"Every vote for Hillary is a vote for elitist corruption." -Dr. Jill Stein

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jill Stein has made some sharp observations. Sounds like she should have been Trump's running mate.

She is basically a progressive, non-insane version of Donald Trump - just a politician full of promises she cannot keep.

[Anonymous]

Why isn't trump using this against Clinton? Also why isn't he using more ads?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jill Stein has made some sharp observations. Sounds like she should have been Trump's running mate.

She's an anti-vax moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary isn't great or perfect. BUT SHE IS LITERALLY THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

+1000

Sadly, this. I have found that once you accept all politicians are corrupt, it bothers you less.

You know, I like to think that it is not the politicians who are corrupt, but the system that is broken.

The outrage is not that Trump took a $900 million loss, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that Hillary's associates made money off their connections to her, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that there is a revolving door between lobbyists and Congress, but that it is legal.

We know what needs to happen to fix this.

Public financing of campaigns
Laws prohibiting solicitation of contributions while in office
Laws prohibiting the revolving door between lobbyists and congress
reversal of Citizens United

Why can't we all get behind what needs to be done?

Agreed. How do we make this happen? After Trump is out of the picture, of course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
As a senator she only has one of fifty votes. I'm sure you knew that, but chose to have a mental fart when you wrote your snippet.

We don't expect overseas CTR contractors to know everything about HRC, but at least get the number of Senators correct.

Hon, if you're going to insult someone, the insult sticks a lot better when you base it in fact. Donald has the "international," shall we say, commenter all locked down.

Not PP, but I haven't seen anything regarding Trump and paying people to post on forums like this one. Care to elaborate? And are you denying CTR exists, especially here, Hon?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary isn't great or perfect. BUT SHE IS LITERALLY THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

+1000

Sadly, this. I have found that once you accept all politicians are corrupt, it bothers you less.

You know, I like to think that it is not the politicians who are corrupt, but the system that is broken.

The outrage is not that Trump took a $900 million loss, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that Hillary's associates made money off their connections to her, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that there is a revolving door between lobbyists and Congress, but that it is legal.

We know what needs to happen to fix this.

Public financing of campaigns
Laws prohibiting solicitation of contributions while in office
Laws prohibiting the revolving door between lobbyists and congress
reversal of Citizens United

Why can't we all get behind what needs to be done?

Agreed. How do we make this happen? After Trump is out of the picture, of course.

Um, these are exactly what Trump is talking about implementing, along with term limits. So why would you want him out of the picture?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jill Stein has made some sharp observations. Sounds like she should have been Trump's running mate.

You didn't watch John Oliver's piece on Stein and Johnson last night.

Oliver is an entertainer. Sadly, many people confuse Hollywood with politics.

Thanks, Hillary & Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary isn't great or perfect. BUT SHE IS LITERALLY THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

Not LITERALLY. The ballots will include other option(s) for president. I thought liberals were smart.

thankfully there are no longer intelligence tests for voting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jill Stein has made some sharp observations. Sounds like she should have been Trump's running mate.

You didn't watch John Oliver's piece on Stein and Johnson last night.

Oliver is an entertainer. Sadly, many people confuse Hollywood with politics.

Thanks, Hillary & Trump

Oliver will soon be harkening back to his homeland's vote on Brexit for context on the Trump election victory

[Anonymous]

I am a doctor, and she lost me with her anti-vax position.

[Anonymous]

at least she isn't bought and paid for by Goldman Sachs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:at least she isn't bought and paid for by Goldman Sachs.

Or by Big Pharma. It takes guts to speak the truth.

[Anonymous]

She's a nut.. A total embarrassment for the Green party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many black Americans are beginning to see the light about Hillary's corruption. But just like many women, why would they tell you? We don't want to get torched by the violent Hillary supporters.

This is what gets me, and what I've been trying to share with my AA pals who seem to like her. I can't get it through their heads. The super predator comment is bothersome to this day. She was racist when she said it, and to think she's suddenly "evolved" is pure bullshit.

As a white woman myself, I know she's only saying what the public wants to hear. (same for Trump) But If people think she's FOR the average Joe, they're fooling themselves. She'll say enough to get elected. So until I see her making huge changes to address poverty and to improves schools in both rural and urban places, I'll continue to view her as yet another dirty politician who blows hot air.

Let's see her meet with gangs the way Farrakhan has. Now THAT I'd pay to see!

Or perhaps it's not for you, white person, to say what AAs should be bother by

[Anonymous]

Jill Stein is just like other women hating on women. She's jealous. And, for a "DR" to call someone elitist is laughable.