Michelle Obama's Schiaparelli Gown Was Designed to Match Her "Strength and Energy"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Let me guess.

That is NOT her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand the outrage that the dress makes her look square in the waist and small-chested.

Both of those things are how her body is shaped. Why does everything we wear have to "flatter" us to make our body a way it's not???

Why would you dress up for a glamorous event and spend thousands of dollars on an unflattering gown? This makes no sense.

Because the Obamas cannot survive without attention. They need to go away and get quiet.

I agree.

I wish they'd disappear.

They need the money.

It takes effort to become billionaires.

[Anonymous]

That dress looks like something Beyonce or JLo would wear. MO is too old for that dress.

It seems like MO has changes stylists since leaving the White House,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like Michelle but she seems determined to wear yellow and she shouldn't.

Why not? I think the color itself looks great on brown skin.

[Anonymous]

It looks better on the slimmer, more hourglass figure on the drawing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Let me guess.

That is NOT her.

Not even close!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That fit is awful. It shows that she has no waist--you should never wear a sparkly belt at your waistline if you're built like that. IT's all wrong for her.

but she always had a pear shape and always seemed to have a fairly small waist, but this looks like a barrel with boobs drawn on

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Let me guess.

That is NOT her.

Not even close!

That is perhaps one fourth of her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That fit is awful. It shows that she has no waist--you should never wear a sparkly belt at your waistline if you're built like that. IT's all wrong for her.

but she always had a pear shape and always seemed to have a fairly small waist, but this looks like a barrel with boobs drawn on

To be fair, she’s a woman in her late 50s and many women’s bodies change as they get older. Our bodies take on a different shape than when we were younger and there is only so much one can do about it.

I think she is beautiful just as she is, but that dress is not flattering. Her face is glowing, though, and she looks happy, which really is more important than how one looks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like Michelle but she seems determined to wear yellow and she shouldn't.

Why not? I think the color itself looks great on brown skin.

It depends on what undertone you have (says a brown woman with yellow undertones). I would look like I have jaundice if I wore yellow/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG! Does she not have a mirror? No waist in sight! A tall woman like her, has to fish really, really bad to get a dress that is such a bad fit! Any dress would look better than that!

I've thought MO's taste was a little...eccentric since I saw her in those thigh-high glitter boots. She's wearing stuff that makes her look like a drag-queen rather than a successful and beautiful first lady - IMO.

Agree. This was another hideous outfit. Those boots!!

This was shockingly bad. I couldn't believe that she wore that.

But this latest monstrosity may have even topped that awful combo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG! Does she not have a mirror? No waist in sight! A tall woman like her, has to fish really, really bad to get a dress that is such a bad fit! Any dress would look better than that!

I've thought MO's taste was a little...eccentric since I saw her in those thigh-high glitter boots. She's wearing stuff that makes her look like a drag-queen rather than a successful and beautiful first lady - IMO.

Agree. This was another hideous outfit. Those boots!!

This was shockingly bad. I couldn't believe that she wore that.

But this latest monstrosity may have even topped that awful combo.

Those boots were 4,000 dollars. Proof that it costs a lot of money to look really cheap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand the outrage that the dress makes her look square in the waist and small-chested.

Both of those things are how her body is shaped. Why does everything we wear have to "flatter" us to make our body a way it's not???

Why would you dress up for a glamorous event and spend thousands of dollars on an unflattering gown? This makes no sense.

Because the Obamas cannot survive without attention. They need to go away and get quiet.

I agree.

I wish they'd disappear.

They need the money.

It takes effort to become billionaires.

lol! What a great response!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her face is looking beautiful! Very youthful and pretty.

And I love the color, but the design is ugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG! Does she not have a mirror? No waist in sight! A tall woman like her, has to fish really, really bad to get a dress that is such a bad fit! Any dress would look better than that!

I've thought MO's taste was a little...eccentric since I saw her in those thigh-high glitter boots. She's wearing stuff that makes her look like a drag-queen rather than a successful and beautiful first lady - IMO.

Agree. This was another hideous outfit. Those boots!!

This was shockingly bad. I couldn't believe that she wore that.

But this latest monstrosity may have even topped that awful combo.

She looks like a giant next to SJP. Of course, so so most people.