Melania Trump's Official Portrait as First Lady

[Anonymous]

http://www.vogue.com/article/melania-trump-white-house-portrait-released

Thoughts? She seems heavily air brushed.

[Anonymous]

I don't know why they airbrushed her so much. She's a beautiful woman. I'm no fan of her or her husband, but I can admit that she's stunning. This photo just makes her look plastic.

[Anonymous]

She is a beautiful woman, and this is a lovely photo of her. I say that as a huge Hillary supporter who has no love for DJT. But I have no reason not to like her and wish her well. I'm sure she's faced a lot of intense scrutiny and stress, and I can only wish for her peace and happiness.

Why would we pick this apart? She's beautiful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know why they airbrushed her so much. She's a beautiful woman. I'm no fan of her or her husband, but I can admit that she's stunning. This photo just makes her look plastic.

I agree that she's beautiful and don't know why they airbrushed her so much. I don't think my neck and hands looked that good when I was 20 years old, let alone now.

Although, if I was having my portrait touched up that I knew was going to be picked apart, I'd probably say, "hey...what can you do about those smile lines?"

[Anonymous]

Fitting body language choice.

[Anonymous]

I think the obvious airbrushing is sort of tacky. This reminds me of a Glamour Shot like you could get at the mall in the 80s. The fact that she feels a need to hide behind so much air brushing is odd given how attractive she is.

I think her enormous ring is tacky.

[Anonymous]

The fit of the jacket on the shoulder and her arms looks impeccable.

[Anonymous]

I'm distracted by the giant rock on her finger...

[Anonymous]

Can we just say "beautiful" and be done?

[Anonymous]

I hate pretty much everything about this portrait. Glamour shots is what it looks like. I think the background makes it worse plus the ridiculous amount of makeup. She needs to be more understated. She's a gorgeous woman without all this airbrushing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is a beautiful woman, and this is a lovely photo of her. I say that as a huge Hillary supporter who has no love for DJT. But I have no reason not to like her and wish her well. I'm sure she's faced a lot of intense scrutiny and stress, and I can only wish for her peace and happiness.

Why would we pick this apart? She's beautiful.

There's plenty of reason not to like her. Let's start with the birther stuff.

[Anonymous]

Her hand looks very weird. I get that her thumb is probably tucked somewhere, but it looks like a 4-fingered claw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a beautiful woman, and this is a lovely photo of her. I say that as a huge Hillary supporter who has no love for DJT. But I have no reason not to like her and wish her well. I'm sure she's faced a lot of intense scrutiny and stress, and I can only wish for her peace and happiness.

Why would we pick this apart? She's beautiful.

There's plenty of reason not to like her. Let's start with the birther stuff.

And the gold-digging. As if she would ever be married to the likes of DJT but for his billions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a beautiful woman, and this is a lovely photo of her. I say that as a huge Hillary supporter who has no love for DJT. But I have no reason not to like her and wish her well. I'm sure she's faced a lot of intense scrutiny and stress, and I can only wish for her peace and happiness.

Why would we pick this apart? She's beautiful.

There's plenty of reason not to like her. Let's start with the birther stuff.

And the fact that they've cut Meals on Wheels and many other programs for the poor, yet she has the insensitivity to wear that massive rock on her finger.

[Anonymous]

It's very strange the way the removed every single line and shadow on her face. Everybody has a little bit of shading under their eyes, and at 46 we know she has some age to her face. This looks extremely artificial, almost creepy.