You don't think that, maybe the same kids might not have been accepted to more than one? This could dramatically decrease your 21% |
Just FYI, that link shows number who were accepted, NOT number who attend. Since students can and do get accepted to multiple schools, the number is much lower than 21%. |
|
Attending from Whitman per Naviance Data
Gold Standard - 9 Brainiacs - 3 Just Missed - 8 Just Missed Braniacs - 4 Nothing to be Ashamed of - 28 Where is That Again - 6 Safety Schools - 9 Total - 67 (14%) |
Ah. So wonder what the schools that the other 86% of students are attending are considered? |
| Hey guys way to take a nice funny satirical OP and turn it into the same old shtuff. |
|
Here is the real question:
Your kid is an asshole and he goes to one of OP's listed universities, are there still bragging rights? |
Of course, in the circles OP is mocking. Did all of you self-righteous people just stumble on DCUM for the first time this week? |
You have some very strange groupings. You put UCLA and Notre Dame, two of the best known schools in the country in "Where is that again?" and Bowdoin/Middlebury in "Nothing to be ashamed of". Bowdoin/Middlebury are very good schools, but would probably be the least well known on your list. I think the academies should be separated out as a unique case. I agree they have prestige, at least in some circles, but they are working a different dimension to HYPSM. Tufts, Wash U, and Emory should never be thought of as "Safety Schools". They are not as well known due to the lack of top level athletics, but they are as selective or more selective as schools you categorize more favorably elsewhere. It is difficult to do these groupings. I think there is rough consensus on Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, and MIT in the top group, and I'd add Caltech, but below that I don't think there is as much of a consensus. I'd just say there is a larger following group than you show, including schools like Chicago, Brown, Duke, Penn, Dartmouth, Williams, and Amherst. |
|
Top Tier “Brainiac” schools:
Chicago Swarthmore Cal Tech MIT Next Tier: Carleton St. John’s Rice Davidson Harvey Mudd |
| lol at thinking Davidson is a braniac school. It ranks 54th nationally for alumni earning PhDs per capita. St. John's is in not in the top 20, whereas HYP, Williams, Pomona, Haverford, and Amherst are. Those are the real next tier braniac schools. |
Say what? Tell |
It is really odd & kind of creepy that you even have this kind of random information about this very small college (or any other for that matter). Are you the poster who spews your strange vitriol for this school on almost every thread where it is mentioned? Are you pathologically bitter about not getting in or about them accepting your kid’s (obviously less worthy!) archenemy over him or her or something? -NP with no affiliation whatsoever with Davidson |
|
Good points about the SLACs
Maybe I just never think about them because I only look at rankings of major research universities |
Because they are rich and would rather have pookie free to come to the spring break vacay on the private island? |
Uhh, this data is pretty easy to find. https://www.swarthmore.edu/institutional-research/doctorates-awarded Davidson is NOT a top PhD feeder school and it has never had such a reputation. The top PhD feeder LACs, in no order, are SWAP, Haverford, Bryn Mawr, Grinnell, Macalester, Oberlin, Carleton, Reed, and Harvey Mudd. |