Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Among the many, many things I don’t get about these psycho’s plans: why would the dude have killed her? Cut her and raped her, maybe, based on the catfishing. Not saying that would be okay, imo! But it makes no sense that he would stab her to death?[/quote] The defense probably goes something like, "And then he lost control. You know how those sex fiends are."[/quote] So will defense call someone to testify to Joe's temperament, etc? Don't they need to paint him as a killer?[/quote] Joe is not on trial [/quote] The defense depends on Joe killing Christine. The messages show a consensual meet up. Why would he go nuts in the first 10 minutes when he's had no issues with many other meet ups? [/quote] They can’t find anyone to paint joe as a killer since he wasn’t one . And if they did find someone willing to paint him that way, the prosecution could then call 836 rebuttal witnesses to testify the exact opposite. So that’s why. [/quote] They just need to create "doubt."[/quote] Well no, they need to create REASONABLE doubt. And if it was Joe- why doesn't the blood splatter evidence support Joe being the killer? Why would the 911 calls happen the way they did? Why would Juliana suddenly be like "actually, it wasn't Joe, it was me and Brendan"? Like what possible motivation would she have to say she helped kill Christine, if she didn't? And how could someone who is demonstrably not very smart come up with such an elaborate lie, that matches ALL of the forensics and ALL of the driving patterns of the cars that day and ALL of the text evidence between them and Joe? Is their theory that she is actually completely innocent, but also a criminal mastermind who can make that entire scenario up out of thin air and have it MATCH everything the police found? And who wants very badly to throw her partner under the bus? That is not what I would call reasonable doubt. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics