Harvard President resigns

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. There are many examples of genocide being suggested through signs and symbols. It's not clear that anyone is quoted as saying "let's go genocide all the Jews." So as someone who supports Gay's ouster, her comment that "context matters" is problematic. She wouldn't have said for example, "I don't know why the white supremacists were carrying tiki torches. Maybe they were headed to a luau." But she is defending this kind of behavior when Jews are the target. No Bueno. . .

Just did a very cursory DDG search on Harvard pro Palestinian protest; a few signs read:

“When people are occupied, resistance is justified”

“One solution, Revolution “

“From the River to the Sea”

“We stand with the Palestinian resistance “

“By any means necessary “

“Decolonization is not a metaphor “


Several of these campus slogans are direct calls for genocide (“from the river to the sea” - lifted directly from Hamas: a designated terrorist organization). Others are more subtle calls for violence.

All of these protests violate the standard, which is “hostile learning environment.”

While students must be free to express their views on public university grounds (and they SHOULD be allowed at privates like the Ivies), the slogans above clearly create a hostile learning environment for Jewish students.

The fact these Ivy presidents could not even express opposition to genocide of Jewish people is enough to justify their complete dismissal. In Gay’s case, she was not even docked pay; she was merely moved around among the Harvard elite.

If “from the river to the sea”, which is also in the formation documents of the governing party of Israel as a call for Israeli rule over the same territory (thus constituting a call for genocide of all Palestinians, by your logic), is legitimately objectionable on those shaky grounds, then the very existence of Zionism is also a call for genocide of all Palestinians, too, right?

So given that, why is there complete silence around the “hostile learning environment” created by every student, faculty member and staff at these institutions who supports Zionism in any way, shape, or form?

The stated, immutable aim of Zionism is indivisible Jewish dominion (by an immigrant population) over the region through forced displacement (removal or death as acceptable means) of the indigenous population.

Zionism = Genocide, yet we seemingly cannot tackle that one

I don't understand your logic. You are allowed to be Muslim in Israel. The reverse isn't true. Hamas explicitly calls for genocide. Israel doesn't. In fact, they have tried repeatedly to get Muslim nations to take in the Palestinian "refugees." Israel also pays for all of Palestine's every and water. If they wanted to commit genocide, it'd be easy. They would just turn off the water.

Let talk about your logic. Jews create Israel out of nothing in the holy site of three religions, expel Muslim from Israel because they are not Jewish, steal their property and now it is the responsibility of other nations to take them in?

No. War crimes are not the fault of victims and others do not need to take care of the dead bodies piled up by the perpetrators of the crime. By your logic nazi German was within it rights.

You are ill informed. Jews did not create Israel, the UN did.

More like the British Empire and Christian countries did, ignoring the will of the Muslim world.

In other words…the UN.

How do even look yourself in the mirror when one side of your mouth incessantly bashes every position the U.N. Has taken for the past 75 years, while the other side trumpets the U.N. partition action (which if you were honest, you would at least acknowledge Israel’s Zionist founders forced by committing terrorist acts that drove the partition decision)?

[Anonymous]

The examples I have seen of her alleged plagiarism seem to involve pretty technical writing, though. If you are describing, a bivariate distribution and methods used to derive results from that distribution, there are only so many ways. If a particular fact or event has often been cited by scholars, how many ways are there to say it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The examples I have seen of her alleged plagiarism seem to involve pretty technical writing, though. If you are describing, a bivariate distribution and methods used to derive results from that distribution, there are only so many ways. If a particular fact or event has often been cited by scholars, how many ways are there to say it?

Oxman didn’t cite where citation is required. Are you seriously going to feebly try to wipe the spittle from your chin in defending this plagiarism?

She’s a fraud. Ackman is a fraud. And anyone that defends either after Avkman’s tantrums of the last three months is likewise A TOTAL FRAUD.

This is Karma. Wake TF up and open your eyes to the fact that the days of playing this hypocrisy game are over. You WILL be dragged through the mud if you’re found out to be throwing stones from your glass house.

[Anonymous]

She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

The Board will save itself by picking a solid replacement for Gay and then say problem fixed, nothing to see here, and the Press will move along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Students were expelled from Harvard for plagiarism. She OTOH continues on there as a professor at 900K a year.

Again with the 900K. Would you be less annoyed if it was, say, 400K?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Could you imagine sitting on that Board now? The stupidity to hire Gay, then the arrogance to defend the decision….all now aired in the public. Can’t hide now. How blind they all must be. The irony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. There are many examples of genocide being suggested through signs and symbols. It's not clear that anyone is quoted as saying "let's go genocide all the Jews." So as someone who supports Gay's ouster, her comment that "context matters" is problematic. She wouldn't have said for example, "I don't know why the white supremacists were carrying tiki torches. Maybe they were headed to a luau." But she is defending this kind of behavior when Jews are the target. No Bueno. . .

Just did a very cursory DDG search on Harvard pro Palestinian protest; a few signs read:

“When people are occupied, resistance is justified”

“One solution, Revolution “

“From the River to the Sea”

“We stand with the Palestinian resistance “

“By any means necessary “

“Decolonization is not a metaphor “


Several of these campus slogans are direct calls for genocide (“from the river to the sea” - lifted directly from Hamas: a designated terrorist organization). Others are more subtle calls for violence.

All of these protests violate the standard, which is “hostile learning environment.”

While students must be free to express their views on public university grounds (and they SHOULD be allowed at privates like the Ivies), the slogans above clearly create a hostile learning environment for Jewish students.

The fact these Ivy presidents could not even express opposition to genocide of Jewish people is enough to justify their complete dismissal. In Gay’s case, she was not even docked pay; she was merely moved around among the Harvard elite.

If “from the river to the sea”, which is also in the formation documents of the governing party of Israel as a call for Israeli rule over the same territory (thus constituting a call for genocide of all Palestinians, by your logic), is legitimately objectionable on those shaky grounds, then the very existence of Zionism is also a call for genocide of all Palestinians, too, right?

So given that, why is there complete silence around the “hostile learning environment” created by every student, faculty member and staff at these institutions who supports Zionism in any way, shape, or form?

The stated, immutable aim of Zionism is indivisible Jewish dominion (by an immigrant population) over the region through forced displacement (removal or death as acceptable means) of the indigenous population.

Zionism = Genocide, yet we seemingly cannot tackle that one

I don't understand your logic. You are allowed to be Muslim in Israel. The reverse isn't true. Hamas explicitly calls for genocide. Israel doesn't. In fact, they have tried repeatedly to get Muslim nations to take in the Palestinian "refugees." Israel also pays for all of Palestine's every and water. If they wanted to commit genocide, it'd be easy. They would just turn off the water.

Let talk about your logic. Jews create Israel out of nothing in the holy site of three religions, expel Muslim from Israel because they are not Jewish, steal their property and now it is the responsibility of other nations to take them in?

No. War crimes are not the fault of victims and others do not need to take care of the dead bodies piled up by the perpetrators of the crime. By your logic nazi German was within it rights.

They were sold the land and at the time, "Palestinians" were Bedouins, not homesteaders on the land. No one is trying to kill Palestinians on a regular basis. Palestinians, however, vote for and support Hamas. I don't expect Jews to turn the other cheek on a neighboring nation that wants to destroy them. They are well within their rights-- and responsibilities-- to rain down on Palestine until Palestinians pledge to stop. And, fascinating that you'd invoke Nazism. We both know you're the side very sympathetic to their goals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Could you imagine sitting on that Board now? The stupidity to hire Gay, then the arrogance to defend the decision….all now aired in the public. Can’t hide now. How blind they all must be. The irony.

Funny but this is all about Israel and jewish students upset that a few people felt comfortable criticized Israel. Those people must be made an example of!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Could you imagine sitting on that Board now? The stupidity to hire Gay, then the arrogance to defend the decision….all now aired in the public. Can’t hide now. How blind they all must be. The irony.

Funny but this is all about Israel and jewish students upset that a few people felt comfortable criticized Israel. Those people must be made an example of!

Wrong again. This is about elite universities and organizations embracing DEI nonsense and the resulting decline from those policies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Could you imagine sitting on that Board now? The stupidity to hire Gay, then the arrogance to defend the decision….all now aired in the public. Can’t hide now. How blind they all must be. The irony.

Funny but this is all about Israel and jewish students upset that a few people felt comfortable criticized Israel. Those people must be made an example of!

Wrong again. This is about elite universities and organizations embracing DEI nonsense and the resulting decline from those policies. [/quote)

It started as one thing, and morphed to the other. Couldn’t be happier that taking down DEI and exposing frauds in academics is the end result.

DEI hires in any fields area joke, hurt actual minorities that are qualified, and hurts businesses everyday. Time to go!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Could you imagine sitting on that Board now? The stupidity to hire Gay, then the arrogance to defend the decision….all now aired in the public. Can’t hide now. How blind they all must be. The irony.

Funny but this is all about Israel and jewish students upset that a few people felt comfortable criticized Israel. Those people must be made an example of!

That sounds like some people did something wrong.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a fraud. Pretty simple imo. Had to go. The Board needs to go too. Those dummies hired her, then defended her, at the detriment of the very institution they were charged w leading. Double whammy for 5he Board. Idiots.

And any other presidents who have this much trash in their research, they can go too.

Could you imagine sitting on that Board now? The stupidity to hire Gay, then the arrogance to defend the decision….all now aired in the public. Can’t hide now. How blind they all must be. The irony.

Funny but this is all about Israel and jewish students upset that a few people felt comfortable criticized Israel. Those people must be made an example of!

That sounds like some people did something wrong.

Know you place, gentiles! The sacred cow is beyond any form of reproach, and if you so much as even hint at criticizing Israel, you'll be tarred and feathered with the anti-semitism slander faster than you can say "Wait, this is the meaning of shalom?" ...