Fairfax County Double Murder
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Why does someone keep writing “chargers”? Is that a typo or is that a thing in Virginia? |
Anonymous
| Any bets on who the witnesses are tomorrow? |
Anonymous
I do not personally know what it is, but I do believe we had people post about it on this thread fairly early on, before it was released in any media or public hearings. I’m assuming those people knew her. She also had some posts about it on her public Instagram, but she just showed some injuries from her activities and called it a “bleeding disorder.” One of those was definitely from one of the “mud runs” the defense tried to bring up. So I guess she was able to participate wising common sense, but probably wouldn’t have told someone it’s fine to cut her with a knife. |
Anonymous
+1. The state has to prove their case beyond a reasonable, not all, doubt. |
Anonymous
No way. Quick guilty. Even having a trial is as delulu of him as thinking he would get away with the murders. |
Anonymous
They just need to create "doubt." |
Anonymous
| Her phone being in a kitchen drawer needs to be a key point emphasized in closing arguments. |
Anonymous
|
What did Brendan do before he worked for the IRS? Anyone know?
|
Anonymous
| Has there ever been a more boring trial? |
Anonymous
|
Bunch of letters were admitted today. I haven't read all of them, just skimmed a few. These are the ones she wrote to Tess
https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%204.pdf https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%208.pdf https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%2011.pdf https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%202.pdf And her communications with Kate Brower about the documentary etc are here https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%2063.pdf |
Anonymous
Well no, they need to create REASONABLE doubt. And if it was Joe- why doesn't the blood splatter evidence support Joe being the killer? Why would the 911 calls happen the way they did? Why would Juliana suddenly be like "actually, it wasn't Joe, it was me and Brendan"? Like what possible motivation would she have to say she helped kill Christine, if she didn't? And how could someone who is demonstrably not very smart come up with such an elaborate lie, that matches ALL of the forensics and ALL of the driving patterns of the cars that day and ALL of the text evidence between them and Joe? Is their theory that she is actually completely innocent, but also a criminal mastermind who can make that entire scenario up out of thin air and have it MATCH everything the police found? And who wants very badly to throw her partner under the bus? That is not what I would call reasonable doubt. |
Anonymous
I read the first one and what stands out is the lack of any mention of Christine. I'd think an innocent person would be something like "I can't believe this tragedy has happened to your family and I wish I could be there to continue to be with Brendan and to support (child) as she grieves". Or SOMETHING. But this reads like Christine never existed and she's calling brendan's mom her MIL. So, so weird. |
Anonymous
Yeah - I don’t know a living soul who turns off their phone and places it in a drawer in another room especially a parent. |
Anonymous
Her letters are written like she knew they'd be exhibits someday. I don't know, maybe she's smarter than we give her credit for. |
Anonymous
Fair, but what did sharing these recordings accomplish? Nothing seemed to be in Brendan’s favor nor Christine’s. |