Boycott/ Divest and Pull your College App from All States which violate Our Daughters' Civil Rights

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fwiw, NC has not banned yet. Neither has VA. NC has a Dem Governor, even

Guess we will see what happens over the next two years.

I think VA is going to swing back, honestly.

Of course, with the Supreme Court on board with this state legislature nonsense, NONE of this matters. Gerrymandered R legislatures Will overturn votes they don’t like in 2024 and the US will have a nationwide ban in 2025.

Which is why my kids are already starting to think about college abroad. They are even pushing us to move out of the US now.

Make sure you let them know that the Dutch police opened fire on unarmed civilians

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look, pro-lifers - no matter what you want to believe, this is already in motion and it's far bigger than DCUM. You can't and won't stop this by going on a message board and calling everyone "nutjobs."

Your states *will* and already are losing revenue as will companies based in your states, and that's entirely the fault of you pro-lifers.

Poll after poll shows that this is not the issue to most people you want it to be. It's just not.

It is. Many products and services will suffer the date of my pillow if they don't push back against this insanity. People are very very angry.

+1

VERY angry.

Barely more than half oppose the SC decision, and less than half strongly oppose it. Only a slim margin of I's oppose and most R's agree. This was right after the decision. It will fade as an issue except for people who were already going to vote D anyway.

"By a 56%-to-40% margin, respondents oppose the court's decision, including 45% who strongly oppose it.

Almost 9-in-10 Democrats and a slim majority of independents (53%) are against the decision. Three-quarters of Republicans, on the other hand, support it."

Better hope that enough to support all these companies, colleges and other institutions because many of us are moving on to places and companies with more respect for women's rights.

Your individual anecdotal decision does not mean the majority of people agree with you. For most people, life goes on. Many of these states already had pretty restrictive abortion laws and were doing just fine. Polls show it is just not a top priority for most.

Go buy a tesla or my pillow if you want. Lots of consumers out here will say no thanks.

+ 1000

And, as PP states, MOST consumers will say who cares? - and buy A Tesla or send a child to Vandy. As an example - Facebook and all of its documented harm to elections, to children, aiding violence Etc etc. and yet no reports of a mass boycott.

you mean the very rich people? because "normal" people cannot buy a tesla or send a kid to vandy

Model 3 was $35k and the majority of people at V get some kind of financial aid.

Please . Median hh income in this country is 44 grand and those families are not driving teslas and going to vanderbilt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look, pro-lifers - no matter what you want to believe, this is already in motion and it's far bigger than DCUM. You can't and won't stop this by going on a message board and calling everyone "nutjobs."

Your states *will* and already are losing revenue as will companies based in your states, and that's entirely the fault of you pro-lifers.

Poll after poll shows that this is not the issue to most people you want it to be. It's just not.

It is. Many products and services will suffer the date of my pillow if they don't push back against this insanity. People are very very angry.

Going after someone like Mike Lindell has really exposed the liberal left. The man provides free drug counseling for addicts, which is something every leftist should get behind, because so many drug addicts are also very poor due to their habit and/or circumstances. Trying to destroy his means of income destroys his ability to help others. You all want free this and free that - here’s a man providing exactly what you want, but because he’s Christian and conservative, all his good does not count, because it’s not YOUR good. Sick stuff

Doing one good thing doesn't absolve you from a sh1t ton of bad things.

He hurt far more people than he helped.

Your definition of bad things is not everyone’s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fwiw, NC has not banned yet. Neither has VA. NC has a Dem Governor, even

Guess we will see what happens over the next two years.

I think VA is going to swing back, honestly.

Of course, with the Supreme Court on board with this state legislature nonsense, NONE of this matters. Gerrymandered R legislatures Will overturn votes they don’t like in 2024 and the US will have a nationwide ban in 2025.

Which is why my kids are already starting to think about college abroad. They are even pushing us to move out of the US now.

Make sure you let them know that the Dutch police opened fire on unarmed civilians

Still way less likely to be killed by a gun outside of the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look, pro-lifers - no matter what you want to believe, this is already in motion and it's far bigger than DCUM. You can't and won't stop this by going on a message board and calling everyone "nutjobs."

Your states *will* and already are losing revenue as will companies based in your states, and that's entirely the fault of you pro-lifers.

Poll after poll shows that this is not the issue to most people you want it to be. It's just not.

It is. Many products and services will suffer the date of my pillow if they don't push back against this insanity. People are very very angry.

Going after someone like Mike Lindell has really exposed the liberal left. The man provides free drug counseling for addicts, which is something every leftist should get behind, because so many drug addicts are also very poor due to their habit and/or circumstances. Trying to destroy his means of income destroys his ability to help others. You all want free this and free that - here’s a man providing exactly what you want, but because he’s Christian and conservative, all his good does not count, because it’s not YOUR good. Sick stuff

I don't have to spend a dime to fund that coup supporters business. And neither do you. There are much better ways to help fight addiction that giving even a penny to that criminal.

And yet the democrats aren’t. Isn’t that interesting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look, pro-lifers - no matter what you want to believe, this is already in motion and it's far bigger than DCUM. You can't and won't stop this by going on a message board and calling everyone "nutjobs."

Your states *will* and already are losing revenue as will companies based in your states, and that's entirely the fault of you pro-lifers.

Poll after poll shows that this is not the issue to most people you want it to be. It's just not.

It is. Many products and services will suffer the date of my pillow if they don't push back against this insanity. People are very very angry.

Going after someone like Mike Lindell has really exposed the liberal left. The man provides free drug counseling for addicts, which is something every leftist should get behind, because so many drug addicts are also very poor due to their habit and/or circumstances. Trying to destroy his means of income destroys his ability to help others. You all want free this and free that - here’s a man providing exactly what you want, but because he’s Christian and conservative, all his good does not count, because it’s not YOUR good. Sick stuff

I don't have to spend a dime to fund that coup supporters business. And neither do you. There are much better ways to help fight addiction that giving even a penny to that criminal.

And yet the democrats aren’t. Isn’t that interesting?

The republicans are the heros of health care? That is laughable.

[Anonymous]

Would Old Miss or Liberty U want my biracial lesbian DD? I highly doubt it. We plan to stick to blue city schools where its ok for faculty and students to be themselves.

Also, the loss of reproductive rights isn't just scary for those seeking abortions. Even for women who decide to keep their pregnancies, miscarriage is still possible, and women are already being turned away and shamed for that. It's our choice not to deal with that.

[Anonymous]

EU Corporations only recently began investing in the US Southern states after a many decades long PR campaign on the part of their Congressmen & Senators to try to erase the stain that they were the lands of Jim Crow, of Lynching- the land of the people who killed Martin Luther King and JFK

but NOW they show themselves with asserting that " we have our State's Rights to control a woman's body.... do not try to tell us about the Universal Civil Rights of Women..." this is our way" .... that these backwaters that clung to the enslavement of their fellow man for hundreds of years- and defended it as " our states rights" REALLY have not changed At ALL

Any US Corporation, EU Corporate entity or Foreign Corp that does not divest from the list outlined below is from here on out complicit:

As of Today, the list of Backward American States where a woman's civil right of bodily autonomy is denied her are:https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/24...tate-laws-criminalization-roe/

Louisiana ( Tulane, LSU ) Corporations to Boycott and Divest from: Walmart, Amazon, Exxon, Apple . EU Corps putting their female employees at risk( or daughters of Corp Execs): Air Liquide, BASF, Evonik, BP, Hunting LPC, Blade Dynamics

Alabama: (Auburn, Univ. of Alabama )Corporations: Regions Financial, Vulcan, Encompass Health. EU Corporations putting employees at risk: Airbus, Mercedes, Hyundai, Toyota

Arkansas: ( Univ of Arkansas ) Walmart, Tyson Foods, Dillards . EU Corps putting employees ( Daughters of Corp Execs) at risk: France: Dassault Falcon Jet, SIMS ( Australia) ; Bekhaert ( Belgium): Canfour, JBS

Missouri: ( Wash U - St Louis, Ole Miss )Emerson Electric, Enterprise Holdings, Douglas McDonell, O'Reilly Auto parts . EU Corp: Germany's Bayer & KWS, Boehringer, POET Processing

Oklahoma: ( OSU ).Corp: Boeing, Google, Dell, Amazon,Acorn, Chesapeake Energy, Avis/Budget. EU Corp: Lufthansa · Michelin · Sanofl-Aventis · Schlumberger · Siemens · Sigma

Utah ( BYU ) Corp: Skywest, Huntsman, Questar EU: Kennecott, Stouffer's Frozen Foods, Exclesior Hotels, Nestlee

Kentucky (University of Kentucky ) Corp to Boycott/ Divest from: Fruit of the Loom, Yum Brands, Humana, Texas Roadhouse. Events: Kentucky Derby. EU/ Foreign Corp: Sumitomo ( a Japanese Co 40 % who's employees are women )

Texas: Univ Texas -Austin, Rice , Baylor. Corp: Boycott / Divest from Keller Williams Realty, Foxconn, Pizza Hut, AT&T, JP Morgan, Bank of America,American Airlines, Dell Foreign Corp Invest: Bayer, BASF, Hanson Cement, Seimens

Mississippi Univ of Miss ) . Corp to boycott: Sta Home Health, Sanderson Farms,Commerce Corp, the Yates Co of Philadelphia. EU Corp putting their female employees at risk:Airbus, ABB, Nissan, Toyota, Continental Tire

Tennessee ( Vanderbilt, Univ of Tenn ) US Corp to Boycott/Divest from: AutoZone, AT& T, Deloitte, Loews,Fed Ex,Dollar General, Ruby Tuesdays, HCA Inc.*** the US state with largest Foreign Corp Investment** is TN so they are vulnerable here, especially Nashville. EU/ Foreign Corp putting their Corp Execs/ female / family employees/ family members at risk: Phillips Electronics, BASF, Nissan, Bridgestone


Women have exponentially more Capital wealth, Corp power and investment dollars than we did in 1973- time to put the full force of that economic and political power to use for our Daughters and Grand -Daughters. Don't just protest- Boycott, Divest and pull your child's college enrollment. Pressure ALL EU Corp not to invest in US States that violate a Woman's civil right to self-determination and bodily autonomy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fwiw, NC has not banned yet. Neither has VA. NC has a Dem Governor, even

Guess we will see what happens over the next two years.

I think VA is going to swing back, honestly.

Of course, with the Supreme Court on board with this state legislature nonsense, NONE of this matters. Gerrymandered R legislatures Will overturn votes they don’t like in 2024 and the US will have a nationwide ban in 2025.

Which is why my kids are already starting to think about college abroad. They are even pushing us to move out of the US now.

Make sure you let them know that the Dutch police opened fire on unarmed civilians

Still way less likely to be killed by a gun outside of the US.

The government shooting at their own citizens because the won’t willingly give their land to the country is WAY worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look, pro-lifers - no matter what you want to believe, this is already in motion and it's far bigger than DCUM. You can't and won't stop this by going on a message board and calling everyone "nutjobs."

Your states *will* and already are losing revenue as will companies based in your states, and that's entirely the fault of you pro-lifers.

Poll after poll shows that this is not the issue to most people you want it to be. It's just not.

It is. Many products and services will suffer the date of my pillow if they don't push back against this insanity. People are very very angry.

Going after someone like Mike Lindell has really exposed the liberal left. The man provides free drug counseling for addicts, which is something every leftist should get behind, because so many drug addicts are also very poor due to their habit and/or circumstances. Trying to destroy his means of income destroys his ability to help others. You all want free this and free that - here’s a man providing exactly what you want, but because he’s Christian and conservative, all his good does not count, because it’s not YOUR good. Sick stuff

I don't have to spend a dime to fund that coup supporters business. And neither do you. There are much better ways to help fight addiction that giving even a penny to that criminal.

And yet the democrats aren’t. Isn’t that interesting?

The republicans are the heros of health care? That is laughable.

Mike Lindell is using his own money to help drug addicts break their addiction.
So yes, I consider that heroic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look, pro-lifers - no matter what you want to believe, this is already in motion and it's far bigger than DCUM. You can't and won't stop this by going on a message board and calling everyone "nutjobs."

Your states *will* and already are losing revenue as will companies based in your states, and that's entirely the fault of you pro-lifers.

Poll after poll shows that this is not the issue to most people you want it to be. It's just not.

It is. Many products and services will suffer the date of my pillow if they don't push back against this insanity. People are very very angry.

Going after someone like Mike Lindell has really exposed the liberal left. The man provides free drug counseling for addicts, which is something every leftist should get behind, because so many drug addicts are also very poor due to their habit and/or circumstances. Trying to destroy his means of income destroys his ability to help others. You all want free this and free that - here’s a man providing exactly what you want, but because he’s Christian and conservative, all his good does not count, because it’s not YOUR good. Sick stuff

I don't have to spend a dime to fund that coup supporters business. And neither do you. There are much better ways to help fight addiction that giving even a penny to that criminal.

And yet the democrats aren’t. Isn’t that interesting?

The republicans are the heros of health care? That is laughable.

Mike Lindell is using his own money to help drug addicts break their addiction.
So yes, I consider that heroic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look, pro-lifers - no matter what you want to believe, this is already in motion and it's far bigger than DCUM. You can't and won't stop this by going on a message board and calling everyone "nutjobs."

Your states *will* and already are losing revenue as will companies based in your states, and that's entirely the fault of you pro-lifers.

Poll after poll shows that this is not the issue to most people you want it to be. It's just not.

It is. Many products and services will suffer the date of my pillow if they don't push back against this insanity. People are very very angry.

Going after someone like Mike Lindell has really exposed the liberal left. The man provides free drug counseling for addicts, which is something every leftist should get behind, because so many drug addicts are also very poor due to their habit and/or circumstances. Trying to destroy his means of income destroys his ability to help others. You all want free this and free that - here’s a man providing exactly what you want, but because he’s Christian and conservative, all his good does not count, because it’s not YOUR good. Sick stuff

I don't have to spend a dime to fund that coup supporters business. And neither do you. There are much better ways to help fight addiction that giving even a penny to that criminal.

And yet the democrats aren’t. Isn’t that interesting?

The republicans are the heros of health care? That is laughable.

Mike Lindell is using his own money to help drug addicts break their addiction.
So yes, I consider that heroic.

Mike Lindell supported a coup and is a traitor. Find a better charity for your hard earned money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fwiw, NC has not banned yet. Neither has VA. NC has a Dem Governor, even

Guess we will see what happens over the next two years.

I think VA is going to swing back, honestly.

Of course, with the Supreme Court on board with this state legislature nonsense, NONE of this matters. Gerrymandered R legislatures Will overturn votes they don’t like in 2024 and the US will have a nationwide ban in 2025.

https://www.axios.com/2022/05/14/abortion-state-laws-bans-roe-supreme-court

yes, here are the laws. For most states it's viability, which was the Roe standard.



Which is why my kids are already starting to think about college abroad. They are even pushing us to move out of the US now.

You do realize that almost every nation abroad has much more restrictive abortion laws than the U.S.?

Nope. You keep trying to push that BS, but it's not true.

It is. It will take you about a minute to google it. Most have term limits and many have some type of waiting period and/or counseling requirement.

European countries with mandatory waiting periods and/or counseling requirements:

Albania
Armenia
Belgium
Bosnia Hertz
Georgia
Germany
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Portugal
Russia
Slovakia
Spain

In a number of these countries, such as Germany and Hungary, laws require biased and directive counselling deliberately intended to influence women’s decision-making and dissuade them from having an abortion.

Still lying. Half the states in the US are rapidly moving toward no abotion at all for any reason except death of the mother.

The list you give isn't remotely comparable.

You are either really obtuse or just plain ignorant, which is supported by you not supporting your lying claims with one iota of fact. Abortion is available in the U.S. up until the moment of birth if you choose to go to a place where it is allowed. Individual states have restrictions, but as a country, it is not as restrictive as most other countries, which actually have fairly strict timelines as well as counseling/waiting periods which we do not. There are multiple, multiple sources on the rights and restrictions in other countries. If you choose to not believe them, that is your problem, but it doesn't make me a liar.

Yes it does. Moment of birth? What kind of nonsense are you spewing? That is not happening unless there is some kind of total life or death emergency.


Overturning Roe by a bunch of old conservative mostly men just shoved our sons and daughters back 50 years. We all had more rights than our daughters now do. It's outrageous.

SO true!


And here's the truth, unlike the garbage the earlier poster was spewing.
https://www.axios.com/2022/05/14/abortion-state-laws-bans-roe-supreme-court

About 93% of reported abortions in 2019 were performed at or before 13 weeks of pregnancy, 6% were conducted between 14 and 20 weeks and 1% were performed at or after 21 weeks, according to the most recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

People who tend to have abortions later in a pregnancy do so because of "medical concerns such as fetal anomalies or maternal life endangerment, as well as barriers to care that cause delays in obtaining an abortion," per the Kaiser Family Foundation.

People aren't waltzing into abortion clinics at 30 weeks just to have an elective abortion.

Per your own link, it is exactly as I stated, abortion is legal up to the point of birth if someone chooses to go to a state where it is available. Did I say people were waltzing in on a regular basis and asking for an abortion at the time of birth? No. I did say it is legal in the U.S., and I was not wrong, and that it is not allowed in other countries, and I AGAIN was not wrong.

NP. Well, abortions are legal "up to the point of birth" in most European countries as well for medical reasons (either woman's health or fetal defect), if you want to use the word abortion that way.

I know there are barriers to abortion access in Europe as well. But reproductive rights are not just one law about the number of weeks since your last period, it's a whole ecosystem of sexual education, other public services, social attitudes, etc. I would be happy to discuss and consider a European *system* in which abortions are easily accessible and free, but with gestational limits depending on circumstances. But that is not remotely the proposal being put forward by the anti-abortion movement in the US at the moment. They are not pushing for a law in which there's a 12 week limit for abortions on request, 18 weeks for rape/incest/socioeconomic circumstances, 22 weeks in case of fetal abnormality, or no limit in case of woman's health / fetal incompatibility with life issues. When there are cases of miscarrying women having to wait until they go septic in Texas, or 10-year-olds who are just over 6 weeks pregnant (~4 weeks post conception) needing to drive out of state in Ohio to access an abortion, it is really not a good faith argument to hand-wave that European countries also have abortion regulations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look, pro-lifers - no matter what you want to believe, this is already in motion and it's far bigger than DCUM. You can't and won't stop this by going on a message board and calling everyone "nutjobs."

Your states *will* and already are losing revenue as will companies based in your states, and that's entirely the fault of you pro-lifers.

How do you explain the mass exodus from CA, NY, IL, etc. to FL and TX?

How do you explain today’s news about employment rates in Red states outshining Blue states post-covid?

Btw, I’m a Dem. But I read all the news and I don’t cherry-pick stats to support my thinking. Rather, I strive to step back to see the bigger picture and connect the dots.

You should try it. Everyone should…especially our Dem leaders who should be working 24/7 on capitalizing on this moment to win midterms.

+1

I’m in CA and people have been flooding back. It’s actually annoying. I wish they’d stay in the red states. Traffic was better.

Respectfully, there is no net migration to CA from red states.

Yes, there is now. It’s ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

And this: https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2022/07/01/ohio-abortion-ban-sponsor-says-baby-born-of-rape-incest-still-has-the-right-to-life/

is what is Coming to Ohio for victims of rape, women exercising their right to autonomy over their own bodies and the Corporations that Risk staying in business in the State