Fire in upper NW?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
It bothers me that the story we were given does not jibe and no one cares any longer. It's not over, so maybe the full story will
come out eventually but, as it stands, something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

This case is bigger than Wint.

[Anonymous]

Wint won't give up any information about his accomplices. It's probably it's someone he's close to, maybe his brother, or someone he's afraid of. Also, he has nothing to gain by helping in the investigation. I'm sure the prosecutors won't offer him anything less than life without parole. Because there's no death penalty in DC, they really have nothing to bargain with.

[Anonymous]

It's awful but I do sort of wish they could offer him a little something in the way of his prison time that would provide some incentive. Like, look...we can give you a roommate that just hates child killers or we can give you a cell mate that REALLY hates child killers--if you want the choice, you're going to have to play ball here.

[Anonymous]

More than knowing who his accomplices were...I'm still so curious as to motive. I have a hard time comprehend in how this guy held a five plus year grudge on Mr. S and acted on it when he did. What was he doing all the time in between? Did Mr. S have any enemies? Was this more complex than just a thug looking for easy money. ??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to type this,but I'm getting nervous. I'm generally a let's stay out of the ay and let the police do their job person. And I know the court system takes a long time. But. I don't believe there was only one person. I am very suspicious of the folks he was traveling back from NY with. Something seems majorly off here. Maybe I just need to be patient, but this may be one of the biggest cases in DC, certainly in years, an i want justice served.

I'm worried too. The longer things go on with no news, the more I'm thinking it really was Wint acting alone. If he had co-conspirators, wouldn't he be blabbing about them in exchange for possible leniency?

I think if there was more going on with the investigation, there would be leaks to the press. IMO.

Things have been silent because W is now under the care now of the best criminal defense attorney in the city. If this goes to trial, it will be like a clinic in how to get away with murder. He has a lawyer who does not lose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to type this,but I'm getting nervous. I'm generally a let's stay out of the ay and let the police do their job person. And I know the court system takes a long time. But. I don't believe there was only one person. I am very suspicious of the folks he was traveling back from NY with. Something seems majorly off here. Maybe I just need to be patient, but this may be one of the biggest cases in DC, certainly in years, an i want justice served.

I'm worried too. The longer things go on with no news, the more I'm thinking it really was Wint acting alone. If he had co-conspirators, wouldn't he be blabbing about them in exchange for possible leniency?

I think if there was more going on with the investigation, there would be leaks to the press. IMO.

Things have been silent because W is now under the care now of the best criminal defense attorney in the city. If this goes to trial, it will be like a clinic in how to get away with murder. He has a lawyer who does not lose.

I thought he had a public defender.

[Anonymous]

If this goes to trial, afterward any former juror that wants one will have a book deal.

[Anonymous]

No, he's a former PDS. Legal fee $$$$$$ minimum. Someone is very connected ...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, he's a former PDS. Legal fee $$$$$$ minimum. Someone is very connected ...

Reference please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, he's a former PDS. Legal fee $$$$$$ minimum. Someone is very connected ...

What's a PDS?

[Anonymous]

Maybe it was a hit afterall. Maybe Wint could turn in whomever he was working / for / with etc and they are feeling exposed. How could this nasty slime thug otherwise be connected to any real lawyer ? How will this lawyer ever sleep again or look at himself in the mirror though.

[Anonymous]

Somebody give the attorney's name please. I can't find it in news sources online. If Wint's defense is "I was there but I didn't do the actual killing" then they would be better off if they have someone they can pin it on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, he's a former PDS. Legal fee $$$$$$ minimum. Someone is very connected ...

Reference please.

http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/need-a-good-lawyer/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe it was a hit afterall. Maybe Wint could turn in whomever he was working / for / with etc and they are feeling exposed. How could this nasty slime thug otherwise be connected to any real lawyer ? How will this lawyer ever sleep again or look at himself in the mirror though.

you know nothing--your question betrays your lack of understanding of the profession. Or perhaps, you know, justice will be truly served only when the most guilty among us is defended as vigorously as the innocent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, he's a former PDS. Legal fee $$$$$$ minimum. Someone is very connected ...

Reference please.

http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/need-a-good-lawyer/

ES?