Weak troll is weak
|
False. A bone stock Wrangler is a plenty capable off roader. |
Yes, it is. A bone stock Wrangler is capable of running trails that would exclude almost every other 4x4 on earth, except for modified or Rubicon Wranglers, current generation G-Wagons, or modified Toyotas. It's certainly far more capable than "soft-roaders" like Range Rovers or other luxury SUVs. |
It’s very basic. It cannot do more than dirt roads in less it is modified. It does not have the same or even close to the rubicon. |
| Very few trails around here that require anything beyond a stock Wrangler. Sure, the Rubicon is more capable and has more gee gaws but to say a stock sport can’t do much is the height of ignorance. Either you are not a Jeep person or you are the kind of Jeep person who views an angry birds grille as a cool mod. |
|
My only jeep that could really handle roads was my Jeep CJ7. Had a 302, push bars in front with a winch hook up, tow hitch in rear and a lift kit so sat high and CB radio
And Levi package and steel floors could hose down interior. Came from factory no radio and no heat or defroster. Steel dashboard. I hit a tree once and bounced off. Lap belts only. And a carb no fuel injection or shift in fly. Had to lock the hubs to go to 4 wheel drive. Plus manual steering, manual brakes and 3 speed manual. Just a large engine strapped to frame |
You're talking completely out of your ass. You have no idea WTF you're babbling about. Leave this discussion to the people here who've actually owned Jeeps and have actually driven them off road. Because that ain't you. The only real differences between a stock Wrangler and a Rubicon are the locking diffs, electronic sway bar disconnects, the tires, and the transfer case gear ratio. Other than that, they're identical vehicles. Those four factors DO make a considerable contribution to off-road performance, but only in circumstances such as really, really difficult rock-crawling situations. And since literally no other factory built vehicle could match a Rubicon, it's sort of a pointless distinction anyway. I've personally driven a bone-stock rental Wrangler (a TJ and JK) over the Rubicon Trail twice. When I say bone-stock, I mean right down to the factory Goodyear GS-A tires. The only options either had were tow hooks and TracLoc LSRD. I needed a tug one time in the TJ at Big Sluice, and a couple times in the JK at Gatekeeper (it was wet from rain. In dry conditions it would've easily walked it). I've also driven stock rental Wranglers at Moab too many times to count. Go ply your BS someplace else where you won't run into people who know better. |
I own a Rubicon JL. Good Try. They are extremely basic, and sure they will work but they are not much different than an AWD SUV. JLs have a lot more than the JK's. |
The 302 is a Ford motor. AMC never partnered with FoMoCo to source engines. The ONLY V8's ever used in CJ7's were 304 MOPAR engines sourced to AMC. And the 304 is a smallblock V8, certainly not a "large engine strapped to the frame". It never made more than 181 hp. Perhaps yours was a swapped-in conversion from a 80's Ford F-series pickup? |
Look dude, I've owned more Jeeps than I have fingers. You don't know WTF you're talking about. |
| ^^this guy is correct. The guy above should return his JL, he doesn’t deserve it and probably has only driven off-road to park at the Gold Cup. |