Kate Middleton glamming it up at the State Dinner

[Anonymous]

I think her face would look better if she put on some weight again. A little facial fat is a natural filler

Why do all of you inject shit into your faces so young? It isn’t a good look

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it me or does that necklace look like cake bunting?

It's a whole outfit no from me. Far better ways to put all of this together but the pieces and the look of her face just makes it horrible.

Here's the Queen wearing a similar tiara, with the same necklace shortened, better makeup, and a far more elegant dress - age 35 and killing it.

That is a different necklace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those look like drapes from the 80s. And the bad part of the 80s. Also why are the Brits so against botox? Its such a game changer to this age range. Shoot up Kate, the rest of us look way better!

I just want to give you a hug and tell you that you're beautiful with or without wrinkles. To each his own, but when you look at someone like Kate and can only see how she needs botox, I worry about how you see yourself.

+1. Can't believe some responses here--these women who hold their appearance above all else.

It is one or two posters talking to themselves.

All of the Kate threads are like that.

[Anonymous]

Huh, I don't think she looks older at all. She is a beautiful young woman. How can anyone think she looks old? That seems crazy to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry QE2 looks 15 years older than Kate in that pic

Kate could pass for 43 in the photo.

I wonder if not aging well is almost a requirement? They both look far older.

It's not just genes - Kate could age so, so much better if she had 10, maybe 15lbs on her.

That's the case with each of her pregnancies. She looks absolutely glowing. Then she looses it all and looks like skeletor.

Yes x a million. 10 pounds would make her look so much better

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Huh, I don't think she looks older at all. She is a beautiful young woman. How can anyone think she looks old? That seems crazy to me.

It is crazy. She's beautiful, poised, and elegant. So many of these posters are simply jealous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry QE2 looks 15 years older than Kate in that pic

Kate could pass for 43 in the photo.

I wonder if not aging well is almost a requirement? They both look far older.

It's not just genes - Kate could age so, so much better if she had 10, maybe 15lbs on her.

No. Then you all would say she's fat. Face it, she is exactly who she is, and you can't stand it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry QE2 looks 15 years older than Kate in that pic

Kate could pass for 43 in the photo.

I wonder if not aging well is almost a requirement? They both look far older.

It's not just genes - Kate could age so, so much better if she had 10, maybe 15lbs on her.

No. Then you all would say she's fat. Face it, she is exactly who she is, and you can't stand it.

The picture where she was sitting on the stick she is kind of fat. But Kate pregnant wasn't fat - she was perfect. Flushed with glow and a good 10 pounds heavier in all the right places - cheeks, breasts, waist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry QE2 looks 15 years older than Kate in that pic

Kate could pass for 43 in the photo.

I wonder if not aging well is almost a requirement? They both look far older.

It's not just genes - Kate could age so, so much better if she had 10, maybe 15lbs on her.

Agreed, I used to be so envious of her athletic body. The weight and the harsh makeup is really aging her.

They call this the "Middleton woman" eyeliner and it is really, really awful. She insists on this black liner all the way around her eyes and it is horribly aging and dated. Add in being underweight and a (former?) sun worshipper, and she is definitely in the prematurely aging category.

I always thought she had some eyeliner tattooing because no one would cling to that awful outlining for this many years. It really looks dated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry QE2 looks 15 years older than Kate in that pic

Kate could pass for 43 in the photo.

I wonder if not aging well is almost a requirement? They both look far older.

It's not just genes - Kate could age so, so much better if she had 10, maybe 15lbs on her.

No. Then you all would say she's fat. Face it, she is exactly who she is, and you can't stand it.

The picture where she was sitting on the stick she is kind of fat. But Kate pregnant wasn't fat - she was perfect. Flushed with glow and a good 10 pounds heavier in all the right places - cheeks, breasts, waist.

Uh, no. She looks healthy, athletic, and beautiful. You clearly have a disordered view of weight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry QE2 looks 15 years older than Kate in that pic

Kate could pass for 43 in the photo.

I wonder if not aging well is almost a requirement? They both look far older.

It's not just genes - Kate could age so, so much better if she had 10, maybe 15lbs on her.

Agreed, I used to be so envious of her athletic body. The weight and the harsh makeup is really aging her.

They call this the "Middleton woman" eyeliner and it is really, really awful. She insists on this black liner all the way around her eyes and it is horribly aging and dated. Add in being underweight and a (former?) sun worshipper, and she is definitely in the prematurely aging category.

I always thought she had some eyeliner tattooing because no one would cling to that awful outlining for this many years. It really looks dated.

Every pic of her, I think this. And it's only going to look worse with age. It's like her mom taught her girls how to do this after being taught at an Estee Lauder Counter in 1985 and they've all clung to it for their entire lives. If she only lined the upper lid and outer corners she would look 5+ years younger in an instant.

[Anonymous]

That dress looks like it might be vintage but it is ugly nonetheless. I think she looks a little weathered here, but Kate obv doesn't care so why does anyone else?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry QE2 looks 15 years older than Kate in that pic

Kate could pass for 43 in the photo.

I wonder if not aging well is almost a requirement? They both look far older.

It's not just genes - Kate could age so, so much better if she had 10, maybe 15lbs on her.

Agreed, I used to be so envious of her athletic body. The weight and the harsh makeup is really aging her.

They call this the "Middleton woman" eyeliner and it is really, really awful. She insists on this black liner all the way around her eyes and it is horribly aging and dated. Add in being underweight and a (former?) sun worshipper, and she is definitely in the prematurely aging category.

I always thought she had some eyeliner tattooing because no one would cling to that awful outlining for this many years. It really looks dated.

Every pic of her, I think this. And it's only going to look worse with age. It's like her mom taught her girls how to do this after being taught at an Estee Lauder Counter in 1985 and they've all clung to it for their entire lives. If she only lined the upper lid and outer corners she would look 5+ years younger in an instant.

I thought so too until I saw the Vogue 100 cover shoot they did and her eye make up is much better - without the raccoon ring:

[Anonymous]

Terrible dress, makes her look like she has no boobs. Not elegant at all. Jewelry is nice though.

[Anonymous]

Yet more proof that having children literally sucks the life out of you.