Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aside from their colossal sanctimonious hypocrisy, the main problem with H & M is that they don’t have any idea what they WANT to be doing. They’re literally throwing a million complaints, grievances, careers, projects, identities, etc at the wall to see what sticks. It’s simultaneously amusing and sad.

+1. It is pretty amusing. How many times have they claimed to be victimized since their wedding day? By how many different people and organizations? The BRF as a whole, the press, the “racist” family member they won’t identify, the staff who accused Meghan of bullying. The list goes on and on. And how many different jobs are they currently attempting? Podcasters, TV hosts/producers, investors in coffee businesses, executives at mental health start ups. It’s chaotic. They just seem kind of lost.

No, they seem like a boss ass couple. Sorry you and your hubby with your federal jobs can't relate.

My husband and I aren’t perfect, but if I were suicidal, he wouldn’t refuse to help me out of embarrassment. What a terrible partner.

I don't know the inner workings of their marriage, how that conversation came to be, etc. I do understand suicidal thoughts and, even with that, I can only imagine how that scenario went down. Either way, I'm glad they're both in better mental spaces.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

I understand that's why he still HAS titles. What I am asking is why are they still using them publicly if they despirse so much the institution the titles represent.

H&M: "The BRF is toxic and racist and hates us."
Also H&M: "Please call us by our BRF titles at all times."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aside from their colossal sanctimonious hypocrisy, the main problem with H & M is that they don’t have any idea what they WANT to be doing. They’re literally throwing a million complaints, grievances, careers, projects, identities, etc at the wall to see what sticks. It’s simultaneously amusing and sad.

+1. It is pretty amusing. How many times have they claimed to be victimized since their wedding day? By how many different people and organizations? The BRF as a whole, the press, the “racist” family member they won’t identify, the staff who accused Meghan of bullying. The list goes on and on. And how many different jobs are they currently attempting? Podcasters, TV hosts/producers, investors in coffee businesses, executives at mental health start ups. It’s chaotic. They just seem kind of lost.

They gave one interview.

+1 All these posts about their "constant whining". You mean the whining you knew nothing about until the ONE interview?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

Are the other royals endlessly whining?

Didn't Andrew just put a fight to wear an Admiral's outfit at his own father's funeral? There's whining and then there's that -- complete disgrace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"We hold these truths to be self-evident -- that all monarchs are usurpers and descendants of usurpers; for the reason that no throne was ever set up in this world by the will, freely exercised, of the only body possessing the legitimate right to set it up -- the numerical mass of the nation."

We have no princes, dukes nor duchesses here in the United States. Nor should we ever.

Signed, We The People (who have no countenance nor patience for the royally titled)

+1 Let them fall...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

Are the other royals endlessly whining?

None are, including H&M.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

I understand that's why he still HAS titles. What I am asking is why are they still using them publicly if they despirse so much the institution the titles represent.

H&M: "The BRF is toxic and racist and hates us."
Also H&M: "Please call us by our BRF titles at all times."

Again, cause they're his. May have associations that tie to his identity, despite the flawed system. Not my decision to judge. Or yours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

Are the other royals endlessly whining?

Didn't Andrew just put a fight to wear an Admiral's outfit at his own father's funeral? There's whining and then there's that -- complete disgrace.

You’re really reaching here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

I understand that's why he still HAS titles. What I am asking is why are they still using them publicly if they despirse so much the institution the titles represent.

H&M: "The BRF is toxic and racist and hates us."
Also H&M: "Please call us by our BRF titles at all times."

Again, cause they're his. May have associations that tie to his identity, despite the flawed system. Not my decision to judge. Or yours.

It’s hypocritical, whether you like it or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

Are the other royals endlessly whining?

None are, including H&M.

Really? Waah, daddy wouldn’t give me money.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Everything about them is hypocritical. They go visit poor villagers in Africa then complain that they’re not ok. They complain incessantly about the BRF but have never suggested giving up their titles. They have to make money for security, but then buy a $15M mansion and it seems the money they make will never be enough. They claim to want privacy, then arrange for PR fluff pieces and obvious pap walks. They are not very bright egomaniacs. It makes for a fascinating story to follow, but I’ll never watch their Netflix shows, listen to their Spotify or buy anything Meghan tries to merch. I suspect much of their “followers” are like me- interested in the story, but not buying what they’re trying to sell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

I understand that's why he still HAS titles. What I am asking is why are they still using them publicly if they despirse so much the institution the titles represent.

H&M: "The BRF is toxic and racist and hates us."
Also H&M: "Please call us by our BRF titles at all times."

Again, cause they're his. May have associations that tie to his identity, despite the flawed system. Not my decision to judge. Or yours.

It reeks of insincerity and childish tantrums.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

I understand that's why he still HAS titles. What I am asking is why are they still using them publicly if they despirse so much the institution the titles represent.

H&M: "The BRF is toxic and racist and hates us."
Also H&M: "Please call us by our BRF titles at all times."

Again, cause they're his. May have associations that tie to his identity, despite the flawed system. Not my decision to judge. Or yours.

It reeks of insincerity and childish tantrums.

Agreed. It was childish of Charles to cut off their security. It was insincere power move that massively backfired. Charles miscalculated that if he pulled their security it would force them back under whatever terms he dictated.

Boy did end up being immature and tone deaf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

I understand that's why he still HAS titles. What I am asking is why are they still using them publicly if they despirse so much the institution the titles represent.

H&M: "The BRF is toxic and racist and hates us."
Also H&M: "Please call us by our BRF titles at all times."

Again, cause they're his. May have associations that tie to his identity, despite the flawed system. Not my decision to judge. Or yours.

It’s hypocritical, whether you like it or not.

It's really not but okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it interesting that they still use their titles, are upset that Archie wasn't made a prince, and yet cry about how toxic the whole family is? Seems a bit hypocritical.

Titles are his, by birth. No less his than any of the other made up titles they honor.

I understand that's why he still HAS titles. What I am asking is why are they still using them publicly if they despirse so much the institution the titles represent.

H&M: "The BRF is toxic and racist and hates us."
Also H&M: "Please call us by our BRF titles at all times."

Again, cause they're his. May have associations that tie to his identity, despite the flawed system. Not my decision to judge. Or yours.

It reeks of insincerity and childish tantrums.

Agreed. It was childish of Charles to cut off their security. It was insincere power move that massively backfired. Charles miscalculated that if he pulled their security it would force them back under whatever terms he dictated.

Boy did end up being immature and tone deaf.

Agreed. The BRF gambled but they were dealing with a new Harry. Whatever happens with them as a couple, I'm glad that he's grown into himself as a man. I think his Mom would be proud.