War with Iran

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So the new objective is to Open the strait? No stop Iran from getting nukes (US killed the one guy stopping that), not regime change. No, it’s yo get back to business as usual while lifting sanctions??

When will the incompetence end??


Look at the map and see the distance from the Strait of Hormuz to Kharg Island. Then weep for our soldiers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


It really annoys me when people equate being mad the US started a war we didn't need to with being an Iranian sympathizer. I simply didn't think it was the right decision to preemptively strike the country with no imminent threat. Of course the Iranian regime is not a positive force but us meddling with them only makes us more entangled.


I was referring to the idiot who claimed Israel attacked Diego Garcia as a false flag, while we all know it was Iran and has been reported in multiple sources as being Iran. There was no false flag. THAT is an Iranian regime sympathizer.


Of course, of course! It’s not as if we’ve learned days, weeks, months, and sometimes years later that what we thought to be the case initially was dead wrong. No, no - of course! Etch it in stone that Iran was responsible.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


It really annoys me when people equate being mad the US started a war we didn't need to with being an Iranian sympathizer. I simply didn't think it was the right decision to preemptively strike the country with no imminent threat. Of course the Iranian regime is not a positive force but us meddling with them only makes us more entangled.


I was referring to the idiot who claimed Israel attacked Diego Garcia as a false flag, while we all know it was Iran and has been reported in multiple sources as being Iran. There was no false flag. THAT is an Iranian regime sympathizer.


Of course, of course! It’s not as if we’ve learned days, weeks, months, and sometimes years later that what we thought to be the case initially was dead wrong. No, no - of course! Etch it in stone that Iran was responsible.


You report back when all international sources agree it was Israel. For now, that's just wishful thinking in your crazy imagination.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


It really annoys me when people equate being mad the US started a war we didn't need to with being an Iranian sympathizer. I simply didn't think it was the right decision to preemptively strike the country with no imminent threat. Of course the Iranian regime is not a positive force but us meddling with them only makes us more entangled.


I was referring to the idiot who claimed Israel attacked Diego Garcia as a false flag, while we all know it was Iran and has been reported in multiple sources as being Iran. There was no false flag. THAT is an Iranian regime sympathizer.


Of course, of course! It’s not as if we’ve learned days, weeks, months, and sometimes years later that what we thought to be the case initially was dead wrong. No, no - of course! Etch it in stone that Iran was responsible.


You report back when all international sources agree it was Israel. For now, that's just wishful thinking in your crazy imagination.


You’ll do anything to defend your community even if it’s abroad but not America.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


Eh, everyone knows Israel MO is false flags. Long history of doing and most people can name actual incidents of Israel getting caught. Mossad agents already tried attacking gulf state oil infrastructure and were arrested.
Plus mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky confirmed this behavior in his book by Way of Deception.

It's pretty hilarious how desperate Israel is to try and get other countries including all of Europe to fight its war. Guess just leaching of the US isn't cutting it.

This article conveniently came out right after the Diego Gracia attack. Funny.


Muhanad Seloom, lecturer at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, told Al Jazeera that the reported Iranian attack “changes the calculus” of the war for the US.

“These missiles to Diego Garcia mean Iran has 4,000km-plus ballistic missiles, and that hasn’t been revealed before. All reports before that said Iran had a 2,000km [1,240-mile] range and not beyond that,” Seloom said.

“If you reverse the direction of these missiles, then they could reach London, so that changes the calculus not only for the US and its justification for the war but also for a reluctant London and European Union to join the war.”

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/22/did-iran-launch-missiles-at-us-uk-base-on-diego-garcia-heres-what-to-know


Fascinating! And who benefits the most from that convenient change in calculus?

Iran? Or Israel?

Meanwhile, we’re expected to play along and look past the fact that, what?

That we didn’t try to blame the school slaughter on Iran? That U.S. intelligence and Israeli intelligence apparently are so incompetent that neither of them had evidence of these missiles until now, when trotting such evidence out before Congress would have galvanized enough support from both sides of the aisle to avoid what is going to become massive anti-war momentum?

We’re believing that, are we now?

TFOH …
Anonymous
The “goal” of the Iran war is now reportedly to open the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war began
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


It really annoys me when people equate being mad the US started a war we didn't need to with being an Iranian sympathizer. I simply didn't think it was the right decision to preemptively strike the country with no imminent threat. Of course the Iranian regime is not a positive force but us meddling with them only makes us more entangled.


I was referring to the idiot who claimed Israel attacked Diego Garcia as a false flag, while we all know it was Iran and has been reported in multiple sources as being Iran. There was no false flag. THAT is an Iranian regime sympathizer.


Of course, of course! It’s not as if we’ve learned days, weeks, months, and sometimes years later that what we thought to be the case initially was dead wrong. No, no - of course! Etch it in stone that Iran was responsible.


You report back when all international sources agree it was Israel. For now, that's just wishful thinking in your crazy imagination.


Tel Aviv is for low IQ mouthbreathers who believe in fairytales? True or false?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


It really annoys me when people equate being mad the US started a war we didn't need to with being an Iranian sympathizer. I simply didn't think it was the right decision to preemptively strike the country with no imminent threat. Of course the Iranian regime is not a positive force but us meddling with them only makes us more entangled.


I was referring to the idiot who claimed Israel attacked Diego Garcia as a false flag, while we all know it was Iran and has been reported in multiple sources as being Iran. There was no false flag. THAT is an Iranian regime sympathizer.


Of course, of course! It’s not as if we’ve learned days, weeks, months, and sometimes years later that what we thought to be the case initially was dead wrong. No, no - of course! Etch it in stone that Iran was responsible.


You report back when all international sources agree it was Israel. For now, that's just wishful thinking in your crazy imagination.


You’ll do anything to defend your community even if it’s abroad but not America.


Not my community, dunce. But if I had to choose between aligning myself with Israel or with Iran, I would definitely choose Israel. And no need for you to feign outrage, because it's clear you've chosen to champion the Iranian regime.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


Eh, everyone knows Israel MO is false flags. Long history of doing and most people can name actual incidents of Israel getting caught. Mossad agents already tried attacking gulf state oil infrastructure and were arrested.
Plus mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky confirmed this behavior in his book by Way of Deception.

It's pretty hilarious how desperate Israel is to try and get other countries including all of Europe to fight its war. Guess just leaching of the US isn't cutting it.

This article conveniently came out right after the Diego Gracia attack. Funny.


Muhanad Seloom, lecturer at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, told Al Jazeera that the reported Iranian attack “changes the calculus” of the war for the US.

“These missiles to Diego Garcia mean Iran has 4,000km-plus ballistic missiles, and that hasn’t been revealed before. All reports before that said Iran had a 2,000km [1,240-mile] range and not beyond that,” Seloom said.

“If you reverse the direction of these missiles, then they could reach London, so that changes the calculus not only for the US and its justification for the war but also for a reluctant London and European Union to join the war.”

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/22/did-iran-launch-missiles-at-us-uk-base-on-diego-garcia-heres-what-to-know


Fascinating! And who benefits the most from that convenient change in calculus?

Iran? Or Israel?

Meanwhile, we’re expected to play along and look past the fact that, what?

That we didn’t try to blame the school slaughter on Iran? That U.S. intelligence and Israeli intelligence apparently are so incompetent that neither of them had evidence of these missiles until now, when trotting such evidence out before Congress would have galvanized enough support from both sides of the aisle to avoid what is going to become massive anti-war momentum?

We’re believing that, are we now?

TFOH …


You're free to believe whatever you want. Don't speak for others by using the royal "we."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


It really annoys me when people equate being mad the US started a war we didn't need to with being an Iranian sympathizer. I simply didn't think it was the right decision to preemptively strike the country with no imminent threat. Of course the Iranian regime is not a positive force but us meddling with them only makes us more entangled.


I was referring to the idiot who claimed Israel attacked Diego Garcia as a false flag, while we all know it was Iran and has been reported in multiple sources as being Iran. There was no false flag. THAT is an Iranian regime sympathizer.


Of course, of course! It’s not as if we’ve learned days, weeks, months, and sometimes years later that what we thought to be the case initially was dead wrong. No, no - of course! Etch it in stone that Iran was responsible.


You report back when all international sources agree it was Israel. For now, that's just wishful thinking in your crazy imagination.


You’ll do anything to defend your community even if it’s abroad but not America.


Not my community, dunce. But if I had to choose between aligning myself with Israel or with Iran, I would definitely choose Israel. And no need for you to feign outrage, because it's clear you've chosen to champion the Iranian regime.


DP Sure, of course you’re not an Israeli propagandist, Jan. Totally not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


It really annoys me when people equate being mad the US started a war we didn't need to with being an Iranian sympathizer. I simply didn't think it was the right decision to preemptively strike the country with no imminent threat. Of course the Iranian regime is not a positive force but us meddling with them only makes us more entangled.


I was referring to the idiot who claimed Israel attacked Diego Garcia as a false flag, while we all know it was Iran and has been reported in multiple sources as being Iran. There was no false flag. THAT is an Iranian regime sympathizer.


Of course, of course! It’s not as if we’ve learned days, weeks, months, and sometimes years later that what we thought to be the case initially was dead wrong. No, no - of course! Etch it in stone that Iran was responsible.


You report back when all international sources agree it was Israel. For now, that's just wishful thinking in your crazy imagination.


Tel Aviv is for low IQ mouthbreathers who believe in fairytales? True or false?


Who are you even talking to? You have a desperate need to pick fights with posters you disagree with. Go take out your aggression elsewhere.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


It really annoys me when people equate being mad the US started a war we didn't need to with being an Iranian sympathizer. I simply didn't think it was the right decision to preemptively strike the country with no imminent threat. Of course the Iranian regime is not a positive force but us meddling with them only makes us more entangled.


I was referring to the idiot who claimed Israel attacked Diego Garcia as a false flag, while we all know it was Iran and has been reported in multiple sources as being Iran. There was no false flag. THAT is an Iranian regime sympathizer.


Of course, of course! It’s not as if we’ve learned days, weeks, months, and sometimes years later that what we thought to be the case initially was dead wrong. No, no - of course! Etch it in stone that Iran was responsible.


You report back when all international sources agree it was Israel. For now, that's just wishful thinking in your crazy imagination.


You’ll do anything to defend your community even if it’s abroad but not America.


Not my community, dunce. But if I had to choose between aligning myself with Israel or with Iran, I would definitely choose Israel. And no need for you to feign outrage, because it's clear you've chosen to champion the Iranian regime.


So not wanting a global energy crisis and not wanting American kids as canon fodder for no reason is pro-Iranian? That’s news to me.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


Eh, everyone knows Israel MO is false flags. Long history of doing and most people can name actual incidents of Israel getting caught. Mossad agents already tried attacking gulf state oil infrastructure and were arrested.
Plus mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky confirmed this behavior in his book by Way of Deception.

It's pretty hilarious how desperate Israel is to try and get other countries including all of Europe to fight its war. Guess just leaching of the US isn't cutting it.

This article conveniently came out right after the Diego Gracia attack. Funny.


Muhanad Seloom, lecturer at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, told Al Jazeera that the reported Iranian attack “changes the calculus” of the war for the US.

“These missiles to Diego Garcia mean Iran has 4,000km-plus ballistic missiles, and that hasn’t been revealed before. All reports before that said Iran had a 2,000km [1,240-mile] range and not beyond that,” Seloom said.

“If you reverse the direction of these missiles, then they could reach London, so that changes the calculus not only for the US and its justification for the war but also for a reluctant London and European Union to join the war.”

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/22/did-iran-launch-missiles-at-us-uk-base-on-diego-garcia-heres-what-to-know


Fascinating! And who benefits the most from that convenient change in calculus?

Iran? Or Israel?

Meanwhile, we’re expected to play along and look past the fact that, what?

That we didn’t try to blame the school slaughter on Iran? That U.S. intelligence and Israeli intelligence apparently are so incompetent that neither of them had evidence of these missiles until now, when trotting such evidence out before Congress would have galvanized enough support from both sides of the aisle to avoid what is going to become massive anti-war momentum?

We’re believing that, are we now?

TFOH …


You're free to believe whatever you want. Don't speak for others by using the royal "we."


Yeah, that’s the kind of shitty capitulation I’d expect from an Israeli stooge if the didn’t have the U.S. to cash checks they kept writing with their big mouths.
Anonymous
“The United States has been sanctioning Iran for years. It has also been bombing Iran for three weeks. These are, in the normal course of events, complementary activities. One is economic warfare. The other is the regular kind.

This week, the US Treasury lifted all oil sanctions on Iran. For 30 days. 140 million barrels of Iranian crude, sitting on ships at sea, may now be sold freely on the global market. Including to the United States itself.

In yuan.

The United States is purchasing, with Chinese currency, oil from the country it is currently bombing?“

https://no01.substack.com/p/march-19-21-god-is-a-comedian?r=1emko&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know the Iranian regime sympathizers are getting nervous when they have to lie about Israeli "false flags." Such a pathetic tactic.


It really annoys me when people equate being mad the US started a war we didn't need to with being an Iranian sympathizer. I simply didn't think it was the right decision to preemptively strike the country with no imminent threat. Of course the Iranian regime is not a positive force but us meddling with them only makes us more entangled.


I was referring to the idiot who claimed Israel attacked Diego Garcia as a false flag, while we all know it was Iran and has been reported in multiple sources as being Iran. There was no false flag. THAT is an Iranian regime sympathizer.


Of course, of course! It’s not as if we’ve learned days, weeks, months, and sometimes years later that what we thought to be the case initially was dead wrong. No, no - of course! Etch it in stone that Iran was responsible.


You report back when all international sources agree it was Israel. For now, that's just wishful thinking in your crazy imagination.


Tel Aviv is for low IQ mouthbreathers who believe in fairytales? True or false?


Who are you even talking to? You have a desperate need to pick fights with posters you disagree with. Go take out your aggression elsewhere.


You misspelled “yeah”.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: