Harvard President resigns

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Could you imagine sitting on that Board now? The stupidity to hire Gay, then the arrogance to defend the decision….all now aired in the public. Can’t hide now. How blind they all must be. The irony.

Funny but this is all about Israel and jewish students upset that a few people felt comfortable criticized Israel. Those people must be made an example of!

That sounds like some people did something wrong.

Know you place, gentiles! The sacred cow is beyond any form of reproach, and if you so much as even hint at criticizing Israel, you'll be tarred and feathered with the anti-semitism slander faster than you can say "Wait, this is the meaning of shalom?" ...

DEI has Jews and Israel labeled as oppressors, actually in their own category separate from white people. It's not shocking that people would accuse you of anti-semitism especially with that added shalom jibe at the end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. There are many examples of genocide being suggested through signs and symbols. It's not clear that anyone is quoted as saying "let's go genocide all the Jews." So as someone who supports Gay's ouster, her comment that "context matters" is problematic. She wouldn't have said for example, "I don't know why the white supremacists were carrying tiki torches. Maybe they were headed to a luau." But she is defending this kind of behavior when Jews are the target. No Bueno. . .

Just did a very cursory DDG search on Harvard pro Palestinian protest; a few signs read:

“When people are occupied, resistance is justified”

“One solution, Revolution “

“From the River to the Sea”

“We stand with the Palestinian resistance “

“By any means necessary “

“Decolonization is not a metaphor “


Several of these campus slogans are direct calls for genocide (“from the river to the sea” - lifted directly from Hamas: a designated terrorist organization). Others are more subtle calls for violence.

All of these protests violate the standard, which is “hostile learning environment.”

While students must be free to express their views on public university grounds (and they SHOULD be allowed at privates like the Ivies), the slogans above clearly create a hostile learning environment for Jewish students.

The fact these Ivy presidents could not even express opposition to genocide of Jewish people is enough to justify their complete dismissal. In Gay’s case, she was not even docked pay; she was merely moved around among the Harvard elite.

If “from the river to the sea”, which is also in the formation documents of the governing party of Israel as a call for Israeli rule over the same territory (thus constituting a call for genocide of all Palestinians, by your logic), is legitimately objectionable on those shaky grounds, then the very existence of Zionism is also a call for genocide of all Palestinians, too, right?

So given that, why is there complete silence around the “hostile learning environment” created by every student, faculty member and staff at these institutions who supports Zionism in any way, shape, or form?

The stated, immutable aim of Zionism is indivisible Jewish dominion (by an immigrant population) over the region through forced displacement (removal or death as acceptable means) of the indigenous population.

Zionism = Genocide, yet we seemingly cannot tackle that one

I don't understand your logic. You are allowed to be Muslim in Israel. The reverse isn't true. Hamas explicitly calls for genocide. Israel doesn't. In fact, they have tried repeatedly to get Muslim nations to take in the Palestinian "refugees." Israel also pays for all of Palestine's every and water. If they wanted to commit genocide, it'd be easy. They would just turn off the water.

Let talk about your logic. Jews create Israel out of nothing in the holy site of three religions, expel Muslim from Israel because they are not Jewish, steal their property and now it is the responsibility of other nations to take them in?

No. War crimes are not the fault of victims and others do not need to take care of the dead bodies piled up by the perpetrators of the crime. By your logic nazi German was within it rights.

You are ill informed. Jews did not create Israel, the UN did.

More like the British Empire and Christian countries did, ignoring the will of the Muslim world.

In other words…the UN.

How do even look yourself in the mirror when one side of your mouth incessantly bashes every position the U.N. Has taken for the past 75 years, while the other side trumpets the U.N. partition action (which if you were honest, you would at least acknowledge Israel’s Zionist founders forced by committing terrorist acts that drove the partition decision)?

Pretty easy, since I’m not Israel, Israeli or Jewish.

Pretty damn funny you jumped to that conclusion, though.

Says something about you, doesn’t it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

Are you a major donor? A current Harvard student? A former student? If not, STFU. You act like you own Harvard or something. You think you should be making hiring/firing decisions for Harvard or anywhere else that you don’t have a personal connection to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Could you imagine sitting on that Board now? The stupidity to hire Gay, then the arrogance to defend the decision….all now aired in the public. Can’t hide now. How blind they all must be. The irony.

Funny but this is all about Israel and jewish students upset that a few people felt comfortable criticized Israel. Those people must be made an example of!

That sounds like some people did something wrong.

Know you place, gentiles! The sacred cow is beyond any form of reproach, and if you so much as even hint at criticizing Israel, you'll be tarred and feathered with the anti-semitism slander faster than you can say "Wait, this is the meaning of shalom?" ...

DEI has Jews and Israel labeled as oppressors, actually in their own category separate from white people. It's not shocking that people would accuse you of anti-semitism especially with that added shalom jibe at the end.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

Are you a major donor? A current Harvard student? A former student? If not, STFU. You act like you own Harvard or something. You think you should be making hiring/firing decisions for Harvard or anywhere else that you don’t have a personal connection to?

As taxpayers, we can all express our opinions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

Are you a major donor? A current Harvard student? A former student? If not, STFU. You act like you own Harvard or something. You think you should be making hiring/firing decisions for Harvard or anywhere else that you don’t have a personal connection to?

Wait. Do you actually believe DCUM posters have hiring / firing power for Harvard? Dang. You Gay defenders are insane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

Are you a major donor? A current Harvard student? A former student? If not, STFU. You act like you own Harvard or something. You think you should be making hiring/firing decisions for Harvard or anywhere else that you don’t have a personal connection to?

Wait. Do you actually believe DCUM posters have hiring / firing power for Harvard? Dang. You Gay defenders are insane.

No, dumbass, I’m responding to the PP who wrote “I want her azzz gone” re: Gay. I am not a Gay supporter. But I also thinks it’s absurd that some people on this thread think that because they’re “taxpayers,” they have a say in firing the president of a university.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

Are you a major donor? A current Harvard student? A former student? If not, STFU. You act like you own Harvard or something. You think you should be making hiring/firing decisions for Harvard or anywhere else that you don’t have a personal connection to?

Wait. Do you actually believe DCUM posters have hiring / firing power for Harvard? Dang. You Gay defenders are insane.

No, dumbass, I’m responding to the PP who wrote “I want her azzz gone” re: Gay. I am not a Gay supporter. But I also thinks it’s absurd that some people on this thread think that because they’re “taxpayers,” they have a say in firing the president of a university.

Why on earth do you think that PP thinks she has a say in firing the president of a university? You are delusional. Crazy stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

Are you a major donor? A current Harvard student? A former student? If not, STFU. You act like you own Harvard or something. You think you should be making hiring/firing decisions for Harvard or anywhere else that you don’t have a personal connection to?

Wait. Do you actually believe DCUM posters have hiring / firing power for Harvard? Dang. You Gay defenders are insane.

No, dumbass, I’m responding to the PP who wrote “I want her azzz gone” re: Gay. I am not a Gay supporter. But I also thinks it’s absurd that some people on this thread think that because they’re “taxpayers,” they have a say in firing the president of a university.

$600 million went to Harvard last year. What was the source of those millions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

Are you a major donor? A current Harvard student? A former student? If not, STFU. You act like you own Harvard or something. You think you should be making hiring/firing decisions for Harvard or anywhere else that you don’t have a personal connection to?

Oh but we’re having too much fun to quit now. Two down, one to go. And then we start taking back the rest of academia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:well of course it was the "right-wingers" who scrutinized her past academic work for plagiarism.
I mean, who else is going to it it, the left wingers,
And just because they're right wingers doesn't mean they are wrong. I mean you can see the passages side-by-side and see she plagiarized.
And how incredible it was in her resignation letter to argue she has upheld "academic rigor" at Harvard.

Left wingers did review her work during peer-review but they ignored the plagiarism and decided to lower standards so she could lead Harvard. Gay didn't even attempt to defend her scholarship against their mild charges of plagiarism, she knew she was going to move up regardless.

It's also that Gay has published only 11 "scholarly" articles (several of which were plagiarized). This is a glaringly small number for a tenured professor. The Harvard provost who is now serving as interim university president has published over 10 times that number.

I'd be surprised if recently departed Purdue president, Mitch Daniels had published even one scholarly article.

Harvard used to be in a class far beyond Purdue where any comparison would be ridiculous. Yes, people want to see a legitimately incredible person lead an organization like Harvard. Now Harvard seems like a place rich liberal people send their children for foolish indoctrination and is comparable to Liberty.

This.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

Are you a major donor? A current Harvard student? A former student? If not, STFU. You act like you own Harvard or something. You think you should be making hiring/firing decisions for Harvard or anywhere else that you don’t have a personal connection to?

Oh but we’re having too much fun to quit now. Two down, one to go. And then we start taking back the rest of academia.

Maniacal laugh follows…you are so dramatic, PP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

Nope. I want her azzzzz gone.

Are you a major donor? A current Harvard student? A former student? If not, STFU. You act like you own Harvard or something. You think you should be making hiring/firing decisions for Harvard or anywhere else that you don’t have a personal connection to?

Wait. Do you actually believe DCUM posters have hiring / firing power for Harvard? Dang. You Gay defenders are insane.

No, dumbass, I’m responding to the PP who wrote “I want her azzz gone” re: Gay. I am not a Gay supporter. But I also thinks it’s absurd that some people on this thread think that because they’re “taxpayers,” they have a say in firing the president of a university.

I agree 100%. If you aren't a corporate employee or using their services and products, you shouldn't be allowed to voice your opinion about that company.

[Anonymous]

Play stupid games….win stupid prizes

Don’t use merit as the reason to hire someone, you lose every time. Sometimes the loss comes quickly; other times it takes a little time, but it eventually arrives.

Those of us who own/operate a business know this. Thank god I don’t have to deal w a Board full of all these “intellectuals”.