I take that back the author went through NCAA division 1 websites one by one creating their own dataset. I cant see any issues with that. No way that a poor researcher would only include the data that fits their narrative. Materials and Methods 3.1. Participants The sample consisted of 1417 Division I volleyball athletes, including 1253 women and 164 males. Secondary data from the 2020–2021 school year were collected from the official athletic department websites, including 116 out of the 334 Division I women’s volleyball programs (represented 37% all DI Schools) and 12 out of the 48 combined Division I and II Men’s volleyball programs (represented 25% of all DI/II schools). This represented all the publicly available data at these levels and included, at minimum, each athlete’s birth month and birthday (see Supplementary Data File). |
Quiting soccer because everyone else was bigger than your kid as the youngest is the biggest deterament to college recruitment. In travel, the oddball is the one that plays up. Clubs don't let you pick and choose your kids age group, it is assigned based on birthdate. So stupid. |
No they dont. ECNL leadership and parents use playing in HS to try and recruit from MLSN all the time. Actually its usually their first go to. |
All depends on the HS, bub, some stink and kids never play for them, where club is 10x better. |
If your kid is no good they werent going to play in college anyway. Stop using rae to try and snowplow your kid onto an A team. |
Switching teams isn't extra effort, it is often what is required as kids get older to put them in position to play in college regardless of being misaligned or not. Others parents are always pissed, nobody cares, welcome to travel. If you are positioning you kid to keep other parent happy, you are parenting wrong. Players aren't welcomed to new teams, they just show up. Thinking a team is some kind of democracy is your problem, it doesn't work that way. |
What does it say then if a kid can't compete with a kid the same age? Deal with it OR find a club that does it the way you want. They exist, too. |
Ironically you are trying to create a rule that blocks that August girl so you can snowplow your September kid to the A team. Everyone is on to your twisted logic and lies about college recruiting. |
I guess you didn't see the part about how it represented "all publicly available data." It's just ... reality. |
You are completely selfish and wrong. Coaches / Clubs will filter out parents like you after a couple of seasons. Seen it happen multiple times. Unless your kid is a unicorn which I doubt is the case since all you want to do is play down. |
Realistically this could be the smartest path for August and September players, especially for boys. By mid U16/U17, being beyond puberty teams are more likely to let you play up a year also as you will be mostly beyond puberty and will have caught up to the age group above. Or you could just stay in your age group regardless of grade because as that club Eastside said a few days ago, college coaches don't care what your age group is. |
More like all public data that they wanted to represent. Theres a reason people tend to use the same datasets for things like this. Not their own hand crafted screenscrape. Its called credibility. Just like from the beginning of the article. It was obvious that the author was looking to prove their opinion. They weren't interested in letting the data show whatever it shows. |
In sports, following the rules isn't selfish, it's competition. Saying someone is selfish because their August girl is better than your Sept girl is loser talk. |
Is this your first rodeo reading a paper? Duh, researchers have to pick data to evaluate. |
You didn't notice the multiple number of December kids get filtered out by being the youngest and shoved to the 2nd teams and told that weren't very good when they would be stars and age group down. |