Woman missing after reporting seeing a toddler on the highway

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is the latest on this? She still saying pennywise got her in the back of an 18 wheeler with cheezits still?

Good thing she was eating Cheez-its instead of Cheetos. That orange stuff would be all over her new nail polish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She seems kind of, intense?

https://ibb.co/fSyxBrq

I like her more now 🤔

What 🤷‍♀️ That shit was funny

Definitely written by the kind of "intense" person who would want to give her BF a lesson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is horrible. I'm presenting some facts to contrast the wild, unsubstantiated judgment.

So many of you think the police would immediately tell the public about an abduction. Wrong.

Here's a case in CA, where the police didn't believe Denise Huskins was abducted because she returned 48 hours with a suitcase. They thought it was a hoax because she "didn't act like a kidnapping victim." Well, the FBI got on the case and arrested a Harvard-trained lawyer who abducted Huskins and demanded less than $10K ransom. The nasty speculation and rumors forced them to move. The police didn't warn the public about a real threat. https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-vallejo-police-hoax-denise-huskins-20160801-snap-story.html

It's dangerous at worst, laughable at best if you think the police, companies, the church, or even journalists will release timely information to protect the public or private constituencies. We know from the movie "Spotlight" that the Boston Globe sat on information that would alert the public that priests were molesting children, until they felt they had a "stronger" case. We know from #metoo that companies have routinely swept cases of rape and harassment under the rug. Heck, if you're over 10 years old, you will be lucky if your missing persons case is taken seriously or even investigated, so what makes you think they're out there in a rush to warn the public: https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2023/03/02/missing-children-kids-police-attention-depends-on-age-location/11219534002/

Red Roof Inn has been hit with lawsuits for aiding and abetting traffickers and profiting from it in many states. So, the hotel did or didn't do something based on its own interests. If you Google it you will read horrifying details and them turning a blind eye (i.e. proving my earlier point about companies not protecting the public or its guests).
GA: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/more-dozen-victims-trafficked-metro-212310723.html
OH: https://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/red-roof-inn-staff-complicit-in-sex-trafficking-lawsuit-alleges-columbus-attorney-steven-babin-new-albany-based-company-central-ohio
WA (can't find this reported in news outlets): https://www.law360.com/real-estate-authority/commercial/articles/1678370/seattle-red-roof-inn-hit-with-sex-trafficking-survivor-suit
MD (actual arrests): https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/2-charged-with-human-trafficking-at-jessup-red-roof-inn/

Twitter reports 64,000 Black women remain missing. Here's an NPR report on how Black women disproportionately go missing. https://www.npr.org/2021/09/24/1040048967/missing-black-women-girls-left-out-media-ignored

No matter what happened to Carlee, publicizing all missing women (and children, per above) cases can greatly influence their outcome of being found and helping the police. We know that Black women are often ignored.

Yes, but how many of the specific cases you cite have video capture of the disappearance, as well as a police statement that they have pieced together every footstep the person made prior to that?

So different.

You have no idea. In the Huskins case they had an eye-witness--her boyfriend. It didn't seem to matter at all.

I think you misunderstand. Regardless, a camera and videotape is not the same as a person's account.

Grainy camera footage doesn't tell the entire story. You missed my post just upthread that might fill in some gaps for you:

One more about people thinking everyone would, no doubtedly!, see something on the side of a busy highway. In another inattentional blindness study, 83% of radiologists failed to spot an angry gorilla that had been placed on their slide. As mentioned in the article, these are people trained to detect inconsistencies.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/02/...-gorilla-hiding-in-plain-sight

I don't think you know what "inattentional" means, and that is leading you to misinterpret the study.

A computer-enhanced length of video footage being poured over by investigators in a search that has national attention is not the same as a radiology slide being read as one of hundreds by some contract worker in California.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Still not sure what to make of this additional bizarre detail?

https://imgur.com/a/XAxVjsU

If this was on Netflix you'd turn it off bc none of it adds up.

I read that it had something to do with a minor traffic ticket, so maybe at traffic court or something similar.

but the "we were able to tell her how much we thought of her" would be strange in that context, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If she was targeted maybe her posts drew attention, they were clearly attention seeking. It's not really what you would expect someone to post under their own name as they headed off to nursing school, is it?

Which ones? I agree on the posts making disparaging and aggressive remarks about another woman.
The posts of her in a bathing suit are fine. She's attractive and young and enjoying it. What is wrong with that?

NP here. Nothing is *wrong* with it. That won't change the fact that certain people, mainly men, are visually-stimulated sexual predators. At the very least, you can be assured that she's made it into the web databases of men who excitedly geo-locate attractive women. Each woman has her own page with location details and and stockpile of her images. They also ask who has nudes of said women and trade them and add them to her profile. Happens 24/7.

I'm also a NP and while I agree with you, how would this fit in here? A stalker knew she'd be traveling on the interstate at that very moment, and happened to have a toddler with him, knowing that she - and only she, out of all the interstate travelers that evening - would pull over???

An interesting theory that I read was that she wasn’t the one in the car on the highway. The perp left the vehicle on the side of the road. Perhaps she was kidnapped before and the rest (the phone calls she made) were a part of throwing people off.

That would make more sense. LE needs to cross reference the time stamp of the traffic cam to her 911 call. In the theory you read, how do they account for the 911 call? Because she did say she was on the interstate, right by that mile marker. So the kidnapper forced her to make that call, from a separate location, and then at the same time, an accomplice was driving her car on the interstate to coincide with the 911 call?? That’s quite… complicated for two random assailants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If she was targeted maybe her posts drew attention, they were clearly attention seeking. It's not really what you would expect someone to post under their own name as they headed off to nursing school, is it?

Which ones? I agree on the posts making disparaging and aggressive remarks about another woman.
The posts of her in a bathing suit are fine. She's attractive and young and enjoying it. What is wrong with that?

NP here. Nothing is *wrong* with it. That won't change the fact that certain people, mainly men, are visually-stimulated sexual predators. At the very least, you can be assured that she's made it into the web databases of men who excitedly geo-locate attractive women. Each woman has her own page with location details and and stockpile of her images. They also ask who has nudes of said women and trade them and add them to her profile. Happens 24/7.

I'm also a NP and while I agree with you, how would this fit in here? A stalker knew she'd be traveling on the interstate at that very moment, and happened to have a toddler with him, knowing that she - and only she, out of all the interstate travelers that evening - would pull over???

An interesting theory that I read was that she wasn’t the one in the car on the highway. The perp left the vehicle on the side of the road. Perhaps she was kidnapped before and the rest (the phone calls she made) were a part of throwing people off.

That would make more sense. LE needs to cross reference the time stamp of the traffic cam to her 911 call. In the theory you read, how do they account for the 911 call? Because she did say she was on the interstate, right by that mile marker. So the kidnapper forced her to make that call, from a separate location, and then at the same time, an accomplice was driving her car on the interstate to coincide with the 911 call?? That’s quite… complicated for two random assailants.

Yet another theory that makes exactly zero sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is horrible. I'm presenting some facts to contrast the wild, unsubstantiated judgment.

So many of you think the police would immediately tell the public about an abduction. Wrong.

Here's a case in CA, where the police didn't believe Denise Huskins was abducted because she returned 48 hours with a suitcase. They thought it was a hoax because she "didn't act like a kidnapping victim." Well, the FBI got on the case and arrested a Harvard-trained lawyer who abducted Huskins and demanded less than $10K ransom. The nasty speculation and rumors forced them to move. The police didn't warn the public about a real threat. https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-vallejo-police-hoax-denise-huskins-20160801-snap-story.html

It's dangerous at worst, laughable at best if you think the police, companies, the church, or even journalists will release timely information to protect the public or private constituencies. We know from the movie "Spotlight" that the Boston Globe sat on information that would alert the public that priests were molesting children, until they felt they had a "stronger" case. We know from #metoo that companies have routinely swept cases of rape and harassment under the rug. Heck, if you're over 10 years old, you will be lucky if your missing persons case is taken seriously or even investigated, so what makes you think they're out there in a rush to warn the public: https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2023/03/02/missing-children-kids-police-attention-depends-on-age-location/11219534002/

Red Roof Inn has been hit with lawsuits for aiding and abetting traffickers and profiting from it in many states. So, the hotel did or didn't do something based on its own interests. If you Google it you will read horrifying details and them turning a blind eye (i.e. proving my earlier point about companies not protecting the public or its guests).
GA: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/more-dozen-victims-trafficked-metro-212310723.html
OH: https://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/red-roof-inn-staff-complicit-in-sex-trafficking-lawsuit-alleges-columbus-attorney-steven-babin-new-albany-based-company-central-ohio
WA (can't find this reported in news outlets): https://www.law360.com/real-estate-authority/commercial/articles/1678370/seattle-red-roof-inn-hit-with-sex-trafficking-survivor-suit
MD (actual arrests): https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/2-charged-with-human-trafficking-at-jessup-red-roof-inn/

Twitter reports 64,000 Black women remain missing. Here's an NPR report on how Black women disproportionately go missing. https://www.npr.org/2021/09/24/1040048967/missing-black-women-girls-left-out-media-ignored

No matter what happened to Carlee, publicizing all missing women (and children, per above) cases can greatly influence their outcome of being found and helping the police. We know that Black women are often ignored.

Yes, but how many of the specific cases you cite have video capture of the disappearance, as well as a police statement that they have pieced together every footstep the person made prior to that?

So different.

You have no idea. In the Huskins case they had an eye-witness--her boyfriend. It didn't seem to matter at all.

I think you misunderstand. Regardless, a camera and videotape is not the same as a person's account.

Grainy camera footage doesn't tell the entire story. You missed my post just upthread that might fill in some gaps for you:

One more about people thinking everyone would, no doubtedly!, see something on the side of a busy highway. In another inattentional blindness study, 83% of radiologists failed to spot an angry gorilla that had been placed on their slide. As mentioned in the article, these are people trained to detect inconsistencies.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/02/...-gorilla-hiding-in-plain-sight

I don't think you know what "inattentional" means, and that is leading you to misinterpret the study.

A computer-enhanced length of video footage being poured over by investigators in a search that has national attention is not the same as a radiology slide being read as one of hundreds by some contract worker in California.

I definitely know what it means. How do you know the footage is being "poured over by investigators"? You assume because internet sleuths are poring over it, obsessively stating what they do and don't see.

People have biases, expectations, and inattention that allow them to miss things, often in plain sight. That grainy video doesn't show much. Even the enhanced video doesn't show much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is horrible. I'm presenting some facts to contrast the wild, unsubstantiated judgment.

So many of you think the police would immediately tell the public about an abduction. Wrong.

Here's a case in CA, where the police didn't believe Denise Huskins was abducted because she returned 48 hours with a suitcase. They thought it was a hoax because she "didn't act like a kidnapping victim." Well, the FBI got on the case and arrested a Harvard-trained lawyer who abducted Huskins and demanded less than $10K ransom. The nasty speculation and rumors forced them to move. The police didn't warn the public about a real threat. https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-vallejo-police-hoax-denise-huskins-20160801-snap-story.html

It's dangerous at worst, laughable at best if you think the police, companies, the church, or even journalists will release timely information to protect the public or private constituencies. We know from the movie "Spotlight" that the Boston Globe sat on information that would alert the public that priests were molesting children, until they felt they had a "stronger" case. We know from #metoo that companies have routinely swept cases of rape and harassment under the rug. Heck, if you're over 10 years old, you will be lucky if your missing persons case is taken seriously or even investigated, so what makes you think they're out there in a rush to warn the public: https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2023/03/02/missing-children-kids-police-attention-depends-on-age-location/11219534002/

Red Roof Inn has been hit with lawsuits for aiding and abetting traffickers and profiting from it in many states. So, the hotel did or didn't do something based on its own interests. If you Google it you will read horrifying details and them turning a blind eye (i.e. proving my earlier point about companies not protecting the public or its guests).
GA: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/more-dozen-victims-trafficked-metro-212310723.html
OH: https://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/red-roof-inn-staff-complicit-in-sex-trafficking-lawsuit-alleges-columbus-attorney-steven-babin-new-albany-based-company-central-ohio
WA (can't find this reported in news outlets): https://www.law360.com/real-estate-authority/commercial/articles/1678370/seattle-red-roof-inn-hit-with-sex-trafficking-survivor-suit
MD (actual arrests): https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/2-charged-with-human-trafficking-at-jessup-red-roof-inn/

Twitter reports 64,000 Black women remain missing. Here's an NPR report on how Black women disproportionately go missing. https://www.npr.org/2021/09/24/1040048967/missing-black-women-girls-left-out-media-ignored

No matter what happened to Carlee, publicizing all missing women (and children, per above) cases can greatly influence their outcome of being found and helping the police. We know that Black women are often ignored.

Yes, but how many of the specific cases you cite have video capture of the disappearance, as well as a police statement that they have pieced together every footstep the person made prior to that?

So different.

You have no idea. In the Huskins case they had an eye-witness--her boyfriend. It didn't seem to matter at all.

I think you misunderstand. Regardless, a camera and videotape is not the same as a person's account.

Grainy camera footage doesn't tell the entire story. You missed my post just upthread that might fill in some gaps for you:

One more about people thinking everyone would, no doubtedly!, see something on the side of a busy highway. In another inattentional blindness study, 83% of radiologists failed to spot an angry gorilla that had been placed on their slide. As mentioned in the article, these are people trained to detect inconsistencies.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/02/...-gorilla-hiding-in-plain-sight

I don't think you know what "inattentional" means, and that is leading you to misinterpret the study.

A computer-enhanced length of video footage being poured over by investigators in a search that has national attention is not the same as a radiology slide being read as one of hundreds by some contract worker in California.

Clearly PP wasn't talking about the police having inattentional blindness. S/he was talking about other drivers not paying attention to what is going on on the side of the road.

The video was too grainy to see much of anything.

[Anonymous]

Planned hoax for some personal reason or bad drugs/hallucination/freak out are the 2 most likely theories to me at this point.

She seems very dramatic and prone to extremes so either could fit.

That the family did not call LE before going to RRI or when she returned home suggests to me that they did not see the situation as a LE one at that point and where trying to address it themselves or buy time to frame the facts. The family was not acting concerned about a missing toddler or out of a zeal to catch abductors. They were acting like they were trying to shield her from LE consequences and mitigate her mess. YMMV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is the latest on this? She still saying pennywise got her in the back of an 18 wheeler with cheezits still?

The latest is a truck driving red head with a receding hairline abducted her and held her in a tractor trailer for two days feeding her Cheez-its. That is what she says happened. And her boyfriend says she barely escaped with her life.

But; other people are saying that red headed guy also must have let her free to go to a party where other people saw her. No red headed trucker was mentioned. He may have been wearing a hat though. Or hiding in the woods. And at some point, somebody painted her nails

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She seems kind of, intense?

https://ibb.co/fSyxBrq

I like her more now 🤔

What 🤷‍♀️ That shit was funny

Definitely written by the kind of "intense" person who would want to give her BF a lesson.

Yikes. Definitely an immature 25 year old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If she was targeted maybe her posts drew attention, they were clearly attention seeking. It's not really what you would expect someone to post under their own name as they headed off to nursing school, is it?

Which ones? I agree on the posts making disparaging and aggressive remarks about another woman.
The posts of her in a bathing suit are fine. She's attractive and young and enjoying it. What is wrong with that?

NP here. Nothing is *wrong* with it. That won't change the fact that certain people, mainly men, are visually-stimulated sexual predators. At the very least, you can be assured that she's made it into the web databases of men who excitedly geo-locate attractive women. Each woman has her own page with location details and and stockpile of her images. They also ask who has nudes of said women and trade them and add them to her profile. Happens 24/7.

I'm also a NP and while I agree with you, how would this fit in here? A stalker knew she'd be traveling on the interstate at that very moment, and happened to have a toddler with him, knowing that she - and only she, out of all the interstate travelers that evening - would pull over???

An interesting theory that I read was that she wasn’t the one in the car on the highway. The perp left the vehicle on the side of the road. Perhaps she was kidnapped before and the rest (the phone calls she made) were a part of throwing people off.

That would make more sense. LE needs to cross reference the time stamp of the traffic cam to her 911 call. In the theory you read, how do they account for the 911 call? Because she did say she was on the interstate, right by that mile marker. So the kidnapper forced her to make that call, from a separate location, and then at the same time, an accomplice was driving her car on the interstate to coincide with the 911 call?? That’s quite… complicated for two random assailants.

Yet another theory that makes exactly zero sense.

Yeah. That theory won’t work. Her family said that she was talking to them with the interstate noise in the background. She screamed, and then they continued to hear the interstate noise in the background. So she was by the interstate. Maybe she wasn’t alone, or she wasn’t driving, but she was there.

And if she wasn’t alone, (1) why would her assailants force her to call her family and (2) why wouldn’t she tell her family she was being kidnapped and give them a description of the person(s)? I don’t think this theory can work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is horrible. I'm presenting some facts to contrast the wild, unsubstantiated judgment.

So many of you think the police would immediately tell the public about an abduction. Wrong.

Here's a case in CA, where the police didn't believe Denise Huskins was abducted because she returned 48 hours with a suitcase. They thought it was a hoax because she "didn't act like a kidnapping victim." Well, the FBI got on the case and arrested a Harvard-trained lawyer who abducted Huskins and demanded less than $10K ransom. The nasty speculation and rumors forced them to move. The police didn't warn the public about a real threat. https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-vallejo-police-hoax-denise-huskins-20160801-snap-story.html

It's dangerous at worst, laughable at best if you think the police, companies, the church, or even journalists will release timely information to protect the public or private constituencies. We know from the movie "Spotlight" that the Boston Globe sat on information that would alert the public that priests were molesting children, until they felt they had a "stronger" case. We know from #metoo that companies have routinely swept cases of rape and harassment under the rug. Heck, if you're over 10 years old, you will be lucky if your missing persons case is taken seriously or even investigated, so what makes you think they're out there in a rush to warn the public: https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2023/03/02/missing-children-kids-police-attention-depends-on-age-location/11219534002/

Red Roof Inn has been hit with lawsuits for aiding and abetting traffickers and profiting from it in many states. So, the hotel did or didn't do something based on its own interests. If you Google it you will read horrifying details and them turning a blind eye (i.e. proving my earlier point about companies not protecting the public or its guests).
GA: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/more-dozen-victims-trafficked-metro-212310723.html
OH: https://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/red-roof-inn-staff-complicit-in-sex-trafficking-lawsuit-alleges-columbus-attorney-steven-babin-new-albany-based-company-central-ohio
WA (can't find this reported in news outlets): https://www.law360.com/real-estate-authority/commercial/articles/1678370/seattle-red-roof-inn-hit-with-sex-trafficking-survivor-suit
MD (actual arrests): https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/2-charged-with-human-trafficking-at-jessup-red-roof-inn/

Twitter reports 64,000 Black women remain missing. Here's an NPR report on how Black women disproportionately go missing. https://www.npr.org/2021/09/24/1040048967/missing-black-women-girls-left-out-media-ignored

No matter what happened to Carlee, publicizing all missing women (and children, per above) cases can greatly influence their outcome of being found and helping the police. We know that Black women are often ignored.

Yes, but how many of the specific cases you cite have video capture of the disappearance, as well as a police statement that they have pieced together every footstep the person made prior to that?

So different.

You have no idea. In the Huskins case they had an eye-witness--her boyfriend. It didn't seem to matter at all.

I think you misunderstand. Regardless, a camera and videotape is not the same as a person's account.

Grainy camera footage doesn't tell the entire story. You missed my post just upthread that might fill in some gaps for you:

One more about people thinking everyone would, no doubtedly!, see something on the side of a busy highway. In another inattentional blindness study, 83% of radiologists failed to spot an angry gorilla that had been placed on their slide. As mentioned in the article, these are people trained to detect inconsistencies.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/02/...-gorilla-hiding-in-plain-sight

I don't think you know what "inattentional" means, and that is leading you to misinterpret the study.

A computer-enhanced length of video footage being poured over by investigators in a search that has national attention is not the same as a radiology slide being read as one of hundreds by some contract worker in California.

Clearly PP wasn't talking about the police having inattentional blindness. S/he was talking about other drivers not paying attention to what is going on on the side of the road.

The video was too grainy to see much of anything.

There are pretty clear versions floating around. No other human, adult or child in video and no other cars or vehicles pulled over nearby. Make of that what you will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is horrible. I'm presenting some facts to contrast the wild, unsubstantiated judgment.

So many of you think the police would immediately tell the public about an abduction. Wrong.

Here's a case in CA, where the police didn't believe Denise Huskins was abducted because she returned 48 hours with a suitcase. They thought it was a hoax because she "didn't act like a kidnapping victim." Well, the FBI got on the case and arrested a Harvard-trained lawyer who abducted Huskins and demanded less than $10K ransom. The nasty speculation and rumors forced them to move. The police didn't warn the public about a real threat. https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-vallejo-police-hoax-denise-huskins-20160801-snap-story.html

It's dangerous at worst, laughable at best if you think the police, companies, the church, or even journalists will release timely information to protect the public or private constituencies. We know from the movie "Spotlight" that the Boston Globe sat on information that would alert the public that priests were molesting children, until they felt they had a "stronger" case. We know from #metoo that companies have routinely swept cases of rape and harassment under the rug. Heck, if you're over 10 years old, you will be lucky if your missing persons case is taken seriously or even investigated, so what makes you think they're out there in a rush to warn the public: https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2023/03/02/missing-children-kids-police-attention-depends-on-age-location/11219534002/

Red Roof Inn has been hit with lawsuits for aiding and abetting traffickers and profiting from it in many states. So, the hotel did or didn't do something based on its own interests. If you Google it you will read horrifying details and them turning a blind eye (i.e. proving my earlier point about companies not protecting the public or its guests).
GA: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/more-dozen-victims-trafficked-metro-212310723.html
OH: https://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/red-roof-inn-staff-complicit-in-sex-trafficking-lawsuit-alleges-columbus-attorney-steven-babin-new-albany-based-company-central-ohio
WA (can't find this reported in news outlets): https://www.law360.com/real-estate-authority/commercial/articles/1678370/seattle-red-roof-inn-hit-with-sex-trafficking-survivor-suit
MD (actual arrests): https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/2-charged-with-human-trafficking-at-jessup-red-roof-inn/

Twitter reports 64,000 Black women remain missing. Here's an NPR report on how Black women disproportionately go missing. https://www.npr.org/2021/09/24/1040048967/missing-black-women-girls-left-out-media-ignored

No matter what happened to Carlee, publicizing all missing women (and children, per above) cases can greatly influence their outcome of being found and helping the police. We know that Black women are often ignored.

Yes, but how many of the specific cases you cite have video capture of the disappearance, as well as a police statement that they have pieced together every footstep the person made prior to that?

So different.

You have no idea. In the Huskins case they had an eye-witness--her boyfriend. It didn't seem to matter at all.

I think you misunderstand. Regardless, a camera and videotape is not the same as a person's account.

Grainy camera footage doesn't tell the entire story. You missed my post just upthread that might fill in some gaps for you:

One more about people thinking everyone would, no doubtedly!, see something on the side of a busy highway. In another inattentional blindness study, 83% of radiologists failed to spot an angry gorilla that had been placed on their slide. As mentioned in the article, these are people trained to detect inconsistencies.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/02/...-gorilla-hiding-in-plain-sight

There was no kid.

You have no idea if there was a kid or not.

There was never a kid. She did this on her own. You being gullible doesn’t change that.

I haven’t weighed in on it at all - I have no idea if there was a kid there. I’m not gullible, I’m aware there is no concrete evidence one way or the other. You, on the other hand, are certain you have knowledge that you simply do not have.

[Anonymous]

TIL inattentional is a word that exists