Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Doesn’t it look like a massive conflict of interest to have Hunter’s LLC receive $3.1 million from a Ukrainian gas company not long after his father was named the Obama Administration’s “point man” on Ukraine in February 2014? This is corruption. Why do so many people have a hard time admitting it?

President Trump used the power of his office to extort a head of state for his own political gain.

President Trump is who we are discussing, here. Once he has been dealt with, if you want to go after Biden, have at it.

If we decide that the rule of law is important, that is.

If the Constitution is "phony" and fake news, then what the hell does it matter what Hunter Biden did?

They don't have to wait, they can go after Hunter Biden now. The fact is, all these Rs can't stop sockpuppeting enough. Biden is not the president of the United States and did not blackmail the president of Ukraine.

Yeah, where are our Senate hearings on the issue?

[Anonymous]

One difference here is that the Trump Organization has been in the hotel business for decades - what are they supposed to do, shut down because their chairman became POTUS? Whereas Hunter Biden’s expertise in the Ukrainian gas business magically appeared right after his father became the Obama Administration’s point man on Ukraine. But since you prefer willful blindness, go ahead and equate the two situations.

Christ on a cross you can’t be this stupid.
Please lord-baby-Christmas-Jesus let this post be a parody.
Amen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ivanka and Jared reported $82M of income as White House Advisors last year.

Seems high. And that doesn't include the billion dolalr bailout of 666 Park Avenue.

They are White House Advisors.

Hunter Biden was a private citizen.

You want to keep playing the whataboutism game?

GTFOHWTMFBS



Link?

[Anonymous]

Eric Trump told golf writer James Dodson in 2014, responding to his question about who’s funding their golf course construction, ‘Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.’ I said, ‘Really?’ And he said, ‘Oh, yeah. We’ve got some guys that really, really love golf, and they’re really invested in our programs. We just go there all the time.’
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/05/eric-trump-russia-investment-golf-course

Donald Junior spoke at a real estate investment conference in 2008 and said “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross section of a lot of our assets” and “we see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”
https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-jr-sa...-pouring-in-from-russia-2018-2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Honest to goodness -- Of course Obama would have more flexibilty after the election. EVERY politician has more flexibility after an election.

Unless you're Trump. Then you have to try personal back channels because you literally can't get anything done ever.

Trump cut your taxes. And defeated ISIS! That is something.

You mean Trump cut HIS TAXES. Tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ivanka and Jared reported $82M of income as White House Advisors last year.

Seems high. And that doesn't include the billion dolalr bailout of 666 Park Avenue.

They are White House Advisors.

Hunter Biden was a private citizen.

You want to keep playing the whataboutism game?

GTFOHWTMFBS



Link?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/jared-kushner-and-ivanka-trump-made-at-least-82-million-in-outside-income-last-year-while-serving-in-the-white-house-filings-show/2018/06/11/a41d0720-6dab-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Doesn’t it look like a massive conflict of interest to have Hunter’s LLC receive $3.1 million from a Ukrainian gas company not long after his father was named the Obama Administration’s “point man” on Ukraine in February 2014? This is corruption. Why do so many people have a hard time admitting it?

President Trump used the power of his office to extort a head of state for his own political gain.

President Trump is who we are discussing, here. Once he has been dealt with, if you want to go after Biden, have at it.

If we decide that the rule of law is important, that is.

If the Constitution is "phony" and fake news, then what the hell does it matter what Hunter Biden did?

I know you really, really, really, really, really want to believe this, but there is zero proof or indication of this.

[Anonymous]

No surprise here. Dems are changing the language they are using based on what is polling best in battleground states.....



Rachael Bade
@rachaelmbade
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?

https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1195166773450092545

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Honest to goodness -- Of course Obama would have more flexibilty after the election. EVERY politician has more flexibility after an election.

Unless you're Trump. Then you have to try personal back channels because you literally can't get anything done ever.

Trump cut your taxes. And defeated ISIS! That is something.

My taxes went up. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trumps-tax-reform-appears-to-be-giving-more-money-back-to-republican-states-2019-04-23
And ISIS has not been defeated. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/mideast/defeated-isis-has-found-safe-haven-ungoverned-part-iraq-n1076081

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Doesn’t it look like a massive conflict of interest to have Hunter’s LLC receive $3.1 million from a Ukrainian gas company not long after his father was named the Obama Administration’s “point man” on Ukraine in February 2014? This is corruption. Why do so many people have a hard time admitting it?

President Trump used the power of his office to extort a head of state for his own political gain.

President Trump is who we are discussing, here. Once he has been dealt with, if you want to go after Biden, have at it.

If we decide that the rule of law is important, that is.

If the Constitution is "phony" and fake news, then what the hell does it matter what Hunter Biden did?

I know you really, really, really, really, really want to believe this, but there is zero proof or indication of this.

You know sworn testimony is the opposite of “zero indication,” right? What a ridiculous comment, PP.

[Anonymous]

Appealing to SCOTUS to hide his taxes. Because that's what innocent, law abiding people do. Trumpsters are the biggest ignoramuses ever. I hope you are all studying your Russian.

[Anonymous]

^ did the SCOTUS refuse to take the case?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No surprise here. Dems are changing the language they are using based on what is polling best in battleground states.....



Rachael Bade
@rachaelmbade
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?

https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1195166773450092545

Good. The country is deeply stupid. They need to spell it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No surprise here. Dems are changing the language they are using based on what is polling best in battleground states.....



Rachael Bade
@rachaelmbade
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?

https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1195166773450092545

Good. The country is deeply stupid. They need to spell it out.

But, as Nancy says, "It's not political." Nah. Not at all.
And, they are being "prayerful." Yep. Praying that this finally takes him down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No surprise here. Dems are changing the language they are using based on what is polling best in battleground states.....



Rachael Bade
@rachaelmbade
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds

It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?

https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1195166773450092545

Good. The country is deeply stupid. They need to spell it out.

If your strategy involves calling everyday Americans “deeply stupid”, I hope you enjoy losing.