Fear and anger. Fuels Trump’s base

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles manson, nra tea baggers, fox news, hitler, etc... all use fear to fuel anger. They cultivate it and use it to dupe the ignorant into becoming willing pawns n thier desperate game. True evil walks among us.

Yes, and that's why the left keeps making comparisons to Hitler. It's insulting to the memory of the murdered and the nightmares of the survivors. And all it is is a Democratic campaign strategy - to scare the crap out of minorities so they'll go to the polls. Turnout is key to a Democratic win, and fear is a great motivator. And it's basically all they have.

So yes, OP...I agree with fear and anger, but it's the fear being generated from the left. And as far as anger, have you read this forum? The hateful accusations against anyone who dared not vote for Hillary is on a level I've never seen before (and I'm 60).

Your memory must be failing you.

DP, but seriously? Nothing of substance to add to the PP’s very well-articulated argument? S/he is absolutely right. Fear mongering is the left’s stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (liberals) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate minorities into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting poor people out to the polls to vote for the Democrats. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Republican? According to these morons, you’re Hitler incarnate. It sounds like something out of a Mel Brooks satire... until you realize this is actually happening.

DP, but seriously? Nothing of substance to add to the PP’s very well-articulated argument? S/he is absolutely right. Fear mongering is the right's stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (conservatives) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate lower-middle-class whites into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting people named (or who know someone named) Wayne out to the polls to vote for the Republicans. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Democrat? According to these morons, you’re, gasp, "a liberal" incarnate. It sounds like something out of The Handmaid's Tale... until you realize this is actually happening.

I see not only do you have difficulty formatting, but you’re not original or creative enough to come up with your own words (or thoughts). No worries! You so beautifully illustrated the liberal mindset: follow like sheep.

But seriously? Nothing of substance to add to my very well-articulated argument? I am absolutely right.

Fear mongering is the right's stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (conservatives) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate lower-middle-class whites into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting people named (or who know someone named) Wayne out to the polls to vote for the Republicans. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Democrat? According to these morons, you’re, gasp, "a liberal" incarnate. It sounds like something out of The Handmaid's Tale... until you realize this is actually happening.

The party of peace and tolerance is above using fear to motivate its base.

Hence the left has never declared that the GOP was waging a war on women, used crises to advocate for gun control, or used fear of racist whites to rile up its base.

Nor have leftists ever marched in the streets to protest against any of these fears, despite my lying eyes.

Never, ever.

Not once.

Ever.

Slow-witted Republican,

used crises to advocate for gun control

Um, yes, we have done that. It hasn't worked, because "gun control" died (with all those little kids) at Sandy Hook. The new term is "massacre reduction" -- laws that reduce open access to semi-automatics/extended magazines/bump stocks/silencers in ways that result in a) fewer massacres and b) when they happen (there's too many guns for them not to) maybe fewer dead people. Seems, y'know, like kind of a nice thing...

or used fear of racist whites to rile up its base.

I think you mean: used the fears of racist whites to rile up its base. That's straight outta the Republican playbook. And it works!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles manson, nra tea baggers, fox news, hitler, etc... all use fear to fuel anger. They cultivate it and use it to dupe the ignorant into becoming willing pawns n thier desperate game. True evil walks among us.

Yes, and that's why the left keeps making comparisons to Hitler. It's insulting to the memory of the murdered and the nightmares of the survivors. And all it is is a Democratic campaign strategy - to scare the crap out of minorities so they'll go to the polls. Turnout is key to a Democratic win, and fear is a great motivator. And it's basically all they have.

So yes, OP...I agree with fear and anger, but it's the fear being generated from the left. And as far as anger, have you read this forum? The hateful accusations against anyone who dared not vote for Hillary is on a level I've never seen before (and I'm 60).

Your memory must be failing you.

DP, but seriously? Nothing of substance to add to the PP’s very well-articulated argument? S/he is absolutely right. Fear mongering is the left’s stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (liberals) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate minorities into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting poor people out to the polls to vote for the Democrats. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Republican? According to these morons, you’re Hitler incarnate. It sounds like something out of a Mel Brooks satire... until you realize this is actually happening.

DP, but seriously? Nothing of substance to add to the PP’s very well-articulated argument? S/he is absolutely right. Fear mongering is the right's stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (conservatives) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate lower-middle-class whites into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting people named (or who know someone named) Wayne out to the polls to vote for the Republicans. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Democrat? According to these morons, you’re, gasp, "a liberal" incarnate. It sounds like something out of The Handmaid's Tale... until you realize this is actually happening.

I see not only do you have difficulty formatting, but you’re not original or creative enough to come up with your own words (or thoughts). No worries! You so beautifully illustrated the liberal mindset: follow like sheep.

But seriously? Nothing of substance to add to my very well-articulated argument? I am absolutely right.

Fear mongering is the right's stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (conservatives) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate lower-middle-class whites into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting people named (or who know someone named) Wayne out to the polls to vote for the Republicans. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Democrat? According to these morons, you’re, gasp, "a liberal" incarnate. It sounds like something out of The Handmaid's Tale... until you realize this is actually happening.

The party of peace and tolerance is above using fear to motivate its base.

Hence the left has never declared that the GOP was waging a war on women, used crises to advocate for gun control, or used fear of racist whites to rile up its base.

Nor have leftists ever marched in the streets to protest against any of these fears, despite my lying eyes.

Never, ever.

Not once.

Ever.

Slow-witted Republican,

used crises to advocate for gun control

Um, yes, we have done that. It hasn't worked, because "gun control" died (with all those little kids) at Sandy Hook. The new term is "massacre reduction" -- laws that reduce open access to semi-automatics/extended magazines/bump stocks/silencers in ways that result in a) fewer massacres and b) when they happen (there's too many guns for them not to) maybe fewer dead people. Seems, y'know, like kind of a nice thing...

or used fear of racist whites to rile up its base.

I think you mean: used the fears of racist whites to rile up its base. That's straight outta the Republican playbook. And it works!

This entire post can be condensed into a single, eternal truism.

Whatever a liberal/progressive says, they mean the opposite. Period.

There are only fifty-eight bazillion examples.

“Trump colluded with Russians”
Translation: “Hilary colluded with Russians”.

“The alt-right are fascists”.
Translation: “We are fascists”.

“Trump isn’t mentally healthy enough to be President”.
Translation: “Hilary’s seizure disorder, Parkinson’s disease, alcoholism, and inability to competently handle classified material makes her unfit for the Presidency”.

“Trump is a vulgar pussy-grabber”.
Translation: ” Al Franken, Harvey Weinstein,and Bill Clinton are vulgar pussy grabbers”.

And….ad infinitum.

We can pity our liberal friends, neighbors, and co-workers. That level of prevarication and cognitive dissonance must take a terrible psychological toll.

But just because we pity them doesn’t mean we can’t crush them, mercilessly, under our boots.

[Anonymous]

Holy crap. If that last post isn't the epitome of anger I don't know what is. "Crush them mercilessly, under our boots" !?!?!?!?

Damn. That some facist anger right there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles manson, nra tea baggers, fox news, hitler, etc... all use fear to fuel anger. They cultivate it and use it to dupe the ignorant into becoming willing pawns n thier desperate game. True evil walks among us.

Yes, and that's why the left keeps making comparisons to Hitler. It's insulting to the memory of the murdered and the nightmares of the survivors. And all it is is a Democratic campaign strategy - to scare the crap out of minorities so they'll go to the polls. Turnout is key to a Democratic win, and fear is a great motivator. And it's basically all they have.

So yes, OP...I agree with fear and anger, but it's the fear being generated from the left. And as far as anger, have you read this forum? The hateful accusations against anyone who dared not vote for Hillary is on a level I've never seen before (and I'm 60).

Your memory must be failing you.

DP, but seriously? Nothing of substance to add to the PP’s very well-articulated argument? S/he is absolutely right. Fear mongering is the left’s stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (liberals) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate minorities into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting poor people out to the polls to vote for the Democrats. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Republican? According to these morons, you’re Hitler incarnate. It sounds like something out of a Mel Brooks satire... until you realize this is actually happening.

DP, but seriously? Nothing of substance to add to the PP’s very well-articulated argument? S/he is absolutely right. Fear mongering is the right's stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (conservatives) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate lower-middle-class whites into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting people named (or who know someone named) Wayne out to the polls to vote for the Republicans. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Democrat? According to these morons, you’re, gasp, "a liberal" incarnate. It sounds like something out of The Handmaid's Tale... until you realize this is actually happening.

I see not only do you have difficulty formatting, but you’re not original or creative enough to come up with your own words (or thoughts). No worries! You so beautifully illustrated the liberal mindset: follow like sheep.

But seriously? Nothing of substance to add to my very well-articulated argument? I am absolutely right.

Fear mongering is the right's stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (conservatives) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate lower-middle-class whites into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting people named (or who know someone named) Wayne out to the polls to vote for the Republicans. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Democrat? According to these morons, you’re, gasp, "a liberal" incarnate. It sounds like something out of The Handmaid's Tale... until you realize this is actually happening.

The party of peace and tolerance is above using fear to motivate its base.

Hence the left has never declared that the GOP was waging a war on women, used crises to advocate for gun control, or used fear of racist whites to rile up its base.

Nor have leftists ever marched in the streets to protest against any of these fears, despite my lying eyes.

Never, ever.

Not once.

Ever.

Slow-witted Republican,

used crises to advocate for gun control

Um, yes, we have done that. It hasn't worked, because "gun control" died (with all those little kids) at Sandy Hook. The new term is "massacre reduction" -- laws that reduce open access to semi-automatics/extended magazines/bump stocks/silencers in ways that result in a) fewer massacres and b) when they happen (there's too many guns for them not to) maybe fewer dead people. Seems, y'know, like kind of a nice thing...

or used fear of racist whites to rile up its base.

I think you mean: used the fears of racist whites to rile up its base. That's straight outta the Republican playbook. And it works!

This entire post can be condensed into a single, eternal truism.

Whatever a liberal/progressive says, they mean the opposite. Period.

There are only fifty-eight bazillion examples.

“Trump colluded with Russians”
Translation: “Hilary colluded with Russians”.

“The alt-right are fascists”.
Translation: “We are fascists”.

“Trump isn’t mentally healthy enough to be President”.
Translation: “Hilary’s seizure disorder, Parkinson’s disease, alcoholism, and inability to competently handle classified material makes her unfit for the Presidency”.

“Trump is a vulgar pussy-grabber”.
Translation: ” Al Franken, Harvey Weinstein,and Bill Clinton are vulgar pussy grabbers”.

And….ad infinitum.

We can pity our liberal friends, neighbors, and co-workers. That level of prevarication and cognitive dissonance must take a terrible psychological toll.

But just because we pity them doesn’t mean we can’t crush them, mercilessly, under our boots.

I agree. Writ-large, liberals are hypocritical in ways and on levels that conservatives aren't. Liberals (as a monolith) pretend to be, and think of themselves as, altruistic, enlightened and high-minded when, in fact, in their heart of hearts, most are just as greedy, small and petty as the Republicans they detest. Moreover, Republicans, in general, don't pretend to be "the good guys." Look at someone like Mick Mulvaney -- he's an evil, mendacious little pig - and he knows it, and knows you know it, and he doesn't care. It's almost sort of admirable.

But here's the funny part (re: your post above) your translation gotcha is undercut by the fact that the things you put in quotes are TRUE.

“Trump colluded with Russians” He did. (Yes, I know, we're still sifting through the evidence. But you watch where this goes.)

“The alt-right are fascists”. They are. Just ask them.

“Trump isn’t mentally healthy enough to be President”. Actually, it's matter of character, not mental health. Trump has terrible character. And (like, say, Mulvaney) he owns it. Character is for suckers.

“Trump is a vulgar pussy-grabber”. He is. He'll tell you so himself.

So don't argue and fret and try to wheedle concessions. Just own your mendacious piggery. Besides, Democrats aren't much better. They just aren't Republicans. It's a game of inches, you know.

[Anonymous]

This is about trumps base not anyone or thing else. When u cant argue the facts attack the other side. How typical. The fact remains that his base is made up of people who watch hannity and believe the crap he spews, they listen to limbaugh levine and savage and revel in the hate these monsters dish out to these fools everyday. Fu

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is about trumps base not anyone or thing else. When u cant argue the facts attack the other side. How typical. The fact remains that his base is made up of people who watch hannity and believe the crap he spews, they listen to limbaugh levine and savage and revel in the hate these monsters dish out to these fools everyday. Fu

Were you the one who told Hillary to call us deplorable?

Sounds like it.

You really don't understand that it was your side that caused us to vote for Trump. There are plenty of people who voted for Trump because of Hillary. You seriously cannot understand that?

It's not because we loved Trump--DH and I were appalled at him when he won the nomination. However, we were more appalled at Hillary. We still are.

As for Trump--I hate his style. However, I like much of what he is accomplishing. Do I like everything he does? NO. But, the choice was clear to me. Hillary made a mess of everything she ever touched.

Voting is about choices. You cannot separate them. And, I do not think you have any idea of what Trump's base is. I'm not sure I do. Is it those who voted for him? Is it those at the rallies? Is it those who held their noses and voted for him? Is it those who support him because of the good things he is accomplishing?
Right now, I would vote for him again. If Mueller comes up with something on collusion, then I won't have to do so. One thing for sure, I like him better than the alternatives that are currently being presented by the Dems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles manson, nra tea baggers, fox news, hitler, etc... all use fear to fuel anger. They cultivate it and use it to dupe the ignorant into becoming willing pawns n thier desperate game. True evil walks among us.

Yes, and that's why the left keeps making comparisons to Hitler. It's insulting to the memory of the murdered and the nightmares of the survivors. And all it is is a Democratic campaign strategy - to scare the crap out of minorities so they'll go to the polls. Turnout is key to a Democratic win, and fear is a great motivator. And it's basically all they have.

So yes, OP...I agree with fear and anger, but it's the fear being generated from the left. And as far as anger, have you read this forum? The hateful accusations against anyone who dared not vote for Hillary is on a level I've never seen before (and I'm 60).

Your memory must be failing you.

DP, but seriously? Nothing of substance to add to the PP’s very well-articulated argument? S/he is absolutely right. Fear mongering is the left’s stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (liberals) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate minorities into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting poor people out to the polls to vote for the Democrats. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Republican? According to these morons, you’re Hitler incarnate. It sounds like something out of a Mel Brooks satire... until you realize this is actually happening.

DP, but seriously? Nothing of substance to add to the PP’s very well-articulated argument? S/he is absolutely right. Fear mongering is the right's stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (conservatives) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate lower-middle-class whites into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting people named (or who know someone named) Wayne out to the polls to vote for the Republicans. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Democrat? According to these morons, you’re, gasp, "a liberal" incarnate. It sounds like something out of The Handmaid's Tale... until you realize this is actually happening.

I see not only do you have difficulty formatting, but you’re not original or creative enough to come up with your own words (or thoughts). No worries! You so beautifully illustrated the liberal mindset: follow like sheep.

But seriously? Nothing of substance to add to my very well-articulated argument? I am absolutely right.

Fear mongering is the right's stock and trade. The constant outrage and hyperbole? It’s all designed to whip the base (conservatives) into a frenzy of fear and manipulate lower-middle-class whites into feeling some unnamed fear - all in the hopes of getting people named (or who know someone named) Wayne out to the polls to vote for the Republicans. And if you dare have a mind of your own and vote for a Democrat? According to these morons, you’re, gasp, "a liberal" incarnate. It sounds like something out of The Handmaid's Tale... until you realize this is actually happening.

The party of peace and tolerance is above using fear to motivate its base.

Hence the left has never declared that the GOP was waging a war on women, used crises to advocate for gun control, or used fear of racist whites to rile up its base.

Nor have leftists ever marched in the streets to protest against any of these fears, despite my lying eyes.

Never, ever.

Not once.

Ever.

Slow-witted Republican,

used crises to advocate for gun control

Um, yes, we have done that. It hasn't worked, because "gun control" died (with all those little kids) at Sandy Hook. The new term is "massacre reduction" -- laws that reduce open access to semi-automatics/extended magazines/bump stocks/silencers in ways that result in a) fewer massacres and b) when they happen (there's too many guns for them not to) maybe fewer dead people. Seems, y'know, like kind of a nice thing...

or used fear of racist whites to rile up its base.

I think you mean: used the fears of racist whites to rile up its base. That's straight outta the Republican playbook. And it works!

This entire post can be condensed into a single, eternal truism.

Whatever a liberal/progressive says, they mean the opposite. Period.

There are only fifty-eight bazillion examples.

“Trump colluded with Russians”
Translation: “Hilary colluded with Russians”.

“The alt-right are fascists”.
Translation: “We are fascists”.

“Trump isn’t mentally healthy enough to be President”.
Translation: “Hilary’s seizure disorder, Parkinson’s disease, alcoholism, and inability to competently handle classified material makes her unfit for the Presidency”.

“Trump is a vulgar pussy-grabber”.
Translation: ” Al Franken, Harvey Weinstein,and Bill Clinton are vulgar pussy grabbers”.

And….ad infinitum.

We can pity our liberal friends, neighbors, and co-workers. That level of prevarication and cognitive dissonance must take a terrible psychological toll.

But just because we pity them doesn’t mean we can’t crush them, mercilessly, under our boots.

I agree. Writ-large, liberals are hypocritical in ways and on levels that conservatives aren't. Liberals (as a monolith) pretend to be, and think of themselves as, altruistic, enlightened and high-minded when, in fact, in their heart of hearts, most are just as greedy, small and petty as the Republicans they detest. Moreover, Republicans, in general, don't pretend to be "the good guys." Look at someone like Mick Mulvaney -- he's an evil, mendacious little pig - and he knows it, and knows you know it, and he doesn't care. It's almost sort of admirable.

But here's the funny part (re: your post above) your translation gotcha is undercut by the fact that the things you put in quotes are TRUE.

“Trump colluded with Russians” He did. (Yes, I know, we're still sifting through the evidence. But you watch where this goes.)

“The alt-right are fascists”. They are. Just ask them.

“Trump isn’t mentally healthy enough to be President”. Actually, it's matter of character, not mental health. Trump has terrible character. And (like, say, Mulvaney) he owns it. Character is for suckers.

“Trump is a vulgar pussy-grabber”. He is. He'll tell you so himself.

So don't argue and fret and try to wheedle concessions. Just own your mendacious piggery. Besides, Democrats aren't much better. They just aren't Republicans. It's a game of inches, you know.

Actually, lets be real about who is hypocritical. Conservatives run on traditional family values, responsible fiscal policy, free markets, and smaller govt. Trump Admin violates all of those "key" values.

Democrats try to practice what they preach. Witness Franken, Weinstein, and even Bill Clinton. No Democrat defended Bill's behavior. The argument was simply that lying to the FBI about what was sex did not rise to an impeachable action. No one defended his behavior. Now, I have heard very few Republicans call out Trump for his behavior, which is far worse and continued to occur decades after Clinton's behavior.

[Anonymous]

the good things he is accomplishing?

What is Trump accomplishing? I'm actually asking, respectfully.

[Anonymous]

Actually, lets be real about who is hypocritical. Conservatives run on traditional family values, responsible fiscal policy, free markets, and smaller govt. Trump Admin violates all of those "key" values.

Democrats try to practice what they preach. Witness Franken, Weinstein, and even Bill Clinton. No Democrat defended Bill's behavior. The argument was simply that lying to the FBI about what was sex did not rise to an impeachable action. No one defended his behavior. Now, I have heard very few Republicans call out Trump for his behavior, which is far worse and continued to occur decades after Clinton's behavior.

Please. While I would like to vote for a person because I like him/her, I make my choice on the policies. I am a Conservative. Trump is not--but, his policies go more toward where I think than Hillary's.

The fact that neither Trump nor Hillary fit the mold of people I like, made it easier to vote for me to vote for Trump. If I had chosen a candidate because I liked him, it would have been Sanders for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about trumps base not anyone or thing else. When u cant argue the facts attack the other side. How typical. The fact remains that his base is made up of people who watch hannity and believe the crap he spews, they listen to limbaugh levine and savage and revel in the hate these monsters dish out to these fools everyday. Fu

Were you the one who told Hillary to call us deplorable?

Sounds like it.

You really don't understand that it was your side that caused us to vote for Trump. There are plenty of people who voted for Trump because of Hillary. You seriously cannot understand that?

It's not because we loved Trump--DH and I were appalled at him when he won the nomination. However, we were more appalled at Hillary. We still are.

As for Trump--I hate his style. However, I like much of what he is accomplishing. Do I like everything he does? NO. But, the choice was clear to me. Hillary made a mess of everything she ever touched.

Voting is about choices. You cannot separate them. And, I do not think you have any idea of what Trump's base is. I'm not sure I do. Is it those who voted for him? Is it those at the rallies? Is it those who held their noses and voted for him? Is it those who support him because of the good things he is accomplishing?
Right now, I would vote for him again. If Mueller comes up with something on collusion, then I won't have to do so. One thing for sure, I like him better than the alternatives that are currently being presented by the Dems.

I highly doubt that a true member of trumpys base would b posting here, let alone b able to write or care enough to write a coherent paragraph. Smehow u r worse than them because u r conscious and aware of the banal evil that is in trumps shadow. Just like the wermacht general staff that appeased adolph and went along for the ride. The difference between us is that i loathe u not out of fear but contempt. U fear the truth so you embrace people that manipulate the deplorables like jones, hannity, savage, etc. u dont even care enough about your own country to b intellectually or morally honest. Fu and have a nice day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Holy crap. If that last post isn't the epitome of anger I don't know what is. "Crush them mercilessly, under our boots" !?!?!?!?

Damn. That some facist anger right there.

He is terribly angry and delusional. Best to ignore him; he thinks he’s intellectual, but he’s a failure, couldn’t hack it at an excellent, most competitive school, and relies on this site to vent his spleen. Pretty pathetic. Let it think it’s winning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy crap. If that last post isn't the epitome of anger I don't know what is. "Crush them mercilessly, under our boots" !?!?!?!?

Damn. That some facist anger right there.

He is terribly angry and delusional. Best to ignore him; he thinks he’s intellectual, but he’s a failure, couldn’t hack it at an excellent, most competitive school, and relies on this site to vent his spleen. Pretty pathetic. Let it think it’s winning.

When u cannot debate u make personal attacks. Typical

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about trumps base not anyone or thing else. When u cant argue the facts attack the other side. How typical. The fact remains that his base is made up of people who watch hannity and believe the crap he spews, they listen to limbaugh levine and savage and revel in the hate these monsters dish out to these fools everyday. Fu

Were you the one who told Hillary to call us deplorable?

Sounds like it.

You really don't understand that it was your side that caused us to vote for Trump. There are plenty of people who voted for Trump because of Hillary. You seriously cannot understand that?

It's not because we loved Trump--DH and I were appalled at him when he won the nomination. However, we were more appalled at Hillary. We still are.

As for Trump--I hate his style. However, I like much of what he is accomplishing. Do I like everything he does? NO. But, the choice was clear to me. Hillary made a mess of everything she ever touched.

Voting is about choices. You cannot separate them. And, I do not think you have any idea of what Trump's base is. I'm not sure I do. Is it those who voted for him? Is it those at the rallies? Is it those who held their noses and voted for him? Is it those who support him because of the good things he is accomplishing?
Right now, I would vote for him again. If Mueller comes up with something on collusion, then I won't have to do so. One thing for sure, I like him better than the alternatives that are currently being presented by the Dems.

I highly doubt that a true member of trumpys base would b posting here, let alone b able to write or care enough to write a coherent paragraph. Smehow u r worse than them because u r conscious and aware of the banal evil that is in trumps shadow. Just like the wermacht general staff that appeased adolph and went along for the ride. The difference between us is that i loathe u not out of fear but contempt. U fear the truth so you embrace people that manipulate the deplorables like jones, hannity, savage, etc. u dont even care enough about your own country to b intellectually or morally honest. Fu and have a nice day.

I was an early poster, who pointed out that it is the LIBERALS who are fear-mongering in order to scare minorities - traditionally, their base - to the polls, since turn-out is key to a Democrat win. I specifically called out the false and horrible comparisons to Hitler......essentially saying, "vote Democrat or the racists will get you!"

And, right on cue, we have the liberal above demonstrating my point, comparing Trump to Hitler, with the expected FU thrown in for good measure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about trumps base not anyone or thing else. When u cant argue the facts attack the other side. How typical. The fact remains that his base is made up of people who watch hannity and believe the crap he spews, they listen to limbaugh levine and savage and revel in the hate these monsters dish out to these fools everyday. Fu

Were you the one who told Hillary to call us deplorable?

Sounds like it.

You really don't understand that it was your side that caused us to vote for Trump. There are plenty of people who voted for Trump because of Hillary. You seriously cannot understand that?

It's not because we loved Trump--DH and I were appalled at him when he won the nomination. However, we were more appalled at Hillary. We still are.

As for Trump--I hate his style. However, I like much of what he is accomplishing. Do I like everything he does? NO. But, the choice was clear to me. Hillary made a mess of everything she ever touched.

Voting is about choices. You cannot separate them. And, I do not think you have any idea of what Trump's base is. I'm not sure I do. Is it those who voted for him? Is it those at the rallies? Is it those who held their noses and voted for him? Is it those who support him because of the good things he is accomplishing?
Right now, I would vote for him again. If Mueller comes up with something on collusion, then I won't have to do so. One thing for sure, I like him better than the alternatives that are currently being presented by the Dems.

I highly doubt that a true member of trumpys base would b posting here, let alone b able to write or care enough to write a coherent paragraph. Smehow u r worse than them because u r conscious and aware of the banal evil that is in trumps shadow. Just like the wermacht general staff that appeased adolph and went along for the ride. The difference between us is that i loathe u not out of fear but contempt. U fear the truth so you embrace people that manipulate the deplorables like jones, hannity, savage, etc. u dont even care enough about your own country to b intellectually or morally honest. Fu and have a nice day.

I was an early poster, who pointed out that it is the LIBERALS who are fear-mongering in order to scare minorities - traditionally, their base - to the polls, since turn-out is key to a Democrat win. I specifically called out the false and horrible comparisons to Hitler......essentially saying, "vote Democrat or the racists will get you!"

And, right on cue, we have the liberal above demonstrating my point, comparing Trump to Hitler, with the expected FU thrown in for good measure.


You are aware that this thread is about trumps base, riight? Is there any liberal equivalent to alex jones, limbaugh, savage, levine, hannity, etc. if so, please name them because i am honestly unaware of any.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is about trumps base not anyone or thing else. When u cant argue the facts attack the other side. How typical. The fact remains that his base is made up of people who watch hannity and believe the crap he spews, they listen to limbaugh levine and savage and revel in the hate these monsters dish out to these fools everyday. Fu

Were you the one who told Hillary to call us deplorable?

Sounds like it.

You really don't understand that it was your side that caused us to vote for Trump. There are plenty of people who voted for Trump because of Hillary. You seriously cannot understand that?

It's not because we loved Trump--DH and I were appalled at him when he won the nomination. However, we were more appalled at Hillary. We still are.

As for Trump--I hate his style. However, I like much of what he is accomplishing. Do I like everything he does? NO. But, the choice was clear to me. Hillary made a mess of everything she ever touched.

Voting is about choices. You cannot separate them. And, I do not think you have any idea of what Trump's base is. I'm not sure I do. Is it those who voted for him? Is it those at the rallies? Is it those who held their noses and voted for him? Is it those who support him because of the good things he is accomplishing?
Right now, I would vote for him again. If Mueller comes up with something on collusion, then I won't have to do so. One thing for sure, I like him better than the alternatives that are currently being presented by the Dems.

I highly doubt that a true member of trumpys base would b posting here, let alone b able to write or care enough to write a coherent paragraph. Smehow u r worse than them because u r conscious and aware of the banal evil that is in trumps shadow. Just like the wermacht general staff that appeased adolph and went along for the ride. The difference between us is that i loathe u not out of fear but contempt. U fear the truth so you embrace people that manipulate the deplorables like jones, hannity, savage, etc. u dont even care enough about your own country to b intellectually or morally honest. Fu and have a nice day.

I was an early poster, who pointed out that it is the LIBERALS who are fear-mongering in order to scare minorities - traditionally, their base - to the polls, since turn-out is key to a Democrat win. I specifically called out the false and horrible comparisons to Hitler......essentially saying, "vote Democrat or the racists will get you!"

And, right on cue, we have the liberal above demonstrating my point, comparing Trump to Hitler, with the expected FU thrown in for good measure.

So, what are the liberal equivalents to alex jones, hannity, limbaugh, savage, etc. ? These rightwing media whores that are the conduit that stokes the fears of the ignorant. When i say fu i mean it woth the utmost affection btw.