So who here went to the ballet coronavirus party?

Anonymous
Isn’t she the woman who got all the press way, way long ago (during the LNS/ Smith Point days) for getting Set up by her own grandmother to some old millionaire and then getting engaged on his yacht, all in again, off again. It was a regular item in the Reliable Source back in the day. The entire situation was so gross. Set up by your own grandmother to one of her friends?!!!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article is dumb. While having the party was a bad idea and a violation of guidelines, there’s no indication than anyone actually contracted the virus from it. Why is this news?


Did you read it? Several people tested positive afterwards.

I ordered something from her website, secretly gifting, 1.5 weeks ago and then last week I got an email that said the item would be shipping directly from the vendor and not from them because one of them (there are 2, Ashley and Candace) had tested positive for Covid. usually the item would come from the company, all wrapped super nice and not straight from the vendor. If you follow the other partners insta, she was definitely sick last week, which would put her Covid after Ashley’s.


Yes, did you read it? Rumors of positive tests are not exactly hard-hitting journalism.


Nice try, are you Ashley? She’s a superspreader. She knew she was sick and had the party anyway. SMH.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article is dumb. While having the party was a bad idea and a violation of guidelines, there’s no indication than anyone actually contracted the virus from it. Why is this news?


I live in the neighborhood. People who were there are testing positive. And people are PISSED that she didn't tell her attendees right away.


Anyone who actually violated the law and contracted the virus has no one to blame but themselves. To be pissed that the person you engaged in criminal activity with wasn't an honest person is a little hypocritical.

Everyone on the guest list needs to be fined some huge amount, and that money needs to be donated to provide corona relief for innocent victims.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article is dumb. While having the party was a bad idea and a violation of guidelines, there’s no indication than anyone actually contracted the virus from it. Why is this news?


Did you read it? Several people tested positive afterwards.

I ordered something from her website, secretly gifting, 1.5 weeks ago and then last week I got an email that said the item would be shipping directly from the vendor and not from them because one of them (there are 2, Ashley and Candace) had tested positive for Covid. usually the item would come from the company, all wrapped super nice and not straight from the vendor. If you follow the other partners insta, she was definitely sick last week, which would put her Covid after Ashley’s.


Yes, did you read it? Rumors of positive tests are not exactly hard-hitting journalism.


Nice try, are you Ashley? She’s a superspreader. She knew she was sick and had the party anyway. SMH.


What a fact-free post. Tell us how many she spread it to then, since the article only said there were rumoured positives.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is not the PR the WSB needs right now.


can we also talk about how all that fundraising effort was for the ballet as opposed to things that people actually need right now?


The arts are important to many, many people. Not on the same level as healthcare, no, but fundraising has to continue if the arts are to survive. (not that that excuses her silly party)


agreed. And the performing arts are in deep trouble -- with indoor crowds and no ability to social distance (for performers), it's completely up in the air when they can resume. Hope WSB doesn't get bad publicity; as far as I can tell, they had nothing to do with this bad idea party.


+1

NP. The article says no one from the ballet attended or performed at the party. And it's clear that the ballet had zero input, approval, anything. This was entirely this one foolish woman's idea.I hope that any subsequent recycling of this incident does not reflect badly on the dance company because none of it is on them.

Total agreement with you PPs above regarding the arts.

What some posters here, those saying "food etc first" are forgetting is that actual human beings with families, rents, mortgages, and yes, food bills, work for arts organizations.

I think people see only actors, dancers, and well-known solo musicians and think they ARE the performing arts, period. But the reality is that there are many families supported by the arts--performers, yes, and also management staffs, design and costume staffs, whole orchestras of not-famous but steadily working musicians, lighting techs, sound techs, concession workers, restaurant workers at some theaters, cleaning crews, staff and teachers for dance and theater programs...and on and on.

These are not magical jobs that only appear when a performance is taking place, but full-time jobs and careers for many. Those employees are now just as unemployed as anyone who works in a factory or store or bar. And their families have exactly the same needs as any family.

So if you'd raise money to help any out of work employee, then you can also raise money to help arts organizations that employ many people, all of whom are out of work and likely to be out of work for a very, very long time.

The benefit to the overall community of the performing arts, in terms of making us as human beings a bit more thoughtful, wiser, and happier -- that's priceless, even if you yourself don't take advantage of it. But even if you personally dislike or don't get anything out of dance or theater or concerts, it's worthwhile to understand that those things do employ people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can only see part of the story. Anyone have pics?


I pay for good journalism, which includes good photos.


Well I lost my job in April, and cut back on all non-essentials. But at least you had a chance to feel superior.


You can get plenty of news content for free. If you miss out on a few articles about parties, you are not entitled to them. How many journalists and photographers do you think have lost their job, because their work is "non-essential"? But at least you had a chance to feel entitled.
Anonymous
If my house and yard and pool (!) were that nice I wouldn’t have felt desperate to break the rules to get my customary level of social adulation...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article is dumb. While having the party was a bad idea and a violation of guidelines, there’s no indication than anyone actually contracted the virus from it. Why is this news?


Did you read it? Several people tested positive afterwards.

I ordered something from her website, secretly gifting, 1.5 weeks ago and then last week I got an email that said the item would be shipping directly from the vendor and not from them because one of them (there are 2, Ashley and Candace) had tested positive for Covid. usually the item would come from the company, all wrapped super nice and not straight from the vendor. If you follow the other partners insta, she was definitely sick last week, which would put her Covid after Ashley’s.


Candace must have taken down the posts about being sick.

There is a post about a Virtual Summer Pop Up from 6 weeks ago, but that's about it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is a bit sketchy is that the Kent/Palisades neighborhood only went up ONE positive since June 18th. Seems doubtful in light of this story. I asked elsewhere, when the rich go across the Potomac to get their testing done and healthcare needs met in Virginia, do their positives show up in the DC tally?


They should. It is based on residency.


They should, but do they? It would require functioning reciprocal agreements between the department of health of the two cities or states, which might not be happening. What if those positives don't end up showing up in the data for either city because of this? Only one new positive since the 18th in the neighborhood that includes Ashley's residence, and I know of 1 person who tested positive in that same time frame in that neighborhood.
This could explain the eerily light color on that side of town in the dc doh coronavirus map, AND lead those residents to behave less responsibly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article is dumb. While having the party was a bad idea and a violation of guidelines, there’s no indication than anyone actually contracted the virus from it. Why is this news?


Did you read it? Several people tested positive afterwards.

I ordered something from her website, secretly gifting, 1.5 weeks ago and then last week I got an email that said the item would be shipping directly from the vendor and not from them because one of them (there are 2, Ashley and Candace) had tested positive for Covid. usually the item would come from the company, all wrapped super nice and not straight from the vendor. If you follow the other partners insta, she was definitely sick last week, which would put her Covid after Ashley’s.


Yes, did you read it? Rumors of positive tests are not exactly hard-hitting journalism.


Nice try, are you Ashley? She’s a superspreader. She knew she was sick and had the party anyway. SMH.


Not Ashley. Don’t even live in the DC area. Silly me for caring about accurate representations in journalism.
Anonymous
It's amusing that rich people think they are immune to the virus.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article is dumb. While having the party was a bad idea and a violation of guidelines, there’s no indication than anyone actually contracted the virus from it. Why is this news?


Did you read it? Several people tested positive afterwards.

I ordered something from her website, secretly gifting, 1.5 weeks ago and then last week I got an email that said the item would be shipping directly from the vendor and not from them because one of them (there are 2, Ashley and Candace) had tested positive for Covid. usually the item would come from the company, all wrapped super nice and not straight from the vendor. If you follow the other partners insta, she was definitely sick last week, which would put her Covid after Ashley’s.


Candace must have taken down the posts about being sick.

There is a post about a Virtual Summer Pop Up from 6 weeks ago, but that's about it.


It was in her instastories. One was about Ashley sending her lunch delivered from her favorite restaurant. I only remember bc I was checking her account based on the email that someone was sick and I am nosy sometimes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's amusing that rich people think they are immune to the virus.


Let’s be honest, people of all income levels think they’re immune to this virus. Not that compelling an angle for the story.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:picture of backyard - https://mylittlebird.com/2016/10/first-look-the-spring-valley-house-tour/


Outdoor TVs are so trashy
Forum Index » Health and Medicine
Go to: