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/09/17/nolte-new-york-times-news-division-didnt-want-to-own-kavanaugh-smears/ |
Anonymous
Phew thank you - I hated to be a Pearl Girl all by myself. Pearl Girls go in pairs. (I have just finished reading the HMT sequel and am still lost in that world.) |
Anonymous
Ew. Your link reads like the rantings of a paranoid madman. Just ew. |
Anonymous
Yes, it is evident you’re lost in an entirely fictitious world. No explanation needed. |
Anonymous
Don't open Breitbert links. You risk gonorrhea or stupidity. |
Anonymous
Try WSJ. Sane, comprehensive, and scathing. “The attacks on Justice Kavanaugh are an attempt at intimidation to influence his opinions. But if Democrats fail in that, they want to portray conservative opinions of the current Court as illegitimate. Even Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota now says the Judiciary confirmation of Justice Kavanaugh was “a sham.” She knows better but so much for her self-styling as a “moderate.” https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/the-assault-on-the-supreme-court-11568674522 |