Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rottenhouse was supposedly defending a business 4 BLOCKS AWAY from where the shooting took place. He was not defending the business in which he killed the first victim.

He will need to answer how he ended up 4 blocks away. But let’s face it: he was “on patrol” and looking for trouble. We saw him wandering all over the streets and cavorting with Kenosha PD. He was seeking the action and now he’s gonna end up in jail for a long time.

He was chased into the parking lot from far away. No ones knows what transpired before this. The only footage I’ve seen of these militia group and Rosenbaum interacting was at a gas station, where someone was trying to shove a lit dumpster nearby. Maybe something transpired there because someone had an issue with pushing a dumpster fire toward a gas station?

So? The facts are he killed people. He called the police on his cell phone and said he killed a man. Maybe the owner of gas station was retrieving his dumpster and the militia decided they did not like the look of him or he did not paid the protection fee to the militia. Many of the militia groups are just criminals extorting business owners.

Fyi he called a friend to say he'd killed someone, not the cops. It is in the charging documents

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You think he’s saddened having taken someone’s life or emboldened by his bravery?

I'm guessing the legions of people convinced he's a national hero will get to him and by the time this is all said and done, he'll be a right wing troll like George Zimmerman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the charges will be dropped.

Looking at the videos, any that aren't dropped will result in acquittal.

The gun charge might stick. The first altercation might stick, unless there's a new video I haven't seen.

Not even sure about the gun charge.

Soviet chick says what?

Dude brought a long gun across borders and inserted himself where he didn’t belong.

Soviet chick should stop using his first name. I realize she is a defense attorney but there is no reason to humanize this scummy piece of excrement.

He did not bring it across the state border.
....." his lawyer has said that Rittenhouse obtained the assault-style rifle from a friend in Wisconsin (meaning that he didn’t transport it with him from Illinois)".....

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/28/facebook-posts/did-kyle-rittenhouse-break-law-carrying-assault-st/

Interesting. Trying to protect his dad from IL felony charges.

It does put his "friend" in legal jeopardy though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Think about it: This racist little shitbird was six months away from being hired by some shitty police department, where he’d doubtlessly abuse hundreds of people. These are the type of deplorable racists who aspire to be cops. Need police reform now. Get rid of all the bad apples and start over; the bunch is spoiled.

If you want better people, you'll have to offer better pay and working conditions. I.e., fund the police.

Police make a LOT more money than you realize. They are nowhere near underpaid. They do have sketchy hiring practices though. The most egregious one is that people who score too high on an intelligence teat are automatically rejected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Great video of Colin Noir, who is a lawyer, breaking this all down with video clips. As he says, no way this kid is convicted. Especially with every 2nd Amendment lawyer in the country begging to defend him pro bono.

So, Kyle Rottenhouse was a legend in his own mind?

Noir had me paying attention until he compared Rottenhouse to 18 year old soldiers. If Rottenhouse experienced basic training and actual military discipline, that might be convincing. Instead he had a legend in his own mind with a itchy trigger finger. Lock him up. Forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the charges will be dropped.

Looking at the videos, any that aren't dropped will result in acquittal.

The gun charge might stick. The first altercation might stick, unless there's a new video I haven't seen.

Not even sure about the gun charge.

Soviet chick says what?

Dude brought a long gun across borders and inserted himself where he didn’t belong.

Soviet chick should stop using his first name. I realize she is a defense attorney but there is no reason to humanize this scummy piece of excrement.

He did not bring it across the state border.
....." his lawyer has said that Rittenhouse obtained the assault-style rifle from a friend in Wisconsin (meaning that he didn’t transport it with him from Illinois)".....

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/28/facebook-posts/did-kyle-rittenhouse-break-law-carrying-assault-st/

Interesting. Trying to protect his dad from IL felony charges.

It does put his "friend" in legal jeopardy though.

It's also super easy to prove one way or the other. Who has the weapon now? Where was it turned in? In whose name was it egistered?

I guess they're just trying to argue that he didn't take it into WO, since that would be a felony and open up felony murder charges. If he took it back to IL but did not bring it to WI tgen although it is still a felony the felony occurred after the killings and not before. Hence no felony murder.

But as I said, if the police are doing their basic job then this is easily proven or disproven.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Think about it: This racist little shitbird was six months away from being hired by some shitty police department, where he’d doubtlessly abuse hundreds of people. These are the type of deplorable racists who aspire to be cops. Need police reform now. Get rid of all the bad apples and start over; the bunch is spoiled.

If you want better people, you'll have to offer better pay and working conditions. I.e., fund the police.

Police make a LOT more money than you realize. They are nowhere near underpaid. They do have sketchy hiring practices though. The most egregious one is that people who score too high on an intelligence teat are automatically rejected.

not according to https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/What-Is-the-Average-Police-Officer-Salary-by-State. looks like about $50k

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Think about it: This racist little shitbird was six months away from being hired by some shitty police department, where he’d doubtlessly abuse hundreds of people. These are the type of deplorable racists who aspire to be cops. Need police reform now. Get rid of all the bad apples and start over; the bunch is spoiled.

If you want better people, you'll have to offer better pay and working conditions. I.e., fund the police.

Police make a LOT more money than you realize. They are nowhere near underpaid. They do have sketchy hiring practices though. The most egregious one is that people who score too high on an intelligence teat are automatically rejected.

not according to https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/What-Is-the-Average-Police-Officer-Salary-by-State. looks like about $50k

That's base. That does not include overtime, which is substantial. Plus a defined pension, extremel rare nowadays. Plus early retirement with full benefits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great video of Colin Noir, who is a lawyer, breaking this all down with video clips. As he says, no way this kid is convicted. Especially with every 2nd Amendment lawyer in the country begging to defend him pro bono.

So, Kyle Rottenhouse was a legend in his own mind?

Noir had me paying attention until he compared Rottenhouse to 18 year old soldiers. If Rottenhouse experienced basic training and actual military discipline, that might be convincing. Instead he had a legend in his own mind with a itchy trigger finger. Lock him up. Forever.

Your opinion of Rittenhouse doesn’t matter when it comes to whether he can legally claim that he was defending himself. There is video evidence out there that supports his claim. Also, it’s kind of petty to say “Noir had some points until he brought up 18 year olds dying in Iraq.” You obviously believe there’s some merit to a lot of Noir’s points aside from this statement.

[Anonymous]

Another note in the defenses favor is that the only eyewitness to the Rosenbaum killing that we know of is a reporter for the Daily Caller who verified that Rosenbaum was chasing Rittenhouse and trying to wrestle his gun away after Rittenhouse turned toward Rosenbaum after gunshots went off in the area. When you have video evidence and an eyewitness verifying Rittenhouse’s defense it’s going to be hard to convict Rittenhouse of anything besides weapons charges.

Also, the guy who later chased Rittenhouse with a handgun after the Rosenbaum shooting, who was shot in the forearm, is quoted on Facebook by his friend stating that he wished he “dumped the whole mag in him.” This guy is incriminating himself and should lawyer up as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another note in the defenses favor is that the only eyewitness to the Rosenbaum killing that we know of is a reporter for the Daily Caller who verified that Rosenbaum was chasing Rittenhouse and trying to wrestle his gun away after Rittenhouse turned toward Rosenbaum after gunshots went off in the area. When you have video evidence and an eyewitness verifying Rittenhouse’s defense it’s going to be hard to convict Rittenhouse of anything besides weapons charges.

Also, the guy who later chased Rittenhouse with a handgun after the Rosenbaum shooting, who was shot in the forearm, is quoted on Facebook by his friend stating that he wished he “dumped the whole mag in him.” This guy is incriminating himself and should lawyer up as well.

Doesnt that make him the good guy with the gun? I can’t keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Think about it: This racist little shitbird was six months away from being hired by some shitty police department, where he’d doubtlessly abuse hundreds of people. These are the type of deplorable racists who aspire to be cops. Need police reform now. Get rid of all the bad apples and start over; the bunch is spoiled.

If you want better people, you'll have to offer better pay and working conditions. I.e., fund the police.

Police make a LOT more money than you realize. They are nowhere near underpaid. They do have sketchy hiring practices though. The most egregious one is that people who score too high on an intelligence teat are automatically rejected.

not according to https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/What-Is-the-Average-Police-Officer-Salary-by-State. looks like about $50k

Absolutely 100% wrong. The average cop salary that is carried by most of those sites includes hundreds of thousands of various special police who are glorified armed guards. A post-training, post-probationary cop in this region receives a base of between 65-85, plus overtime, plus enormous pension contributions, plus allowances, plus a take-home car that they are allowed to use for personal purposes such that commuting is free for them. A sergeant or detective averages over $100k and supervisory and managing personnel, from Lt through Ass’t Chief, typically receive roughly 115-185, plus the aforementioned perks and benefits. They cannot be fired absent felony charges and in some cases job-related felony convictions. They make dramatically more than comparable bouncers and guards and the are freely licensed to kill civilians for sport and pleasure.

[Anonymous]

Where is the murder weapon now? Who was it registered to? These are very important facts. If it was not turned in then that's a tampering with evidence charge and it goes towards intent.

Note: whether or not there is self-defemse it was still murder. Self-defense doesn't change the underlying act it just gives a get out of jail free card.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another note in the defenses favor is that the only eyewitness to the Rosenbaum killing that we know of is a reporter for the Daily Caller who verified that Rosenbaum was chasing Rittenhouse and trying to wrestle his gun away after Rittenhouse turned toward Rosenbaum after gunshots went off in the area. When you have video evidence and an eyewitness verifying Rittenhouse’s defense it’s going to be hard to convict Rittenhouse of anything besides weapons charges.

Also, the guy who later chased Rittenhouse with a handgun after the Rosenbaum shooting, who was shot in the forearm, is quoted on Facebook by his friend stating that he wished he “dumped the whole mag in him.” This guy is incriminating himself and should lawyer up as well.

Doesnt that make him the good guy with the gun? I can’t keep up.

Exactly. Victim 3 was the good guy with the gun. Victim 2 was the good guy with the skateboard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where is the murder weapon now? Who was it registered to? These are very important facts. If it was not turned in then that's a tampering with evidence charge and it goes towards intent.

Note: whether or not there is self-defemse it was still murder. Self-defense doesn't change the underlying act it just gives a get out of jail free card.

The underlying act is killing. It's only murder when you are convicted.