US Capitol Breached by Trump's lunatics - The Commision Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are the serious people at DOJ?

Time to replace Garland with someone with the stones to do the job. He needs to retire from public service.

If you think the DOJ isn't working through this as efficiently and quickly as it can, I don't know what to tell you. Stop buying the "Garland isn't doing anything" BS - it undermines what is really happening, which is quite a lot, if you are paying attention.

Yeah. He’ll get to it after they indict Gaetz. Too many investigations are piling up with no action by the DOJ.

We need to start seeing indictments.

[Anonymous]

We need media accountability. They’ve been torpedoing Biden because they want their toddler back. Frankly, if it comes out that these “journalists” did know about the coup ahead of the fact and didn’t bother to alert anyone - least of all the American public! - they need to see charges with the people who planned the coup. Toxic GOP-friendly media is going to ruin this country, and these are supposed to be the “mainstream” people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

uh oh.. he's not toeing the R party line. How can the leader of the party in Congress want the commission to investigate but not condemn the Rs congress people who supported the insurrection. Lot of hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance going on there.

[Anonymous]

This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:

The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:

The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved

sure, that's why McConnell is saying the committee should investigate.

Why haven't they raised this as an issue if it was real?

Are you smarter than all the Rs in Congress ? Or are the rest of the Rs just dumb?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:

The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved

Again, House Resolution 503 called for Pelosi to nominate Republicans after consultation with the minority leader. “Consultation” doesn't mean “agreement” or “approval.” It just means Pelosi had to discuss it with McCarthy, which she did. And there are Republicans on the committee. Fewer than called for by the resolution, but the committee is also smaller than the resolution called for and the ratio of Democrats to Republicans is similar. Get a better argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:

The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved

Again, House Resolution 503 called for Pelosi to nominate Republicans after consultation with the minority leader. “Consultation” doesn't mean “agreement” or “approval.” It just means Pelosi had to discuss it with McCarthy, which she did. And there are Republicans on the committee. Fewer than called for by the resolution, but the committee is also smaller than the resolution called for and the ratio of Democrats to Republicans is similar. Get a better argument.

^PP is clearly grasping, as if ^PP is smarter than all of Rs in Congress combined.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are the serious people at DOJ?

Time to replace Garland with someone with the stones to do the job. He needs to retire from public service.

If you think the DOJ isn't working through this as efficiently and quickly as it can, I don't know what to tell you. Stop buying the "Garland isn't doing anything" BS - it undermines what is really happening, which is quite a lot, if you are paying attention.

Even Adam Schiff says Garland isn't taking action: "Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) says he wonders why the Department of Justice and Attorney General Merrick Garland haven't pursued an investigation into former President Donald Trump's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in a key state." CNN video:

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/11/28/adam-schiff-trump-merrick-garland-department-of-justice-sotu-sot-vpx.cnn

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:

The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved

LOL, no, they are within the rules. Stop listening to =right wing crap. They give you bad information and then you look stupid repeating it.

(hint, a few have tried to challenge on this argument in court and none of the judges have bought it)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:

The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved

LOL, no, they are within the rules. Stop listening to =right wing crap. They give you bad information and then you look stupid repeating it.

(hint, a few have tried to challenge on this argument in court and none of the judges have bought it)

Boy they must be afraid of what this commission is finding out. Desperate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:

The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved

sure, that's why McConnell is saying the committee should investigate.

Why haven't they raised this as an issue if it was real?

Are you smarter than all the Rs in Congress ? Or are the rest of the Rs just dumb?

I would ask the PP what the remedy he’s seeking would be? I mean since he’s a constitutional scholar and all. 🙄

And what fundamental rights are we talking about being abridged here? Just curious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

uh oh.. he's not toeing the R party line. How can the leader of the party in Congress want the commission to investigate but not condemn the Rs congress people who supported the insurrection. Lot of hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance going on there.

McConnell is all about power and if he’s saying this, it means he thinks what’s gonna come out soon will really hurt Rs. Plus, he really hates Ted Cruz.

[Anonymous]

He is part of the Gang of 8. He knows what is coming. Strap in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is part of the Gang of 8. He knows what is coming. Strap in.

Anyone who has paid attention knows what the GOP did. I sincerely doubt that anything shocking will be revealed. This just in: Republicans are traitors.

[Anonymous]