"Every vote for Hillary is a vote for elitist corruption." -Dr. Jill Stein

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary isn't great or perfect. BUT SHE IS LITERALLY THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

+1000

Sadly, this. I have found that once you accept all politicians are corrupt, it bothers you less.

And that's how dictators happen.

The candidates who vow to lock up their political opponents and shut down media that disagrees with them are the future dictators. That is what dictators do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary isn't great or perfect. BUT SHE IS LITERALLY THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

+1000

Sadly, this. I have found that once you accept all politicians are corrupt, it bothers you less.

And that's how dictators happen.

The candidates who vow to lock up their political opponents and shut down media that disagrees with them are the future dictators. That is what dictators do.

Let’s be clear.
The concept of “locking her up” is NOT because she is political opponent. He had 16 other opponents in the primaries and there was never talk about locking any of them up.
The idea of locking her up has everything to do with her actions as SoS. The fact that others, who have done much less, were actually locked up, or at least given serious fines and held to account for their actions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary isn't great or perfect. BUT SHE IS LITERALLY THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

Not LITERALLY. The ballots will include other option(s) for president. I thought liberals were smart.

Words literally change meaning. Literally means literally and not literally based on how it's used. Sick means badass as in "that's one sick ride". Words change. Step out of your ivory tower and learn about the real world. It's been happening since words started.



http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/living/literally-definition/

Nice try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And a vote for Trump is a vote for...?

Ignorance?

Racism?

Bullying?

American Borders. Why not?

[Anonymous]

Voting for Hillary is like putting a fully loaded gun to your head, pulling the trigger and knowing you will certainly blow your brains out on the first try. Voting for Trump is like doing the same thing but some of the chambers are empty, playing Russian Roulette is more appealing isn't it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And a vote for Trump is a vote for...?

At least he's an outsider. People are sick. sick. sick of the Washington Corruption Machine.

DT is not an outsider. That's like saying the Koch brothers or Soros are outsiders. DT has always been thick into politics. He just never won and served anybody but himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Voting for Hillary is like putting a fully loaded gun to your head, pulling the trigger and knowing you will certainly blow your brains out on the first try. Voting for Trump is like doing the same thing but some of the chambers are empty, playing Russian Roulette is more appealing isn't it?

List of things Trump supporters are not good at:

...

253. Making analogies

...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary isn't great or perfect. BUT SHE IS LITERALLY THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

+1000

Sadly, this. I have found that once you accept all politicians are corrupt, it bothers you less.

You know, I like to think that it is not the politicians who are corrupt, but the system that is broken.

The outrage is not that Trump took a $900 million loss, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that Hillary's associates made money off their connections to her, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that there is a revolving door between lobbyists and Congress, but that it is legal.

We know what needs to happen to fix this.

Public financing of campaigns
Laws prohibiting solicitation of contributions while in office
Laws prohibiting the revolving door between lobbyists and congress
reversal of Citizens United

Why can't we all get behind what needs to be done?

Trump is our best bet for that, 'cause we all know, it sure ain't Hillary.

She's *had* her opportunity to fix things. And she's only made everything so much worse. Why?

As a senator she only has one of fifty votes. I'm sure you knew that, but chose to have a mental fart when you wrote your snippet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary isn't great or perfect. BUT SHE IS LITERALLY THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

+1000

Sadly, this. I have found that once you accept all politicians are corrupt, it bothers you less.

You know, I like to think that it is not the politicians who are corrupt, but the system that is broken.

The outrage is not that Trump took a $900 million loss, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that Hillary's associates made money off their connections to her, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that there is a revolving door between lobbyists and Congress, but that it is legal.

We know what needs to happen to fix this.

Public financing of campaigns
Laws prohibiting solicitation of contributions while in office
Laws prohibiting the revolving door between lobbyists and congress
reversal of Citizens United

Why can't we all get behind what needs to be done?

Trump is our best bet for that, 'cause we all know, it sure ain't Hillary.

She's *had* her opportunity to fix things. And she's only made everything so much worse. Why?

Right, because for years she's been the only person in the USA to wield all three powers: the legislative, the executive and the judiciary. It's ALL been on her. Absolutely no one has stood in her way.

She's already been an utter failure... after all these years.

Well she didn't lose a billion plus dollars, steal from the stock holders, cheat Her suppliers and vendors, or lose Taj Mahal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary isn't great or perfect. BUT SHE IS LITERALLY THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE.

+1000

Sadly, this. I have found that once you accept all politicians are corrupt, it bothers you less.

You know, I like to think that it is not the politicians who are corrupt, but the system that is broken.

The outrage is not that Trump took a $900 million loss, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that Hillary's associates made money off their connections to her, but that it was legal.

The outrage is not that there is a revolving door between lobbyists and Congress, but that it is legal.

We know what needs to happen to fix this.

Public financing of campaigns
Laws prohibiting solicitation of contributions while in office
Laws prohibiting the revolving door between lobbyists and congress
reversal of Citizens United

Why can't we all get behind what needs to be done?

The reason the business loss is legal is for economic reasons - you want to promote entrepreneurship and encourage job creation. There is no comparison between that and pay for play or any activity in which a politician is in bed with private industry.

Except he used the business loss not to pay personal taxes, not business taxes. And DT payed a lot to play, just ask Pam Bondi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
As a senator she only has one of fifty votes. I'm sure you knew that, but chose to have a mental fart when you wrote your snippet.

We don't expect overseas CTR contractors to know everything about HRC, but at least get the number of Senators correct.

[Anonymous]

Stein is a tremendous idiot and liar on par with Trump:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
As a senator she only has one of fifty votes. I'm sure you knew that, but chose to have a mental fart when you wrote your snippet.

We don't expect overseas CTR contractors to know everything about HRC, but at least get the number of Senators correct.

Hon, if you're going to insult someone, the insult sticks a lot better when you base it in fact. Donald has the "international," shall we say, commenter all locked down.

[Anonymous]

Jill Stein has made some sharp observations. Sounds like she should have been Trump's running mate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jill Stein has made some sharp observations. Sounds like she should have been Trump's running mate.

You didn't watch John Oliver's piece on Stein and Johnson last night.