Those are two very different things. One is a person bringing a complaint to a teacher or administrator. That should be fully investigated. Individual anonymous stories on line are useless. Collectively yes they present a problem. But I will never believe individual posts from anonymous posters. Do something to ensure complaints are investigated. Don’t waste your energy on these posts though. |
Exactly. Parents and admin want to focus on Restorative Justice. |
It is false to suggest that these stories are all naming names. For example, the "survivors at bcc" instagram account is not naming survivors nor minor children. (They are naming adult teachers.) So, no school-aged boy is being accused by name. The fact that many students know the name attached to a particular story, even if the posting doesn't disclose the name, is a function of the fact that survivors and their perpetrators talk. So a girl who survives a sexual assault may talk to friends about it, may confront the boy about it, who may respond in ways that acknowledge that the incident did in fact take place, etc. It is impossible and immoral, IMO, to suggest that victims should remain quiet about these incidents unless they report the incident to police and/or have a conviction. So much of what happens is either not "criminal" or criminal but not actionable or criminal but actionable but systems refuse to conduct legitimate prosecution/recourse that the girls have developed their own whisper network to protect themselves. IMO, this is a predictable consequence of having a criminal justice and educational system, both of which fail to protect school age victims of sexual assault and harassment. Anonymous posting happens when existing systems of justice/recourse/protection aren't working. If you want to stop anonymous posting, you have to offer legitimate working forms of recourse that make victims feel that those channels are safe and effective. That doesn't happen at all (yet). |
Sorry, but as these girls have seen from the MeToo movement, anonymous stories can be quite powerful when they demonstrate patterns of abuse that go unaddressed or they identify perpetrators responsible for multiple criminal acts in a similar pattern. Would that we had a Ryan Farrow, Jody Kantor or Megan Twohey who would pursue these claims, put together the narratives and publicly identify repeat perpetrators and administrators who act as facilitators or bystanders. Even the adult women who created the google doc "shitty media men" that identified industry perpetrators were able to force a number of men out of positions of power. Yale women also created a similar doc. HS girls have seen the power that their stories hold and that is not going away, whether they use whisper networks or confront boys in school and force the admin to hold school discussions on incidents (as happened with the ranking list at BCC, reported in WaPo, the Kojo show, and other local media.) These complaints should be taken seriously and investigated, whether or not they contain names. The anonymous stories reflect a serious problem with sexual assault and harassment in schools that at a minimum can and should be ameliorated by increased training, better accountability mechanisms and better sex education in the areas of consent and criminal sexual behavior. |
This presumably happened pre-pandemic |
| Wait, the principal of Blair blocked the students on Twitter? No matter your opinion about broadcasting allegations on social media, that's absolutely absurd. |
|
Restorative Justice, as intended, may be fabulous. I wouldn't know, because the way mcps does it, is not as intended. They put the victim and the accused in a room, the accused gives the victim an insincere apology, victim is told to accept. Then all is declared well. No consequence for the accused (other than being forced to give the apology, which is insincere).
Like a secondary assault for the victim, who has to suffer seeing their attacker/abuser/bullier every day at school. |
Not only absurd, but likely unconstitutional. Principal Renay Johnson’s Twitter account is not being used as her personal Twitter. She is using it as an official government employee/position account and as such, cannot block members of the public. Sort of like how Donald trump cannot block users. See https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/trump-twitter-first-amendment.amp.html It’s first amendment issue. |
P.S. A smart blocked student would get in touch with Jameel Jaffer at the Knight Institute and see if he or the institute could provide some pro bono support to challenge the principal and MCPS on the issue of blocking students on Twitter. |
|
WOOTEN HS
HAHAHAHAHA |
No where did I state that victims should stay quiet. Stop putting words in my mouth. The point is that the anonymous posting is akin to rumor and gossip without any evidence. In this liberal area, the court of public opinion has probably tried and convicted the accused. That's not right, either. There have been several false accusations, as well. That iis thee consequence of believing people without any evidence. "Trust but verify"... some people seem eager for the trust but not the verify part. |
|
BCCC and WOOTTEN
Students of color EXPERIENCED BIAS and sexual advances |
She blocked my daughter on Twitter for just asking early on why she wasn’t making a statement about it. |
That’s because verify never comes. The current system is report, ignore, silence victim, protect perpetrator. Now you can see that a crappy justice system hurts men as well as women. For years, men have structured the system to avoid prosecution, but when you do that you also prevent men having access to a system that clears them of unwarranted accusations. Lie in the bed you made..... as they say. |