Hunter Biden indicted on nine tax charges, adding to gun charges in special counsel probe

[Anonymous]

Yes there is a physical lap top and some of it was authentic.
They used that in this case.
But most of the crap you Magats wade through on the interwebs isn’t authenticated and is just made up nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking from AP: President Joe Biden says he will accept the outcome of his son Hunter's criminal case and "respect the judicial process."

I bet he'll pardon him right after the election.

Keep moving those goalposts.

I haven't been following the trial at all until yesterday so not sure what you're talking about. It would be stupid of Biden to pardon him before the election.

Biden said on camera a few days ago that he would not pardon Hunter. Poor guy having his kid in the spotlight when he's been struggling with addiction for years. It makes it that much harder to get better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some addicts say being sentenced to prison saved their lives. Some say the support from their families enabled them and made their drug addiction worse because they never faced any consequences.

I doubt he will get any prison time.
No priors. Non violent. President's son.

You could’ve stopped after nonviolent. I’ll add clean and sober for sometime now.

But MAGA Will threaten violence so I’m sure he’ll get maximum time.

Being the president's son is an important consideration. He has SS detail.
How would that work if he were imprisoned?
And, your last comment is just nasty and totally not true.

David Weiss specifically said that after the plea deal he received death threats. That’s why it was pulled back. Sorry you don’t like it but we had January 6. We all saw before our eyes. We also saw what happened in Michigan and numerous other counts of political violence from maga. Violence is now normalized by the right. Actually strike that it’s encouraged.

Cue “ Portland” in 3, 2, 1…

That’s not what happened at all. The plea deal fell apart under basic questioning by the judge and Hunter’s attorney walked away. It ended up being a bad decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also the FBI confirmed the laptop belonged to Hunter and evidence from the laptop was used at the trial. That means the FBI confirmed the stuff on the laptop belonged to Hunter and was not tampered with.

Yes. WHEN did they do that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the FBI confirmed the laptop belonged to Hunter and evidence from the laptop was used at the trial. That means the FBI confirmed the stuff on the laptop belonged to Hunter and was not tampered with.

But the FBI is a corrupt organization and my hero Jim Jordan wants to defund it. Nothing they say has any credibility.

Sorry, Jim Jordan superfan; the FBI used the laptop as evidence. You and your Q buddies will have to accept that the FBI confirmed that the laptop belonged to Hunter and the contents are authentic. I think you should start asking this question: why did 50 high ranking intelligence officials sign their name to a letter that stated that the laptop was russian disinformation? That’s a bit dodgy.

Could you provide the transcript where the FBI states all of the contents of the laptop are authentic? TYIA.

“Prosecutors on Tuesday spent hours on Hunter Biden’s drug problem, using his own words and missives to show the depth of the addiction and to suggest it was still ongoing when he bought the gun. They showed jurors his old laptop computer, the same one he left at a Delaware repair shop and never retrieved. In 2020, the contents made their way to Republicans and were publicly leaked, revealing highly personal messages about his work and his life. He has since sued over the leaked information.

An FBI agent read aloud messages stored on his devices that chronicled a desperate effort to buy drugs. The data also included receipts for a detox facility he attended before relapsing and showed large cash withdrawals.


In one exchange with Hallie, the day after he bought the gun, she wrote: “I called you 500 times in past 24 hours.” Hunter replied less than a minute later, informing her that he was “sleeping on a car smoking crack on 4th street and Rodney.”

“There’s my truth,” he added in a follow-up text.

But during cross-examination, the FBI agent testified that Hunter Biden sent fewer messages about seeking drugs in October 2018, around the time when he purchased the gun, than in February 2019, a later period in which Lowell described his client as struggling significantly with addiction.“


https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden-trial-federal-gun-charges-jury-477c0ca9d07afc1a52bd90ef6d2167cb

The FBI using the laptop as evidence is confirmation.

I'm not seeing any testimony saying that everything on the laptop is authentic. That was your claim.

That is the truth. Ask your husband about it when he gets home from work. He can explain it to you.

If it was true, you could you just cite the testimony. The fact that you cannot makes me think it is not true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the FBI confirmed the laptop belonged to Hunter and evidence from the laptop was used at the trial. That means the FBI confirmed the stuff on the laptop belonged to Hunter and was not tampered with.

Yes. WHEN did they do that?

WHEN the FBI used the laptop to prosecute Hunter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the FBI confirmed the laptop belonged to Hunter and evidence from the laptop was used at the trial. That means the FBI confirmed the stuff on the laptop belonged to Hunter and was not tampered with.

But the FBI is a corrupt organization and my hero Jim Jordan wants to defund it. Nothing they say has any credibility.

Sorry, Jim Jordan superfan; the FBI used the laptop as evidence. You and your Q buddies will have to accept that the FBI confirmed that the laptop belonged to Hunter and the contents are authentic. I think you should start asking this question: why did 50 high ranking intelligence officials sign their name to a letter that stated that the laptop was russian disinformation? That’s a bit dodgy.

Could you provide the transcript where the FBI states all of the contents of the laptop are authentic? TYIA.

Right after you provide transcripts that show anything found on the laptop was Russian disinformation.

You clearly lack any knowledge of Russian disinformation. I have no idea whether the laptop was authentic or not, or more precisely whether everything on the laptop was authentic or not. Disinformation involves some truth, various misleading statements of various degrees, and perhaps some outright lies. The dossier on Trump was not 100% false and, as we know, was not 100% accurate either. I note that the MSM did not publish the dossier (except for one outlet) until after the election precisely because the MSM could not verify it. I note also that the Clinton campaign did not push the dossier prior to the election for the same reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the FBI confirmed the laptop belonged to Hunter and evidence from the laptop was used at the trial. That means the FBI confirmed the stuff on the laptop belonged to Hunter and was not tampered with.

But the FBI is a corrupt organization and my hero Jim Jordan wants to defund it. Nothing they say has any credibility.

Sorry, Jim Jordan superfan; the FBI used the laptop as evidence. You and your Q buddies will have to accept that the FBI confirmed that the laptop belonged to Hunter and the contents are authentic. I think you should start asking this question: why did 50 high ranking intelligence officials sign their name to a letter that stated that the laptop was russian disinformation? That’s a bit dodgy.

Could you provide the transcript where the FBI states all of the contents of the laptop are authentic? TYIA.

Right after you provide transcripts that show anything found on the laptop was Russian disinformation.

You clearly lack any knowledge of Russian disinformation. I have no idea whether the laptop was authentic or not,.

You might not but the FBI is clear that it was authentic. It was admitted as evidence!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the FBI confirmed the laptop belonged to Hunter and evidence from the laptop was used at the trial. That means the FBI confirmed the stuff on the laptop belonged to Hunter and was not tampered with.

But the FBI is a corrupt organization and my hero Jim Jordan wants to defund it. Nothing they say has any credibility.

Sorry, Jim Jordan superfan; the FBI used the laptop as evidence. You and your Q buddies will have to accept that the FBI confirmed that the laptop belonged to Hunter and the contents are authentic. I think you should start asking this question: why did 50 high ranking intelligence officials sign their name to a letter that stated that the laptop was russian disinformation? That’s a bit dodgy.

Could you provide the transcript where the FBI states all of the contents of the laptop are authentic? TYIA.

“Prosecutors on Tuesday spent hours on Hunter Biden’s drug problem, using his own words and missives to show the depth of the addiction and to suggest it was still ongoing when he bought the gun. They showed jurors his old laptop computer, the same one he left at a Delaware repair shop and never retrieved. In 2020, the contents made their way to Republicans and were publicly leaked, revealing highly personal messages about his work and his life. He has since sued over the leaked information.

An FBI agent read aloud messages stored on his devices that chronicled a desperate effort to buy drugs. The data also included receipts for a detox facility he attended before relapsing and showed large cash withdrawals.


In one exchange with Hallie, the day after he bought the gun, she wrote: “I called you 500 times in past 24 hours.” Hunter replied less than a minute later, informing her that he was “sleeping on a car smoking crack on 4th street and Rodney.”

“There’s my truth,” he added in a follow-up text.

But during cross-examination, the FBI agent testified that Hunter Biden sent fewer messages about seeking drugs in October 2018, around the time when he purchased the gun, than in February 2019, a later period in which Lowell described his client as struggling significantly with addiction.“


https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden-trial-federal-gun-charges-jury-477c0ca9d07afc1a52bd90ef6d2167cb

The FBI using the laptop as evidence is confirmation.

I'm not seeing any testimony saying that everything on the laptop is authentic. That was your claim.

That is the truth. Ask your husband about it when he gets home from work. He can explain it to you.

If it was true, you could you just cite the testimony. The fact that you cannot makes me think it is not true.

In June 2024, special counsel Weiss utilized the laptop, its contents, and an invoice from Isaac's repair shop as evidence in Biden's trial in Delaware, in which he is accused of purchasing a firearm despite knowing he was a drug user. Defense attorneys for Biden argued that they had "numerous reasons to believe the data had been altered and compromised before investigators obtained the electronic material", which Weiss described as "a conspiracy theory with no supporting evidence". Prosecutors stated that defense attorneys had not "provided any evidence or information that shows that his laptop contains false information". At the trial, the presiding judge sided with prosecutors and allowed for usage of the laptop as evidence.[91][92]

[91] The witness, FBI agent Erika Jensen, testified about the authenticity of Hunter Biden's laptop, which has been the subject of rumors and speculation online for years. Jensen said the laptop contained evidence of Hunter Biden's drug and gun purchase.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/live-blog/hunter-biden-trial-live-update-rcna155305


Special counsel plans to use infamous Hunter Biden laptop as evidence at gun trial


CNN
—
Special counsel David Weiss plans to introduce Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop as evidence against him at his upcoming trial on felony gun charges.

Weiss made his intentions clear in a court filing Wednesday that also blasted Hunter Biden’s lawyers for questioning the laptop’s authenticity, which he called a “conspiracy theory.”


“The defendant’s laptop is real (it will be introduced as a trial exhibit) and it contains significant evidence of the defendant’s guilt,” prosecutors wrote in a Wednesday filing.


“Defense counsel has numerous reasons to believe the data had been altered and compromised before investigators obtained the electronic material,” his lawyers wrote.

“He has not shown any of the actual evidence in this case is unreliable or inauthentic, because there is none,” Weiss’ team wrote in a Wednesday filing. “Instead, the defendant’s theory about the laptop is a conspiracy theory with no supporting evidence.”

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/22/politics/hunter-biden-laptop-gun-trial-special-counsel/index.html

We have a new group to contend with: The Hunter Biden Laptop Conspiracy Truthers.

T.H.B.L.C.T. for short. Nickname: The Hunters. Always hunting for the truth about the laptop!

Get some shirts made up after you design a logo. I want to know when I am in the vicinity of one or more of you, so I can observe you in public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the FBI confirmed the laptop belonged to Hunter and evidence from the laptop was used at the trial. That means the FBI confirmed the stuff on the laptop belonged to Hunter and was not tampered with.

Yes. WHEN did they do that?

WHEN the FBI used the laptop to prosecute Hunter.

Yep, when it no longer could damage the Biden's in the 2020 campaign.

And the FBI did it in 2024 ONLY under order to appear in federal court for testimony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some addicts say being sentenced to prison saved their lives. Some say the support from their families enabled them and made their drug addiction worse because they never faced any consequences.

I doubt he will get any prison time.
No priors. Non violent. President's son.

You could’ve stopped after nonviolent. I’ll add clean and sober for sometime now.

But MAGA Will threaten violence so I’m sure he’ll get maximum time.

Being the president's son is an important consideration. He has SS detail.
How would that work if he were imprisoned?
And, your last comment is just nasty and totally not true.

David Weiss specifically said that after the plea deal he received death threats. That’s why it was pulled back. Sorry you don’t like it but we had January 6. We all saw before our eyes. We also saw what happened in Michigan and numerous other counts of political violence from maga. Violence is now normalized by the right. Actually strike that it’s encouraged.

Cue “ Portland” in 3, 2, 1…

That’s not what happened at all. The plea deal fell apart under basic questioning by the judge and Hunter’s attorney walked away. It ended up being a bad decision.

Nope, the plea deal was rescinded when Trump unleashed MAGAs to threaten Weiss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the FBI confirmed the laptop belonged to Hunter and evidence from the laptop was used at the trial. That means the FBI confirmed the stuff on the laptop belonged to Hunter and was not tampered with.

But the FBI is a corrupt organization and my hero Jim Jordan wants to defund it. Nothing they say has any credibility.

Sorry, Jim Jordan superfan; the FBI used the laptop as evidence. You and your Q buddies will have to accept that the FBI confirmed that the laptop belonged to Hunter and the contents are authentic. I think you should start asking this question: why did 50 high ranking intelligence officials sign their name to a letter that stated that the laptop was russian disinformation? That’s a bit dodgy.

Could you provide the transcript where the FBI states all of the contents of the laptop are authentic? TYIA.

Right after you provide transcripts that show anything found on the laptop was Russian disinformation.

You clearly lack any knowledge of Russian disinformation. I have no idea whether the laptop was authentic or not, or more precisely whether everything on the laptop was authentic or not. Disinformation involves some truth, various misleading statements of various degrees, and perhaps some outright lies. The dossier on Trump was not 100% false and, as we know, was not 100% accurate either. I note that the MSM did not publish the dossier (except for one outlet) until after the election precisely because the MSM could not verify it. I note also that the Clinton campaign did not push the dossier prior to the election for the same reason.

“Prosecutors counter by saying that some of the people who exchanged these messages with Biden will testify and assert that the messages are real. They also say the laptop materials are only a fraction of the digital evidence they have collected against Biden, including messages subpoenaed directly from Apple.

“He has not shown any of the actual evidence in this case is unreliable or inauthentic, because there is none,” Weiss’ team wrote in a Wednesday filing. “Instead, the defendant’s theory about the laptop is a conspiracy theory with no supporting evidence.”

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/22/politics/hunter-biden-laptop-gun-trial-special-counsel/index.html

Your uneducated opinion about the laptop is meaningless. The FBI submitted it as evidence; the judge allowed it; Hunter’s attorneys could not prove any evidence of the laptop being tampered with; the FBI used it as evidence.

What some rando online thinks about it is meaningless.

[Anonymous]

Hunter Biden being convicted of a firearms charge is the ultimate red herring of red herrings.

The DOJ allowed the statute of limitations expire on his most serious tax charges, buried evidence of the Bidens' foreign bribery allegations, and attempted to give Hunter a sweetheart deal with broad immunity.

David Weiss wouldn't go after him on the serious tax charges or on FARA because all of that would lead back to the shady business dealings involving his father.

Instead, they went after him for a much lesser charge, where the evidence was way too insurmountable to ignore, so they can scream "nobody is above the law" when they put President Trump in jail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the FBI confirmed the laptop belonged to Hunter and evidence from the laptop was used at the trial. That means the FBI confirmed the stuff on the laptop belonged to Hunter and was not tampered with.

But the FBI is a corrupt organization and my hero Jim Jordan wants to defund it. Nothing they say has any credibility.

Sorry, Jim Jordan superfan; the FBI used the laptop as evidence. You and your Q buddies will have to accept that the FBI confirmed that the laptop belonged to Hunter and the contents are authentic. I think you should start asking this question: why did 50 high ranking intelligence officials sign their name to a letter that stated that the laptop was russian disinformation? That’s a bit dodgy.

Could you provide the transcript where the FBI states all of the contents of the laptop are authentic? TYIA.

Right after you provide transcripts that show anything found on the laptop was Russian disinformation.

You clearly lack any knowledge of Russian disinformation. I have no idea whether the laptop was authentic or not, or more precisely whether everything on the laptop was authentic or not. Disinformation involves some truth, various misleading statements of various degrees, and perhaps some outright lies. The dossier on Trump was not 100% false and, as we know, was not 100% accurate either. I note that the MSM did not publish the dossier (except for one outlet) until after the election precisely because the MSM could not verify it. I note also that the Clinton campaign did not push the dossier prior to the election for the same reason.

The Clinton campaign also paid 50% for the dossier and the DNC paid 50% of the cost to acquire. That comes from testimony from John Podesta.

Don't ask me to repost it. It was posted here when it was revealed and deleted by the admin. If you want to verify it, go search for it on your own.

[Anonymous]

Guess Hunter will have to suspend his campaign now.