FCPS comprehensive boundary review

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People, the real work behind redistricting has already been done. There have got to be are already draft plans in place—this isn’t something that’s being worked out from scratch once these meetings are fine. Balancing enrollment, adjusting boundaries, and ensuring that the numbers mostly work for each school has been calculated already. It’s not a mystery! Move this neighborhood here, that one there, etc etc. It’s a simple formula and uses data that we already have.

When people here act as though there’s still a lot of debate or that the plan is in process, it shows a lack of understanding about how these decisions are made in within FCPS recently. Public opinion might change things at the margins for some school on a limited basis, but the demographics and school capacities have already been analyzed and balenced. Anyone who still believes the process is in the “early stages” is just clueless.

People are just going with what the school board and FCPS repeatedly states, in no equivocal terms, that no maps have been drawn or considered.

You may be right, but if they’ve drawn maps, that truly is a scandal of epic proportions. Lying to Fairfax families typically doesn’t go over well, especially when constituents repeatedly have asked for this information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, the real work behind redistricting has already been done. There have got to be are already draft plans in place—this isn’t something that’s being worked out from scratch once these meetings are fine. Balancing enrollment, adjusting boundaries, and ensuring that the numbers mostly work for each school has been calculated already. It’s not a mystery! Move this neighborhood here, that one there, etc etc. It’s a simple formula and uses data that we already have.

When people here act as though there’s still a lot of debate or that the plan is in process, it shows a lack of understanding about how these decisions are made in within FCPS recently. Public opinion might change things at the margins for some school on a limited basis, but the demographics and school capacities have already been analyzed and balenced. Anyone who still believes the process is in the “early stages” is just clueless.

People are just going with what the school board and FCPS repeatedly states, in no equivocal terms, that no maps have been drawn or considered.

You may be right, but if they’ve drawn maps, that truly is a scandal of epic proportions. Lying to Fairfax families typically doesn’t go over well, especially when constituents repeatedly have asked for this information.

The school system already had 99% of the data that they need. they know exactly how many kids are in each school, where everyone lives, and which buildings have space. They've got enrollment projections, demographic info, and bus routes.

Think about it for just even a minute. With such a huge, complex project affecting hundreds of thousands of families, who really really believes they haven't done some serious internal planning?

Yes, they're saying no firm maps exist yet. But they are NOT starting from scratch. They've run the numbers internally and “mapped” out some draft solutions. Not because they're being deceptive, but because that's just what a task like this requires.

The public meetings could catch issues the data might miss AND will appease those who complain the loudest. But let's all just be realistic about how planning processes work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, the real work behind redistricting has already been done. There have got to be are already draft plans in place—this isn’t something that’s being worked out from scratch once these meetings are fine. Balancing enrollment, adjusting boundaries, and ensuring that the numbers mostly work for each school has been calculated already. It’s not a mystery! Move this neighborhood here, that one there, etc etc. It’s a simple formula and uses data that we already have.

When people here act as though there’s still a lot of debate or that the plan is in process, it shows a lack of understanding about how these decisions are made in within FCPS recently. Public opinion might change things at the margins for some school on a limited basis, but the demographics and school capacities have already been analyzed and balenced. Anyone who still believes the process is in the “early stages” is just clueless.

People are just going with what the school board and FCPS repeatedly states, in no equivocal terms, that no maps have been drawn or considered.

You may be right, but if they’ve drawn maps, that truly is a scandal of epic proportions. Lying to Fairfax families typically doesn’t go over well, especially when constituents repeatedly have asked for this information.

The school system already had 99% of the data that they need. they know exactly how many kids are in each school, where everyone lives, and which buildings have space. They've got enrollment projections, demographic info, and bus routes.

Think about it for just even a minute. With such a huge, complex project affecting hundreds of thousands of families, who really really believes they haven't done some serious internal planning?

Yes, they're saying no firm maps exist yet. But they are NOT starting from scratch. They've run the numbers internally and “mapped” out some draft solutions. Not because they're being deceptive, but because that's just what a task like this requires.

The public meetings could catch issues the data might miss AND will appease those who complain the loudest. But let's all just be realistic about how planning processes work.

+1 they had all this information on day one . Hiring an out of state consultant to study this and provide recommendations was done to create a target other than themselves for the inevitable blowback from parents. Anyone who didn't immediately recognize this must not have ever worked with any level of government. It's pretty common.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, the real work behind redistricting has already been done. There have got to be are already draft plans in place—this isn’t something that’s being worked out from scratch once these meetings are fine. Balancing enrollment, adjusting boundaries, and ensuring that the numbers mostly work for each school has been calculated already. It’s not a mystery! Move this neighborhood here, that one there, etc etc. It’s a simple formula and uses data that we already have.

When people here act as though there’s still a lot of debate or that the plan is in process, it shows a lack of understanding about how these decisions are made in within FCPS recently. Public opinion might change things at the margins for some school on a limited basis, but the demographics and school capacities have already been analyzed and balenced. Anyone who still believes the process is in the “early stages” is just clueless.

I’m with you 100%. The work’s already done, but some people are just dragging this out to act like they have a say, when really, they’re just wasting time.

BRAC got a lot of applications because people were desperate to have a say, but the pyramid representatives are ultimately just a bunch of useful idiots for a superintendent and school board hellbent on destruction and whose incompetence and hypocrisy will come to haunt the local Democrats for many years.

If politicians on the Board of Supervisors like Dalia Palchik and Jimmy Bierman think they are ever getting elected again after turning a blind eye to the shenanigans of the likes of Michelle Reid, Robyn Lady, and Karl Frisch, they are going to be in for quite a rude awakening in two years.

[Anonymous]

hey #fairFACTS Matters please help the community that wants this boundary review scrapped:

1) we need a catchier domain URL like FCPSboundarychanges.com. Should be a splash page of the elevator pitch talking points regarding unethical/questionable things during this process.

2) we need volunteers to hold up signs at major intersections advertising that URL and "You're kids school boundary is changing!"

I think it could double, triple the eyes on this now and pressure on the SB this spring once new boundaries are proposed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:hey #fairFACTS Matters please help the community that wants this boundary review scrapped:

1) we need a catchier domain URL like FCPSboundarychanges.com. Should be a splash page of the elevator pitch talking points regarding unethical/questionable things during this process.

2) we need volunteers to hold up signs at major intersections advertising that URL and "You're kids school boundary is changing!"

I think it could double, triple the eyes on this now and pressure on the SB this spring once new boundaries are proposed

You do realize a lot families will be thrilled about the bolded. Do not assume all parents are on your side. You might just wake up a sleeping giant with your banners.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:hey #fairFACTS Matters please help the community that wants this boundary review scrapped:

1) we need a catchier domain URL like FCPSboundarychanges.com. Should be a splash page of the elevator pitch talking points regarding unethical/questionable things during this process.

2) we need volunteers to hold up signs at major intersections advertising that URL and "You're kids school boundary is changing!"

I think it could double, triple the eyes on this now and pressure on the SB this spring once new boundaries are proposed

You do realize a lot families will be thrilled about the bolded. Do not assume all parents are on your side. You might just wake up a sleeping giant with your banners.

DP.

🤣🤣🤣. Thanks for the morning laugh. I needed it. Such a ridiculous fantasy of yours!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:hey #fairFACTS Matters please help the community that wants this boundary review scrapped:

1) we need a catchier domain URL like FCPSboundarychanges.com. Should be a splash page of the elevator pitch talking points regarding unethical/questionable things during this process.

2) we need volunteers to hold up signs at major intersections advertising that URL and "You're kids school boundary is changing!"

I think it could double, triple the eyes on this now and pressure on the SB this spring once new boundaries are proposed

You do realize a lot families will be thrilled about the bolded. Do not assume all parents are on your side. You might just wake up a sleeping giant with your banners.

DP, but overall people oppose boundary changes and want to remain at their current schools. It’s not even close. Even the LWNJs like Vanessa want their own boundaries to remain the same; she certainly isn’t rallying her Mantua neighbors to move to Falls Church.

The School Board knew this going into this process based on the work of the prior consultant, but simply chose to ignore it. They stand to pay a high price in 2027 for their perfidy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, the real work behind redistricting has already been done. There have got to be are already draft plans in place—this isn’t something that’s being worked out from scratch once these meetings are fine. Balancing enrollment, adjusting boundaries, and ensuring that the numbers mostly work for each school has been calculated already. It’s not a mystery! Move this neighborhood here, that one there, etc etc. It’s a simple formula and uses data that we already have.

When people here act as though there’s still a lot of debate or that the plan is in process, it shows a lack of understanding about how these decisions are made in within FCPS recently. Public opinion might change things at the margins for some school on a limited basis, but the demographics and school capacities have already been analyzed and balenced. Anyone who still believes the process is in the “early stages” is just clueless.

People are just going with what the school board and FCPS repeatedly states, in no equivocal terms, that no maps have been drawn or considered.

You may be right, but if they’ve drawn maps, that truly is a scandal of epic proportions. Lying to Fairfax families typically doesn’t go over well, especially when constituents repeatedly have asked for this information.

The school system already had 99% of the data that they need. they know exactly how many kids are in each school, where everyone lives, and which buildings have space. They've got enrollment projections, demographic info, and bus routes.

Think about it for just even a minute. With such a huge, complex project affecting hundreds of thousands of families, who really really believes they haven't done some serious internal planning?

Yes, they're saying no firm maps exist yet. But they are NOT starting from scratch. They've run the numbers internally and “mapped” out some draft solutions. Not because they're being deceptive, but because that's just what a task like this requires.

The public meetings could catch issues the data might miss AND will appease those who complain the loudest. But let's all just be realistic about how planning processes work.

Before the changes to 8130 even passed Dr Reid was describing what their models showed (that elementary assignments were more likely to change than high school.)

[Anonymous]

Does anyone have a guess on what the new map lines would look like for Chantily High? When do we believe the maps will be out for the public?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People, the real work behind redistricting has already been done. There have got to be are already draft plans in place—this isn’t something that’s being worked out from scratch once these meetings are fine. Balancing enrollment, adjusting boundaries, and ensuring that the numbers mostly work for each school has been calculated already. It’s not a mystery! Move this neighborhood here, that one there, etc etc. It’s a simple formula and uses data that we already have.

When people here act as though there’s still a lot of debate or that the plan is in process, it shows a lack of understanding about how these decisions are made in within FCPS recently. Public opinion might change things at the margins for some school on a limited basis, but the demographics and school capacities have already been analyzed and balenced. Anyone who still believes the process is in the “early stages” is just clueless.

I agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:hey #fairFACTS Matters please help the community that wants this boundary review scrapped:

1) we need a catchier domain URL like FCPSboundarychanges.com. Should be a splash page of the elevator pitch talking points regarding unethical/questionable things during this process.

2) we need volunteers to hold up signs at major intersections advertising that URL and "You're kids school boundary is changing!"

I think it could double, triple the eyes on this now and pressure on the SB this spring once new boundaries are proposed

Fairfacts is very inclusive of volunteers.

If you have website skills or protest experience, definitely reach out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:hey #fairFACTS Matters please help the community that wants this boundary review scrapped:

1) we need a catchier domain URL like FCPSboundarychanges.com. Should be a splash page of the elevator pitch talking points regarding unethical/questionable things during this process.

2) we need volunteers to hold up signs at major intersections advertising that URL and "You're kids school boundary is changing!"

I think it could double, triple the eyes on this now and pressure on the SB this spring once new boundaries are proposed

You do realize a lot families will be thrilled about the bolded. Do not assume all parents are on your side. You might just wake up a sleeping giant with your banners.

Yeah, you don't know many parents with school aged kids if you think that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a guess on what the new map lines would look like for Chantily High? When do we believe the maps will be out for the public?

Maps are supposed to be released in the spring (April/May timeframe.)

With the Centreville expansion slated to completed for the 2029-30 school year, I would anticipate more changes at the elementary school level this round to align them for potential shifts when the new seats open.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:hey #fairFACTS Matters please help the community that wants this boundary review scrapped:

1) we need a catchier domain URL like FCPSboundarychanges.com. Should be a splash page of the elevator pitch talking points regarding unethical/questionable things during this process.

2) we need volunteers to hold up signs at major intersections advertising that URL and "You're kids school boundary is changing!"

I think it could double, triple the eyes on this now and pressure on the SB this spring once new boundaries are proposed

You do realize a lot families will be thrilled about the bolded. Do not assume all parents are on your side. You might just wake up a sleeping giant with your banners.

Yeah, you don't know many parents with school aged kids if you think that.

I would think parents of older kids would be more enraged. Elementary kids usually have a much easier time making new friends. I see it all the time at the private school where I teach. Now,
Now, if the kid is a jerk, they won’t be making friends, period!