Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

DP. Harry has used wounded veterans to self-promote himself and make money for his charity. Your turn -- explain why you feel he is worth defending.

The Invictus Games funds help wounded warriors regardless of the warriors countries of origin. I find that admirable, especially for soldiers from countries with less support and funding for these men and women. As for PH using his image to promote and self-promote, his image and promotion is why the corporations and donors commit funds. He is doing what Eunice Kennedy Shriver did for the Special Olympics. Without her self-promotion, there would be no Special Olympics today. I just don't get the hate on somebody trying to help others. Weird ASF

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They're both dolts. And they have staunch defenders, ready to attack DCUMers in a way that isn't really supposed to happen. But does. Because Meghan and Harry are that special.

Still don’t explain why you get so triggered by what they say...it’s really easy to ignore them.

So why are you so triggered by what people say about the Harkles……..isn’t it equally easy to ignore that?

Yes, why do you take the time to defend H&M? You could have walked away from this discussion 301 pages ago.

+1. At least H&M are famous people. You’re spending your energy worrying about random anonymous posters.

Nope, no time spent worrying. I find the vociferous defense fascinating in light of the numerous times that H&M have been caught making statements that contradict earlier statements. Was hoping that a defender would taking the time to reflect and explain their support.

You first. Why don’t you explain your hate of these people you don’t know? It takes a lot of energy and projection to hate someone.

DP. But Stop being dramatic. PP wasn’t “hating” anyone- just making a comment.most of us who are critical of H and Ms motivations and actions don’t hate them. Just wish they’d stop with the hypocrisy.

DP-- Well you have not been reading these posts honestly. Many posters have come right out and posted that they hate them.

DP. That's the thing about fame. Some will hate you, and it isn't personal.

These two take everything personally. Because they're dolts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When is this baby girl expected?

What baby? You mean Lilibet? She was born ages ago. She's old news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And we are not fascinated with people like you who pretend to be indifferent yet constantly post updates and opinions about specific celebrities lying when every famous person lies. Something about these two bothers you (it’s racism against MM for a lot of ppl) and it’s not the lying.

Meh. You know nothing about me, racially or otherwise. I note that you just attacked me personally rather than provide any analysis, although you do acknowledge that H&M have made contradictory statements. Interesting.

DP. Have you have made contradictory statements during your lifetime?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With regards to Harry, it is not crazy town to point out the sheer audacity of this man to use a charity to enrich his already wealthy self.

Agree.

I find it very interesting how quickly this FACTUAL information about Harry gets quickly buried by name-calling posts every time it comes up.

Why aren't all these H&M fans coming to his defense with FACTUAL rebuttals?

Because there are none.

Exploiting wounded servicemembers is beyond despicable.

I didn’t see any facts that Harry was exploiting wounded service members. I saw evidence that he isn’t the first person to start a charity involving veterans and he seems to have limited familiarity with US organizations that do the same things as Invictus. Scandalous!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/why-prince-harry-called-in-lawyers-over-canceled-invictus-games-fundraiser/ar-BB18OJuE

Good gosh people are lazy.

This article does not provide any evidence that Harry was exploiting service members. It says a concert was canceled due to Covid and both Amazon and Netflix have interest in streaming fundraisers for the invictus games. how many live concerts did you go to last year?

How long did it take you to come up with that rote "absense of evidence" rebuttal? It doesn't even hold water in this case since there is actual evidence:

FACT: First Department of Defense Warrior Game was held in 2010. https://www.dodwarriorgames.com/

FACT: Harry visited in 2014 "Prince Harry joked Thursday that a Paralympic-style sporting championship for injured servicemen and women known as the Warrior Games was "such a good idea by the Americans that it had to be stolen." (Newsweek)

FACT: The DoD Warrior Games is scheduled in 2021 at the ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex at Walt Disney World Resort which DONATED their facility. This shows the importance of these games for the WOUNDED doesn't depend on fundraisers because they are sponsored by US government and supported by corporations, in accordance with U.S. government ethics laws.

FACT: When Harry couldn't do a fundraiser (money going to HIS charity) then he threatens with a lawsuit. (Newsweek 9/20)

FACT: In a March 2019 survey, a 72% majority of U.S. adults (and identical 72% shares of Republicans and Democrats) said that if they were making the federal budget, they would increase spending for veterans’ benefits and services

FACT: Because of these statistics, it has been proven that exploitation will occur and has been occurring, as was discussed in 2007 in Congress:
https://www.charitywatch.org/charity-donating-articles/our-veterans-deserve-better-congressional-testimony

FACT: The definition of exploitation:
use or utilization, especially for profit
selfish utilization:
the combined, often varied, use of public-relations and advertising techniques to promote a person, movie, product, etc.

Anyone who defends Harry and his shady Invictus Games, including corporations, should be roundly criticized and boycotted.

The Warrior Games was limited to US service members only. It may be international now, but I do not think so. Harry was inspired by the Game and created the Invictus Games that the Obamas endorsed. But oh well.

We should totally do a spin-off thread for the Obamas. They some shady people too.

Only to those people who revere the Trumps, McConnells, Hannitys, Greenes, etc. But go on PP with your bad, shady self.

[Anonymous]

Ok since everyone was griping about how boring the thread was:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1459264/meghan-markle-news-duchess-sussex-shoot-sex-object-royal-family-suits-spt

Have at it (old news for most watchers) but let the stans commence! Watch them lose it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With regards to Harry, it is not crazy town to point out the sheer audacity of this man to use a charity to enrich his already wealthy self.

Agree.

I find it very interesting how quickly this FACTUAL information about Harry gets quickly buried by name-calling posts every time it comes up.

Why aren't all these H&M fans coming to his defense with FACTUAL rebuttals?

Because there are none.

Exploiting wounded servicemembers is beyond despicable.

I didn’t see any facts that Harry was exploiting wounded service members. I saw evidence that he isn’t the first person to start a charity involving veterans and he seems to have limited familiarity with US organizations that do the same things as Invictus. Scandalous!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/why-prince-harry-called-in-lawyers-over-canceled-invictus-games-fundraiser/ar-BB18OJuE

Good gosh people are lazy.

This article does not provide any evidence that Harry was exploiting service members. It says a concert was canceled due to Covid and both Amazon and Netflix have interest in streaming fundraisers for the invictus games. how many live concerts did you go to last year?

How long did it take you to come up with that rote "absense of evidence" rebuttal? It doesn't even hold water in this case since there is actual evidence:

FACT: First Department of Defense Warrior Game was held in 2010. https://www.dodwarriorgames.com/

FACT: Harry visited in 2014 "Prince Harry joked Thursday that a Paralympic-style sporting championship for injured servicemen and women known as the Warrior Games was "such a good idea by the Americans that it had to be stolen." (Newsweek)

FACT: The DoD Warrior Games is scheduled in 2021 at the ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex at Walt Disney World Resort which DONATED their facility. This shows the importance of these games for the WOUNDED doesn't depend on fundraisers because they are sponsored by US government and supported by corporations, in accordance with U.S. government ethics laws.

FACT: When Harry couldn't do a fundraiser (money going to HIS charity) then he threatens with a lawsuit. (Newsweek 9/20)

FACT: In a March 2019 survey, a 72% majority of U.S. adults (and identical 72% shares of Republicans and Democrats) said that if they were making the federal budget, they would increase spending for veterans’ benefits and services

FACT: Because of these statistics, it has been proven that exploitation will occur and has been occurring, as was discussed in 2007 in Congress:
https://www.charitywatch.org/charity-donating-articles/our-veterans-deserve-better-congressional-testimony

FACT: The definition of exploitation:
use or utilization, especially for profit
selfish utilization:
the combined, often varied, use of public-relations and advertising techniques to promote a person, movie, product, etc.

Anyone who defends Harry and his shady Invictus Games, including corporations, should be roundly criticized and boycotted.

The Warrior Games was limited to US service members only. It may be international now, but I do not think so. Harry was inspired by the Game and created the Invictus Games that the Obamas endorsed. But oh well.

We should totally do a spin-off thread for the Obamas. They some shady people too.

Only to those people who revere the Trumps, McConnells, Hannitys, Greenes, etc. But go on PP with your bad, shady self.

Huh? What a weird association.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The Archewell terms and conditions make it clear that anyone sharing a story signs over “an irrevocable, royalty free, fully paid up, in perpetuity, worldwide, assignable licence to publish, broadcast, and use, in any media now known or hereafter developed” not merely to the Sussexes’ charitable foundation, but also to their limited liability company Archewell LLC, Archewell Productions (through which the couple hold their multi-million-dollar deal with Netflix) and Archewell Audio (through which they have a similar deal with podcast giant Spotify)."

So noble and brave to profit from other's stories because of shady terms and conditions on your foundation website.

https://www.private-eye.co.uk/issue-1549/news

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hidden-message-prince-harry-meghan-24493053

Just despicable.

So they are asking people to give them content but they want to be the ones to profit off of the content people give them.

Man, you people are in for a world of hurt when you figure out how the Facebooks work some day.

Tool for intelligence agencies most of us figured that out day one and don’t use it but go on with your bad self.

Darpa's LifeLog IS Facebook.

[Anonymous]

[twitter] https://www.twitter.com/Shawn_Tuesday/status/1414546991686750211[/twitter]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

You are delusional. They obviously mean Megan Rapinoe they just misspelled her name.

[Anonymous]

Am I the only person who checks this thread every few days to see why people are still posting? Because surely there must be some actual news to inspire so much interest in these people? But, nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You are delusional. They obviously mean Megan Rapinoe they just misspelled her name.

Uh... this was reported by numerous people, so not sure why you're calling people names. Rude as ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You are delusional. They obviously mean Megan Rapinoe they just misspelled her name.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1461620/meghan-markle-prince-harry-italy-v-england-victory-euro-2020-latest-pictures

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/meghan-markle-trending-soccer-match-175452271.html

https://www.newsweek.com/italy-fans-meghan-markle-banner-team-crush-england-euro-2020-final-1608808

Try harder.

[Anonymous]

Anything to get back into the news if the Cambridges make a public appearance since she has NOTHING else to offer. No talent. No news. Blissfully quiet until something comes along that Meagain can ride the coattails of.