Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?

Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.

His MAGA, gun nut parents failed him.

They did. His parents let him go to a leftist college that brainwashed him.

But the parents buying machine guns for their child’s birthday are not brainwashed? What are they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The problem is that the shooter probably had NO political motive. The media and the public are desperate to pin this on a political motive. That makes it easier for our brains to compartmentalize and explain the act. No one wants to think about the possibility that the shooter simply did it for fun or as a way to "troll" the country because they get enjoyment out of simply pouring gas on a fire.

Surprisingly enough, most mass shooters in US history do not have political motivations. They are simply disturbed men with broken psyche. This kid spent wayyyyyyy too much time on the internet and playing video games. He spent way too much time on tiktok and 4chan. Just utter brainrot from the internet.

But no one wants to admit this, because it implies our culture has gone down the tubes. It also implies it there is threat out there we can't so easily conteol be because it is politically agnostic. It could be anyone in the future that isn't so easily groupable because it wasn't politically motivated. That's a far scarier thought, because how many young Americans are out there now with brain rot due to too many video games or too many tiktok videos?

Very likely this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The problem is that the shooter probably had NO political motive. The media and the public are desperate to pin this on a political motive. That makes it easier for our brains to compartmentalize and explain the act. No one wants to think about the possibility that the shooter simply did it for fun or as a way to "troll" the country because they get enjoyment out of simply pouring gas on a fire.

Surprisingly enough, most mass shooters in US history do not have political motivations. They are simply disturbed men with broken psyche. This kid spent wayyyyyyy too much time on the internet and playing video games. He spent way too much time on tiktok and 4chan. Just utter brainrot from the internet.

But no one wants to admit this, because it implies our culture has gone down the tubes. It also implies it there is threat out there we can't so easily conteol be because it is politically agnostic. It could be anyone in the future that isn't so easily groupable because it wasn't politically motivated. That's a far scarier thought, because how many young Americans are out there now with brain rot due to too many video games or too many tiktok videos?

Re the bolded - PLENTY of people are saying this so not sure why you are saying nobody wants to admit it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if there were a leftist assassin partaking in this thread right now. I really hope the FBI is reading this after I sent them a tip.

Hopefully they can track ip addresses da to identify these crazies.

They’re going to find lots of Russian bots repeating the “declare war on the left wing.” It’s so effective to keep the right wing zombies going.

Oh, who am I kidding. The FBI is still redacting Trump’s name out of the Epstein files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

Correct
Leftist and liked D.

Yes. He was in a romantic relationship with him roommate who was in the process of transitioning from male to female.

At the end of the day, I don’t care about his politics. He is a deeply evil human being.

What I care about is that Charlie’s wife is now a widow and his two children have to grow up without a father. I care that they were in attendance and saw the murder of their husband/father.

It’s been so amazing to see how much Charlie Kirk inspired the world. There have been vigils all around the world in many different countries. I know Charlie would be so humbled by this.

Make no mistake, Charlie was assassinated because he was getting through to the younger generation. His influence was huge. He is a martyr. He is gone but his name and influence will live on forever.

His murder was wrong. Period. But he was also wrong and not a good person. No true Christian / follower of Jesus' teachings would have said all the horrible things he said.

He is not a martyr; he was just good at manipulating people on social media. In fact, using the teachings of Jesus to preach hate and divisiveness makes him even worse than horrible. Hate in the name of Jesus. That's blasphemy.

I'm sorry you are one of the suckers. Perhaps if you pray on it, you will see the light.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?

Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.

His MAGA, gun nut parents failed him.

They did. His parents let him go to a leftist college that brainwashed him.

He spent a semester or 2 at Utah State, hardly a bastion of wokeness. But ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is that the shooter probably had NO political motive. The media and the public are desperate to pin this on a political motive. That makes it easier for our brains to compartmentalize and explain the act. No one wants to think about the possibility that the shooter simply did it for fun or as a way to "troll" the country because they get enjoyment out of simply pouring gas on a fire.

Surprisingly enough, most mass shooters in US history do not have political motivations. They are simply disturbed men with broken psyche. This kid spent wayyyyyyy too much time on the internet and playing video games. He spent way too much time on tiktok and 4chan. Just utter brainrot from the internet.

But no one wants to admit this, because it implies our culture has gone down the tubes. It also implies it there is threat out there we can't so easily conteol be because it is politically agnostic. It could be anyone in the future that isn't so easily groupable because it wasn't politically motivated. That's a far scarier thought, because how many young Americans are out there now with brain rot due to too many video games or too many tiktok videos?

Re the bolded - PLENTY of people are saying this so not sure why you are saying nobody wants to admit it.

If society is going down the tubes why do we want guns freely floating around?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?

Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.

Please cite real, verifiable sources for this. There certainly is plenty of evidence the far alt-right were after him. Where are the death threats from the "left"? Exactly WHO do you mean by "the left". Where did "they" call for his death, versus vehemently disagreeing with him.

This is a huge accusation you are making. What is your specific and verifiable proof?

The groypers hated Kirk. You could say it was right wing Internet gang violence. White on white crime. So does it really count?

Exactly. The threats came from the alt-right. And Utah is so full of leftist organizations? Are you kidding me?

But MAGA will lap this stuff up. Anything to keep peddling hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?

Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.

His MAGA, gun nut parents failed him.

His parents turned him in. They saved lives, fool.

The roommate and online gamer group could have saved lives and turned him in beforehand.

But they chose not to.

Are they on suicide watch now and going to do due process?

The Utah governor whose words you take as sacrosanct said the roommate didn't know.

. Lol. Circle back on that one PP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?

Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.

Please cite real, verifiable sources for this. There certainly is plenty of evidence the far alt-right were after him. Where are the death threats from the "left"? Exactly WHO do you mean by "the left". Where did "they" call for his death, versus vehemently disagreeing with him.

This is a huge accusation you are making. What is your specific and verifiable proof?

The groypers hated Kirk. You could say it was right wing Internet gang violence. White on white crime. So does it really count?

Exactly. The threats came from the alt-right. And Utah is so full of leftist organizations? Are you kidding me?

But MAGA will lap this stuff up. Anything to keep peddling hate.

Troll

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?

Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.

Please cite real, verifiable sources for this. There certainly is plenty of evidence the far alt-right were after him. Where are the death threats from the "left"? Exactly WHO do you mean by "the left". Where did "they" call for his death, versus vehemently disagreeing with him.

This is a huge accusation you are making. What is your specific and verifiable proof?

Try and keep up, again. Every major news outlet has tons of articles about legiobn of Dems being fired for celebrating his murder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

Correct
Leftist and liked D.

Yes. He was in a romantic relationship with him roommate who was in the process of transitioning from male to female.

At the end of the day, I don’t care about his politics. He is a deeply evil human being.

What I care about is that Charlie’s wife is now a widow and his two children have to grow up without a father. I care that they were in attendance and saw the murder of their husband/father.

It’s been so amazing to see how much Charlie Kirk inspired the world. There have been vigils all around the world in many different countries. I know Charlie would be so humbled by this.

Make no mistake, Charlie was assassinated because he was getting through to the younger generation. His influence was huge. He is a martyr. He is gone but his name and influence will live on forever.

His murder was wrong. Period. But he was also wrong and not a good person. No true Christian / follower of Jesus' teachings would have said all the horrible things he said.

He is not a martyr; he was just good at manipulating people on social media. In fact, using the teachings of Jesus to preach hate and divisiveness makes him even worse than horrible. Hate in the name of Jesus. That's blasphemy.

I'm sorry you are one of the suckers. Perhaps if you pray on it, you will see the light.

That’s not what’s shown in most of the longer video clips/ unedited.

I hope someone else steps up to do in person group debates and talks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

It's what happens when MAGA raises children. See how they turn out? Trans-loving murderers.

[Anonymous]

One of multiple things he said about Taylor Swift. Weird.

https://www.tiktok.com/@thecharliekirkshow/video/7469593451479223594

[Anonymous]

The gun nuts blame everything and anything other than themselves. It’s always someone else’s fault. No one but the shooter is responsible for his actions, not the roommate, not the online radical group, although I definitely blame his parents in this case.